Cargando…

Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument

OBJECTIVE: To validate a screening instrument using self-reported assessment of frailty syndrome in older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento study conducted in Sao Paulo, SP, Southeastern Brazil. The sample consisted of 433 older adult in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunes, Daniella Pires, Duarte, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira, Santos, Jair Lício Ferreira, Lebrão, Maria Lúcia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4386551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005516
_version_ 1782365184790102016
author Nunes, Daniella Pires
Duarte, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira
Santos, Jair Lício Ferreira
Lebrão, Maria Lúcia
author_facet Nunes, Daniella Pires
Duarte, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira
Santos, Jair Lício Ferreira
Lebrão, Maria Lúcia
author_sort Nunes, Daniella Pires
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To validate a screening instrument using self-reported assessment of frailty syndrome in older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento study conducted in Sao Paulo, SP, Southeastern Brazil. The sample consisted of 433 older adult individuals (≥ 75 years) assessed in 2009. The self-reported instrument can be applied to older adults or their proxy respondents and consists of dichotomous questions directly related to each component of the frailty phenotype, which is considered the gold standard model: unintentional weight loss, fatigue, low physical activity, decreased physical strength, and decreased walking speed. The same classification proposed in the phenotype was utilized: not frail (no component identified); pre-frail (presence of one or two components), and frail (presence of three or more components). Because this is a screening instrument, “process of frailty” was included as a category (pre-frail and frail). Cronbach’s α was used in psychometric analysis to evaluate the reliability and validity of the criterion, the sensitivity, the specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values. Factor analysis was used to assess the suitability of the proposed number of components. RESULTS: Decreased walking speed and decreased physical strength showed good internal consistency (α = 0.77 and 0.72, respectively); however, low physical activity was less satisfactory (α = 0.63). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying pre-frail individuals were 89.7% and 24.3%, respectively, while those for identifying frail individuals were 63.2% and 71.6%, respectively. In addition, 89.7% of the individuals from both the evaluations were identified in the “process of frailty” category. CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported assessment of frailty can identify the syndrome among older adults and can be used as a screening tool. Its advantages include simplicity, rapidity, low cost, and ability to be used by different professionals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4386551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43865512015-04-08 Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument Nunes, Daniella Pires Duarte, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira Santos, Jair Lício Ferreira Lebrão, Maria Lúcia Rev Saude Publica Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To validate a screening instrument using self-reported assessment of frailty syndrome in older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento study conducted in Sao Paulo, SP, Southeastern Brazil. The sample consisted of 433 older adult individuals (≥ 75 years) assessed in 2009. The self-reported instrument can be applied to older adults or their proxy respondents and consists of dichotomous questions directly related to each component of the frailty phenotype, which is considered the gold standard model: unintentional weight loss, fatigue, low physical activity, decreased physical strength, and decreased walking speed. The same classification proposed in the phenotype was utilized: not frail (no component identified); pre-frail (presence of one or two components), and frail (presence of three or more components). Because this is a screening instrument, “process of frailty” was included as a category (pre-frail and frail). Cronbach’s α was used in psychometric analysis to evaluate the reliability and validity of the criterion, the sensitivity, the specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values. Factor analysis was used to assess the suitability of the proposed number of components. RESULTS: Decreased walking speed and decreased physical strength showed good internal consistency (α = 0.77 and 0.72, respectively); however, low physical activity was less satisfactory (α = 0.63). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying pre-frail individuals were 89.7% and 24.3%, respectively, while those for identifying frail individuals were 63.2% and 71.6%, respectively. In addition, 89.7% of the individuals from both the evaluations were identified in the “process of frailty” category. CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported assessment of frailty can identify the syndrome among older adults and can be used as a screening tool. Its advantages include simplicity, rapidity, low cost, and ability to be used by different professionals. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2015-02-19 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4386551/ /pubmed/25741658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005516 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nunes, Daniella Pires
Duarte, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira
Santos, Jair Lício Ferreira
Lebrão, Maria Lúcia
Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument
title Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument
title_full Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument
title_fullStr Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument
title_full_unstemmed Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument
title_short Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument
title_sort screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4386551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005516
work_keys_str_mv AT nunesdaniellapires screeningforfrailtyinolderadultsusingaselfreportedinstrument
AT duarteyedaaparecidadeoliveira screeningforfrailtyinolderadultsusingaselfreportedinstrument
AT santosjairlicioferreira screeningforfrailtyinolderadultsusingaselfreportedinstrument
AT lebraomarialucia screeningforfrailtyinolderadultsusingaselfreportedinstrument