Cargando…

Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose. The present study investigated which type of adenocarcinoma with BAC features was prone to be false-negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods. A retrospective study was performed on 51 consecutive patients with localized adenocarcinoma with BAC features. CT and PET were assessed for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Hu-bing, Wang, Lijuan, Wang, Quan-shi, Han, Yan-jian, Li, Hong-sheng, Zhou, Wen-lan, Tian, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/243681
_version_ 1782365355741544448
author Wu, Hu-bing
Wang, Lijuan
Wang, Quan-shi
Han, Yan-jian
Li, Hong-sheng
Zhou, Wen-lan
Tian, Ying
author_facet Wu, Hu-bing
Wang, Lijuan
Wang, Quan-shi
Han, Yan-jian
Li, Hong-sheng
Zhou, Wen-lan
Tian, Ying
author_sort Wu, Hu-bing
collection PubMed
description Purpose. The present study investigated which type of adenocarcinoma with BAC features was prone to be false-negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods. A retrospective study was performed on 51 consecutive patients with localized adenocarcinoma with BAC features. CT and PET were assessed for lesion size, GGO percentage, and SUVmax. Lesions with FDG uptake the same as or more than mediastinal blood-pool activity were considered as PET-positive. Results. Of the 51 cases, 19.6% presented as pure GGO nodules, 31.4% as mixed nodules, and 49.0% as solid nodules. None of the pure GGO nodules was 18F-FDG avid, compared with 37.5% of mixed nodules and 96.0% of solid nodules (χ (2) = 31.55, P = 0.000). In the mixed nodule group, SUVmax was negatively correlated with GGO percentage (r = −0.588; P = 0.021). The positive detection rate of 18F-FDG PET/CT was 50.0%, 55.6%, and 100% in tumors 1.1–2.0 cm, 2.1–3.0 cm, and >3.0 cm in diameter, respectively (χ (2) = 5.815, P = 0.055). General linear model factor analysis showed that the GGO was an important factor contributing to false-negative PET/CT results (F = 23.992, P = 0.000), but lesion size was not (F = 0.602, P = 0.866). Conclusions. The present study indicated that the adenocarcinoma with BAC features presented as nonsolid nodule is prone to be false negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4387969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43879692015-04-15 Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT Wu, Hu-bing Wang, Lijuan Wang, Quan-shi Han, Yan-jian Li, Hong-sheng Zhou, Wen-lan Tian, Ying Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. The present study investigated which type of adenocarcinoma with BAC features was prone to be false-negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods. A retrospective study was performed on 51 consecutive patients with localized adenocarcinoma with BAC features. CT and PET were assessed for lesion size, GGO percentage, and SUVmax. Lesions with FDG uptake the same as or more than mediastinal blood-pool activity were considered as PET-positive. Results. Of the 51 cases, 19.6% presented as pure GGO nodules, 31.4% as mixed nodules, and 49.0% as solid nodules. None of the pure GGO nodules was 18F-FDG avid, compared with 37.5% of mixed nodules and 96.0% of solid nodules (χ (2) = 31.55, P = 0.000). In the mixed nodule group, SUVmax was negatively correlated with GGO percentage (r = −0.588; P = 0.021). The positive detection rate of 18F-FDG PET/CT was 50.0%, 55.6%, and 100% in tumors 1.1–2.0 cm, 2.1–3.0 cm, and >3.0 cm in diameter, respectively (χ (2) = 5.815, P = 0.055). General linear model factor analysis showed that the GGO was an important factor contributing to false-negative PET/CT results (F = 23.992, P = 0.000), but lesion size was not (F = 0.602, P = 0.866). Conclusions. The present study indicated that the adenocarcinoma with BAC features presented as nonsolid nodule is prone to be false negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4387969/ /pubmed/25879020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/243681 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hu-bing Wu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Hu-bing
Wang, Lijuan
Wang, Quan-shi
Han, Yan-jian
Li, Hong-sheng
Zhou, Wen-lan
Tian, Ying
Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT
title Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT
title_full Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT
title_fullStr Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT
title_full_unstemmed Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT
title_short Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT
title_sort adenocarcinoma with bac features presented as the nonsolid nodule is prone to be false-negative on (18)f-fdg pet/ct
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/243681
work_keys_str_mv AT wuhubing adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct
AT wanglijuan adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct
AT wangquanshi adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct
AT hanyanjian adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct
AT lihongsheng adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct
AT zhouwenlan adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct
AT tianying adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct