Cargando…
Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT
Purpose. The present study investigated which type of adenocarcinoma with BAC features was prone to be false-negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods. A retrospective study was performed on 51 consecutive patients with localized adenocarcinoma with BAC features. CT and PET were assessed for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/243681 |
_version_ | 1782365355741544448 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Hu-bing Wang, Lijuan Wang, Quan-shi Han, Yan-jian Li, Hong-sheng Zhou, Wen-lan Tian, Ying |
author_facet | Wu, Hu-bing Wang, Lijuan Wang, Quan-shi Han, Yan-jian Li, Hong-sheng Zhou, Wen-lan Tian, Ying |
author_sort | Wu, Hu-bing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. The present study investigated which type of adenocarcinoma with BAC features was prone to be false-negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods. A retrospective study was performed on 51 consecutive patients with localized adenocarcinoma with BAC features. CT and PET were assessed for lesion size, GGO percentage, and SUVmax. Lesions with FDG uptake the same as or more than mediastinal blood-pool activity were considered as PET-positive. Results. Of the 51 cases, 19.6% presented as pure GGO nodules, 31.4% as mixed nodules, and 49.0% as solid nodules. None of the pure GGO nodules was 18F-FDG avid, compared with 37.5% of mixed nodules and 96.0% of solid nodules (χ (2) = 31.55, P = 0.000). In the mixed nodule group, SUVmax was negatively correlated with GGO percentage (r = −0.588; P = 0.021). The positive detection rate of 18F-FDG PET/CT was 50.0%, 55.6%, and 100% in tumors 1.1–2.0 cm, 2.1–3.0 cm, and >3.0 cm in diameter, respectively (χ (2) = 5.815, P = 0.055). General linear model factor analysis showed that the GGO was an important factor contributing to false-negative PET/CT results (F = 23.992, P = 0.000), but lesion size was not (F = 0.602, P = 0.866). Conclusions. The present study indicated that the adenocarcinoma with BAC features presented as nonsolid nodule is prone to be false negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4387969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43879692015-04-15 Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT Wu, Hu-bing Wang, Lijuan Wang, Quan-shi Han, Yan-jian Li, Hong-sheng Zhou, Wen-lan Tian, Ying Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. The present study investigated which type of adenocarcinoma with BAC features was prone to be false-negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods. A retrospective study was performed on 51 consecutive patients with localized adenocarcinoma with BAC features. CT and PET were assessed for lesion size, GGO percentage, and SUVmax. Lesions with FDG uptake the same as or more than mediastinal blood-pool activity were considered as PET-positive. Results. Of the 51 cases, 19.6% presented as pure GGO nodules, 31.4% as mixed nodules, and 49.0% as solid nodules. None of the pure GGO nodules was 18F-FDG avid, compared with 37.5% of mixed nodules and 96.0% of solid nodules (χ (2) = 31.55, P = 0.000). In the mixed nodule group, SUVmax was negatively correlated with GGO percentage (r = −0.588; P = 0.021). The positive detection rate of 18F-FDG PET/CT was 50.0%, 55.6%, and 100% in tumors 1.1–2.0 cm, 2.1–3.0 cm, and >3.0 cm in diameter, respectively (χ (2) = 5.815, P = 0.055). General linear model factor analysis showed that the GGO was an important factor contributing to false-negative PET/CT results (F = 23.992, P = 0.000), but lesion size was not (F = 0.602, P = 0.866). Conclusions. The present study indicated that the adenocarcinoma with BAC features presented as nonsolid nodule is prone to be false negative on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4387969/ /pubmed/25879020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/243681 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hu-bing Wu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Hu-bing Wang, Lijuan Wang, Quan-shi Han, Yan-jian Li, Hong-sheng Zhou, Wen-lan Tian, Ying Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT |
title | Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT |
title_full | Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT |
title_fullStr | Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT |
title_short | Adenocarcinoma with BAC Features Presented as the Nonsolid Nodule Is Prone to Be False-Negative on (18)F-FDG PET/CT |
title_sort | adenocarcinoma with bac features presented as the nonsolid nodule is prone to be false-negative on (18)f-fdg pet/ct |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/243681 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuhubing adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct AT wanglijuan adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct AT wangquanshi adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct AT hanyanjian adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct AT lihongsheng adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct AT zhouwenlan adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct AT tianying adenocarcinomawithbacfeaturespresentedasthenonsolidnoduleispronetobefalsenegativeon18ffdgpetct |