Cargando…

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Two-Unit Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different framework materials on biomechanical behaviour of anterior two-unit cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs). A three-dimensional finite element model of a two-unit cantilever RBFDP replacing a maxillary lateral incisor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keulemans, Filip, Shinya, Akikazu, Lassila, Lippo V. J., Vallittu, Pekka K., Kleverlaan, Cornelis J., Feilzer, Albert J., De Moor, Roeland J. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/864389
_version_ 1782365342797922304
author Keulemans, Filip
Shinya, Akikazu
Lassila, Lippo V. J.
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.
Feilzer, Albert J.
De Moor, Roeland J. G.
author_facet Keulemans, Filip
Shinya, Akikazu
Lassila, Lippo V. J.
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.
Feilzer, Albert J.
De Moor, Roeland J. G.
author_sort Keulemans, Filip
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different framework materials on biomechanical behaviour of anterior two-unit cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs). A three-dimensional finite element model of a two-unit cantilever RBFDP replacing a maxillary lateral incisor was created. Five framework materials were evaluated: direct fibre-reinforced composite (FRC-Z250), indirect fibre-reinforced composite (FRC-ES), gold alloy (M), glass ceramic (GC), and zirconia (ZI). Finite element analysis was performed and stress distribution was evaluated. A similar stress pattern, with stress concentrations in the connector area, was observed in RBFDPs for all materials. Maximal principal stress showed a decreasing order: ZI > M > GC > FRC-ES > FRC-Z250. The maximum displacement of RBFDPs was higher for FRC-Z250 and FRC-ES than for M, GC, and ZI. FE analysis depicted differences in location of the maximum stress at the luting cement interface between materials. For FRC-Z250 and FRC-ES, the maximum stress was located in the upper part of the proximal area of the retainer, whereas, for M, GC, and ZI, the maximum stress was located at the cervical outline of the retainer. The present study revealed differences in biomechanical behaviour between all RBFDPs. The general observation was that a RBFDP made of FRC provided a more favourable stress distribution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4387912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43879122015-04-15 Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Two-Unit Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses Keulemans, Filip Shinya, Akikazu Lassila, Lippo V. J. Vallittu, Pekka K. Kleverlaan, Cornelis J. Feilzer, Albert J. De Moor, Roeland J. G. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different framework materials on biomechanical behaviour of anterior two-unit cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs). A three-dimensional finite element model of a two-unit cantilever RBFDP replacing a maxillary lateral incisor was created. Five framework materials were evaluated: direct fibre-reinforced composite (FRC-Z250), indirect fibre-reinforced composite (FRC-ES), gold alloy (M), glass ceramic (GC), and zirconia (ZI). Finite element analysis was performed and stress distribution was evaluated. A similar stress pattern, with stress concentrations in the connector area, was observed in RBFDPs for all materials. Maximal principal stress showed a decreasing order: ZI > M > GC > FRC-ES > FRC-Z250. The maximum displacement of RBFDPs was higher for FRC-Z250 and FRC-ES than for M, GC, and ZI. FE analysis depicted differences in location of the maximum stress at the luting cement interface between materials. For FRC-Z250 and FRC-ES, the maximum stress was located in the upper part of the proximal area of the retainer, whereas, for M, GC, and ZI, the maximum stress was located at the cervical outline of the retainer. The present study revealed differences in biomechanical behaviour between all RBFDPs. The general observation was that a RBFDP made of FRC provided a more favourable stress distribution. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4387912/ /pubmed/25879077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/864389 Text en Copyright © 2015 Filip Keulemans et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Keulemans, Filip
Shinya, Akikazu
Lassila, Lippo V. J.
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.
Feilzer, Albert J.
De Moor, Roeland J. G.
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Two-Unit Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses
title Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Two-Unit Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses
title_full Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Two-Unit Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses
title_fullStr Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Two-Unit Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses
title_full_unstemmed Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Two-Unit Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses
title_short Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Two-Unit Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses
title_sort three-dimensional finite element analysis of anterior two-unit cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/864389
work_keys_str_mv AT keulemansfilip threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriortwounitcantileverresinbondedfixeddentalprostheses
AT shinyaakikazu threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriortwounitcantileverresinbondedfixeddentalprostheses
AT lassilalippovj threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriortwounitcantileverresinbondedfixeddentalprostheses
AT vallittupekkak threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriortwounitcantileverresinbondedfixeddentalprostheses
AT kleverlaancornelisj threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriortwounitcantileverresinbondedfixeddentalprostheses
AT feilzeralbertj threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriortwounitcantileverresinbondedfixeddentalprostheses
AT demoorroelandjg threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofanteriortwounitcantileverresinbondedfixeddentalprostheses