Cargando…
The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements
The use of radiofrequency (98–2450 MHz range) personal exposimeters to measure the electric field (E-field) in far-field exposure conditions was modelled numerically using human body model Gustav and finite integration technique software. Calculations with 256 models of exposure scenarios show that...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/272460 |
_version_ | 1782365342575624192 |
---|---|
author | Gryz, Krzysztof Zradziński, Patryk Karpowicz, Jolanta |
author_facet | Gryz, Krzysztof Zradziński, Patryk Karpowicz, Jolanta |
author_sort | Gryz, Krzysztof |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of radiofrequency (98–2450 MHz range) personal exposimeters to measure the electric field (E-field) in far-field exposure conditions was modelled numerically using human body model Gustav and finite integration technique software. Calculations with 256 models of exposure scenarios show that the human body has a significant influence on the results of measurements using a single body-worn exposimeter in various locations near the body ((from −96 to +133)%, measurement errors with respect to the unperturbed E-field value). When an exposure assessment involves the exposure limitations provided for the strength of an unperturbed E-field. To improve the application of exposimeters in compliance tests, such discrepancies in the results of measurements by a body-worn exposimeter may be compensated by using of a correction factor applied to the measurement results or alternatively to the exposure limit values. The location of a single exposimeter on the waist to the back side of the human body or on the front of the chest reduces the range of exposure assessments uncertainty (covering various exposure conditions). However, still the uncertainty of exposure assessments using a single exposimeter remains significantly higher than the assessment of the unperturbed E-field using spot measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4387911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43879112015-04-15 The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements Gryz, Krzysztof Zradziński, Patryk Karpowicz, Jolanta Biomed Res Int Research Article The use of radiofrequency (98–2450 MHz range) personal exposimeters to measure the electric field (E-field) in far-field exposure conditions was modelled numerically using human body model Gustav and finite integration technique software. Calculations with 256 models of exposure scenarios show that the human body has a significant influence on the results of measurements using a single body-worn exposimeter in various locations near the body ((from −96 to +133)%, measurement errors with respect to the unperturbed E-field value). When an exposure assessment involves the exposure limitations provided for the strength of an unperturbed E-field. To improve the application of exposimeters in compliance tests, such discrepancies in the results of measurements by a body-worn exposimeter may be compensated by using of a correction factor applied to the measurement results or alternatively to the exposure limit values. The location of a single exposimeter on the waist to the back side of the human body or on the front of the chest reduces the range of exposure assessments uncertainty (covering various exposure conditions). However, still the uncertainty of exposure assessments using a single exposimeter remains significantly higher than the assessment of the unperturbed E-field using spot measurements. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4387911/ /pubmed/25879021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/272460 Text en Copyright © 2015 Krzysztof Gryz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gryz, Krzysztof Zradziński, Patryk Karpowicz, Jolanta The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements |
title | The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements |
title_full | The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements |
title_fullStr | The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements |
title_short | The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements |
title_sort | role of the location of personal exposimeters on the human body in their use for assessing exposure to the electromagnetic field in the radiofrequency range 98–2450 mhz and compliance analysis: evaluation by virtual measurements |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/272460 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gryzkrzysztof theroleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements AT zradzinskipatryk theroleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements AT karpowiczjolanta theroleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements AT gryzkrzysztof roleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements AT zradzinskipatryk roleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements AT karpowiczjolanta roleofthelocationofpersonalexposimetersonthehumanbodyintheiruseforassessingexposuretotheelectromagneticfieldintheradiofrequencyrange982450mhzandcomplianceanalysisevaluationbyvirtualmeasurements |