Cargando…

Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine safe ranges of oblique angle, skin entry point and needle length by reviewing computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the usefulness of a bent tip needle during celiac plexus block (CPB). METHODS: CT scans of 60 CPB patients were reviewed. Image of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Ji Won, Choi, Eun Kyeong, Park, Chol Hee, Choi, Jong Bum, Ko, Dong-Kyun, Lee, Youn-Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.109
_version_ 1782365271991779328
author An, Ji Won
Choi, Eun Kyeong
Park, Chol Hee
Choi, Jong Bum
Ko, Dong-Kyun
Lee, Youn-Woo
author_facet An, Ji Won
Choi, Eun Kyeong
Park, Chol Hee
Choi, Jong Bum
Ko, Dong-Kyun
Lee, Youn-Woo
author_sort An, Ji Won
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine safe ranges of oblique angle, skin entry point and needle length by reviewing computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the usefulness of a bent tip needle during celiac plexus block (CPB). METHODS: CT scans of 60 CPB patients were reviewed. Image of the uppermost margin of L2 vertebral body was used to measure the minimal and maximal oblique angles and the distances from the midline to skin puncture point. The imaginary needle trajectory distance was calculated by three-dimensional measurement. When the procedure was performed by using a 10° bent tip needle under a 20° oblique X-ray fluoroscopic view, the distance (GF/G'F) from the midline to the actual puncture site was measured. RESULTS: The imaginary safe oblique angle range was 26.4-34.2° and 27.7-36.0° on the right and left, respectively. The distance from the midline to skin puncture point was 6.1-7.6 cm on the right and 6.3-7.6 cm on the left. The needle trajectory distance at minimal angle was 9.6-11.6 cm on the right and 9.5-11.5 cm on the left. The distance of GF/G'F was 5.1-6.5 cm and 5.0-6.4 cm on the right and left, respectively. All imaginary parameters were correlated with BMI except for GF/G'F. All complications were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: We identified safe values of angles and distances using a straight needle. Furthermore, using a bent tip needle under a 20° oblique fluoroscopic view, we could safely perform CPB with smaller parameter values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4387455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Pain Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43874552015-04-07 Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle An, Ji Won Choi, Eun Kyeong Park, Chol Hee Choi, Jong Bum Ko, Dong-Kyun Lee, Youn-Woo Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine safe ranges of oblique angle, skin entry point and needle length by reviewing computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the usefulness of a bent tip needle during celiac plexus block (CPB). METHODS: CT scans of 60 CPB patients were reviewed. Image of the uppermost margin of L2 vertebral body was used to measure the minimal and maximal oblique angles and the distances from the midline to skin puncture point. The imaginary needle trajectory distance was calculated by three-dimensional measurement. When the procedure was performed by using a 10° bent tip needle under a 20° oblique X-ray fluoroscopic view, the distance (GF/G'F) from the midline to the actual puncture site was measured. RESULTS: The imaginary safe oblique angle range was 26.4-34.2° and 27.7-36.0° on the right and left, respectively. The distance from the midline to skin puncture point was 6.1-7.6 cm on the right and 6.3-7.6 cm on the left. The needle trajectory distance at minimal angle was 9.6-11.6 cm on the right and 9.5-11.5 cm on the left. The distance of GF/G'F was 5.1-6.5 cm and 5.0-6.4 cm on the right and left, respectively. All imaginary parameters were correlated with BMI except for GF/G'F. All complications were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: We identified safe values of angles and distances using a straight needle. Furthermore, using a bent tip needle under a 20° oblique fluoroscopic view, we could safely perform CPB with smaller parameter values. The Korean Pain Society 2015-04 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4387455/ /pubmed/25852832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.109 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
An, Ji Won
Choi, Eun Kyeong
Park, Chol Hee
Choi, Jong Bum
Ko, Dong-Kyun
Lee, Youn-Woo
Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle
title Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle
title_full Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle
title_fullStr Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle
title_full_unstemmed Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle
title_short Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle
title_sort alternative method of retrocrural approach during celiac plexus block using a bent tip needle
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.109
work_keys_str_mv AT anjiwon alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle
AT choieunkyeong alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle
AT parkcholhee alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle
AT choijongbum alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle
AT kodongkyun alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle
AT leeyounwoo alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle