Cargando…
Systematic reviews with language restrictions and no author contact have lower overall credibility: a methodology study
BACKGROUND: High-quality systematic reviews (SRs) require rigorous approaches to identify, appraise, select, and synthesize research evidence relevant to a specific question. In this study, we evaluated the association between two steps in the conduct of an SR – restricting the search to English, an...
Autores principales: | Wang, Zhen, Brito, Juan P, Tsapas, Apostolos, Griebeler, Marcio L, Alahdab, Fares, Murad, Mohammad Hassan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4386783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25878512 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S78879 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Pharmacologic interventions for painful diabetic neuropathy: an umbrella systematic review and comparative effectiveness network meta-analysis (Protocol)
por: Griebeler, Marcio L, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Impact of contacting study authors to obtain additional data for systematic reviews: diagnostic accuracy studies for hepatic fibrosis
por: Selph, Shelley S, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Keeping it credible in cohort multiple Randomised Controlled Trials: the Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE 75+) study model of patient and public involvement and engagement
por: Heaven, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
On credit and credibility: Guest authors, ghostwriters, and everyone else in between
por: Gupta, Amod
Publicado: (2021) -
The importance of credible information about contact lens wear during pandemic
por: Orsborn, Gary
Publicado: (2020)