Cargando…
Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument
OBJECTIVE: To validate a screening instrument using self-reported assessment of frailty syndrome in older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento study conducted in Sao Paulo, SP, Southeastern Brazil. The sample consisted of 433 older adult in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4386551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005516 |
_version_ | 1782365184790102016 |
---|---|
author | Nunes, Daniella Pires Duarte, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira Santos, Jair Lício Ferreira Lebrão, Maria Lúcia |
author_facet | Nunes, Daniella Pires Duarte, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira Santos, Jair Lício Ferreira Lebrão, Maria Lúcia |
author_sort | Nunes, Daniella Pires |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To validate a screening instrument using self-reported assessment of frailty syndrome in older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento study conducted in Sao Paulo, SP, Southeastern Brazil. The sample consisted of 433 older adult individuals (≥ 75 years) assessed in 2009. The self-reported instrument can be applied to older adults or their proxy respondents and consists of dichotomous questions directly related to each component of the frailty phenotype, which is considered the gold standard model: unintentional weight loss, fatigue, low physical activity, decreased physical strength, and decreased walking speed. The same classification proposed in the phenotype was utilized: not frail (no component identified); pre-frail (presence of one or two components), and frail (presence of three or more components). Because this is a screening instrument, “process of frailty” was included as a category (pre-frail and frail). Cronbach’s α was used in psychometric analysis to evaluate the reliability and validity of the criterion, the sensitivity, the specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values. Factor analysis was used to assess the suitability of the proposed number of components. RESULTS: Decreased walking speed and decreased physical strength showed good internal consistency (α = 0.77 and 0.72, respectively); however, low physical activity was less satisfactory (α = 0.63). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying pre-frail individuals were 89.7% and 24.3%, respectively, while those for identifying frail individuals were 63.2% and 71.6%, respectively. In addition, 89.7% of the individuals from both the evaluations were identified in the “process of frailty” category. CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported assessment of frailty can identify the syndrome among older adults and can be used as a screening tool. Its advantages include simplicity, rapidity, low cost, and ability to be used by different professionals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4386551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43865512015-04-08 Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument Nunes, Daniella Pires Duarte, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira Santos, Jair Lício Ferreira Lebrão, Maria Lúcia Rev Saude Publica Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To validate a screening instrument using self-reported assessment of frailty syndrome in older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento study conducted in Sao Paulo, SP, Southeastern Brazil. The sample consisted of 433 older adult individuals (≥ 75 years) assessed in 2009. The self-reported instrument can be applied to older adults or their proxy respondents and consists of dichotomous questions directly related to each component of the frailty phenotype, which is considered the gold standard model: unintentional weight loss, fatigue, low physical activity, decreased physical strength, and decreased walking speed. The same classification proposed in the phenotype was utilized: not frail (no component identified); pre-frail (presence of one or two components), and frail (presence of three or more components). Because this is a screening instrument, “process of frailty” was included as a category (pre-frail and frail). Cronbach’s α was used in psychometric analysis to evaluate the reliability and validity of the criterion, the sensitivity, the specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values. Factor analysis was used to assess the suitability of the proposed number of components. RESULTS: Decreased walking speed and decreased physical strength showed good internal consistency (α = 0.77 and 0.72, respectively); however, low physical activity was less satisfactory (α = 0.63). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying pre-frail individuals were 89.7% and 24.3%, respectively, while those for identifying frail individuals were 63.2% and 71.6%, respectively. In addition, 89.7% of the individuals from both the evaluations were identified in the “process of frailty” category. CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported assessment of frailty can identify the syndrome among older adults and can be used as a screening tool. Its advantages include simplicity, rapidity, low cost, and ability to be used by different professionals. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2015-02-19 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4386551/ /pubmed/25741658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005516 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Nunes, Daniella Pires Duarte, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira Santos, Jair Lício Ferreira Lebrão, Maria Lúcia Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument |
title | Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument |
title_full | Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument |
title_fullStr | Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument |
title_short | Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument |
title_sort | screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4386551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nunesdaniellapires screeningforfrailtyinolderadultsusingaselfreportedinstrument AT duarteyedaaparecidadeoliveira screeningforfrailtyinolderadultsusingaselfreportedinstrument AT santosjairlicioferreira screeningforfrailtyinolderadultsusingaselfreportedinstrument AT lebraomarialucia screeningforfrailtyinolderadultsusingaselfreportedinstrument |