Cargando…
Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle
BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine safe ranges of oblique angle, skin entry point and needle length by reviewing computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the usefulness of a bent tip needle during celiac plexus block (CPB). METHODS: CT scans of 60 CPB patients were reviewed. Image of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Pain Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.109 |
_version_ | 1782365271991779328 |
---|---|
author | An, Ji Won Choi, Eun Kyeong Park, Chol Hee Choi, Jong Bum Ko, Dong-Kyun Lee, Youn-Woo |
author_facet | An, Ji Won Choi, Eun Kyeong Park, Chol Hee Choi, Jong Bum Ko, Dong-Kyun Lee, Youn-Woo |
author_sort | An, Ji Won |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine safe ranges of oblique angle, skin entry point and needle length by reviewing computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the usefulness of a bent tip needle during celiac plexus block (CPB). METHODS: CT scans of 60 CPB patients were reviewed. Image of the uppermost margin of L2 vertebral body was used to measure the minimal and maximal oblique angles and the distances from the midline to skin puncture point. The imaginary needle trajectory distance was calculated by three-dimensional measurement. When the procedure was performed by using a 10° bent tip needle under a 20° oblique X-ray fluoroscopic view, the distance (GF/G'F) from the midline to the actual puncture site was measured. RESULTS: The imaginary safe oblique angle range was 26.4-34.2° and 27.7-36.0° on the right and left, respectively. The distance from the midline to skin puncture point was 6.1-7.6 cm on the right and 6.3-7.6 cm on the left. The needle trajectory distance at minimal angle was 9.6-11.6 cm on the right and 9.5-11.5 cm on the left. The distance of GF/G'F was 5.1-6.5 cm and 5.0-6.4 cm on the right and left, respectively. All imaginary parameters were correlated with BMI except for GF/G'F. All complications were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: We identified safe values of angles and distances using a straight needle. Furthermore, using a bent tip needle under a 20° oblique fluoroscopic view, we could safely perform CPB with smaller parameter values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4387455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Pain Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43874552015-04-07 Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle An, Ji Won Choi, Eun Kyeong Park, Chol Hee Choi, Jong Bum Ko, Dong-Kyun Lee, Youn-Woo Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine safe ranges of oblique angle, skin entry point and needle length by reviewing computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the usefulness of a bent tip needle during celiac plexus block (CPB). METHODS: CT scans of 60 CPB patients were reviewed. Image of the uppermost margin of L2 vertebral body was used to measure the minimal and maximal oblique angles and the distances from the midline to skin puncture point. The imaginary needle trajectory distance was calculated by three-dimensional measurement. When the procedure was performed by using a 10° bent tip needle under a 20° oblique X-ray fluoroscopic view, the distance (GF/G'F) from the midline to the actual puncture site was measured. RESULTS: The imaginary safe oblique angle range was 26.4-34.2° and 27.7-36.0° on the right and left, respectively. The distance from the midline to skin puncture point was 6.1-7.6 cm on the right and 6.3-7.6 cm on the left. The needle trajectory distance at minimal angle was 9.6-11.6 cm on the right and 9.5-11.5 cm on the left. The distance of GF/G'F was 5.1-6.5 cm and 5.0-6.4 cm on the right and left, respectively. All imaginary parameters were correlated with BMI except for GF/G'F. All complications were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: We identified safe values of angles and distances using a straight needle. Furthermore, using a bent tip needle under a 20° oblique fluoroscopic view, we could safely perform CPB with smaller parameter values. The Korean Pain Society 2015-04 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4387455/ /pubmed/25852832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.109 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article An, Ji Won Choi, Eun Kyeong Park, Chol Hee Choi, Jong Bum Ko, Dong-Kyun Lee, Youn-Woo Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle |
title | Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle |
title_full | Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle |
title_fullStr | Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle |
title_short | Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle |
title_sort | alternative method of retrocrural approach during celiac plexus block using a bent tip needle |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anjiwon alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle AT choieunkyeong alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle AT parkcholhee alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle AT choijongbum alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle AT kodongkyun alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle AT leeyounwoo alternativemethodofretrocruralapproachduringceliacplexusblockusingabenttipneedle |