Cargando…

The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements

The use of radiofrequency (98–2450 MHz range) personal exposimeters to measure the electric field (E-field) in far-field exposure conditions was modelled numerically using human body model Gustav and finite integration technique software. Calculations with 256 models of exposure scenarios show that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gryz, Krzysztof, Zradziński, Patryk, Karpowicz, Jolanta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/272460
_version_ 1782365342575624192
author Gryz, Krzysztof
Zradziński, Patryk
Karpowicz, Jolanta
author_facet Gryz, Krzysztof
Zradziński, Patryk
Karpowicz, Jolanta
author_sort Gryz, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description The use of radiofrequency (98–2450 MHz range) personal exposimeters to measure the electric field (E-field) in far-field exposure conditions was modelled numerically using human body model Gustav and finite integration technique software. Calculations with 256 models of exposure scenarios show that the human body has a significant influence on the results of measurements using a single body-worn exposimeter in various locations near the body ((from −96 to +133)%, measurement errors with respect to the unperturbed E-field value). When an exposure assessment involves the exposure limitations provided for the strength of an unperturbed E-field. To improve the application of exposimeters in compliance tests, such discrepancies in the results of measurements by a body-worn exposimeter may be compensated by using of a correction factor applied to the measurement results or alternatively to the exposure limit values. The location of a single exposimeter on the waist to the back side of the human body or on the front of the chest reduces the range of exposure assessments uncertainty (covering various exposure conditions). However, still the uncertainty of exposure assessments using a single exposimeter remains significantly higher than the assessment of the unperturbed E-field using spot measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4387911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43879112015-04-15 The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements Gryz, Krzysztof Zradziński, Patryk Karpowicz, Jolanta Biomed Res Int Research Article The use of radiofrequency (98–2450 MHz range) personal exposimeters to measure the electric field (E-field) in far-field exposure conditions was modelled numerically using human body model Gustav and finite integration technique software. Calculations with 256 models of exposure scenarios show that the human body has a significant influence on the results of measurements using a single body-worn exposimeter in various locations near the body ((from −96 to +133)%, measurement errors with respect to the unperturbed E-field value). When an exposure assessment involves the exposure limitations provided for the strength of an unperturbed E-field. To improve the application of exposimeters in compliance tests, such discrepancies in the results of measurements by a body-worn exposimeter may be compensated by using of a correction factor applied to the measurement results or alternatively to the exposure limit values. The location of a single exposimeter on the waist to the back side of the human body or on the front of the chest reduces the range of exposure assessments uncertainty (covering various exposure conditions). However, still the uncertainty of exposure assessments using a single exposimeter remains significantly higher than the assessment of the unperturbed E-field using spot measurements. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4387911/ /pubmed/25879021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/272460 Text en Copyright © 2015 Krzysztof Gryz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gryz, Krzysztof
Zradziński, Patryk
Karpowicz, Jolanta
The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements
title The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements
title_full The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements
title_fullStr The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements
title_full_unstemmed The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements
title_short The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements
title_sort role of the location of personal exposimeters on the human body in their use for assessing exposure to the electromagnetic field in the radiofrequency range 98–2450 mhz and compliance analysis: evaluation by virtual measurements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/272460
work_keys_str_mv AT gryzkrzysztof theroleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements
AT zradzinskipatryk theroleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements
AT karpowiczjolanta theroleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements
AT gryzkrzysztof roleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements
AT zradzinskipatryk roleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements
AT karpowiczjolanta roleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements