Cargando…

Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT — a two centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND. Incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid on PET-CT examinations represents a diagnostic challenge. The maximal standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) is one possible parameter that can help in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid PET lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamsek, Jan, Zagar, Ivana, Gaberscek, Simona, Grmek, Marko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Versita, Warsaw 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26029022
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2014-0039
_version_ 1782365359728230400
author Jamsek, Jan
Zagar, Ivana
Gaberscek, Simona
Grmek, Marko
author_facet Jamsek, Jan
Zagar, Ivana
Gaberscek, Simona
Grmek, Marko
author_sort Jamsek, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid on PET-CT examinations represents a diagnostic challenge. The maximal standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) is one possible parameter that can help in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid PET lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We retrospectively evaluated (18)F-FDG PET-CT examinations of 5,911 patients performed at two different medical centres from 2010 to 2011. If pathologically increased activity was accidentally detected in the thyroid, the SUV(max) of the thyroid lesion was calculated. Patients with incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid were instructed to visit a thyroidologist, who performed further investigation including fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) if needed. Lesions deemed suspicious after FNAC were referred for surgery. RESULTS. Incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid was found in 3.89% — in 230 out of 5,911 patients investigated on PET-CT. Malignant thyroid lesions (represented with focal thyroid uptake) were detected in 10 of 66 patients (in 15.2%). In the first medical centre the SUV(max) of 36 benign lesions was 5.6 ± 2.8 compared to 15.8 ± 9.2 of 5 malignant lesions (p < 0.001). In the second centre the SUV(max) of 20 benign lesions was 3.7 ± 2.2 compared to 5.1 ± 2.3 of 5 malignant lesions (p = 0.217). All 29 further investigated diffuse thyroid lesions were benign. CONCLUSIONS. Incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid was found in 3.89% of patients who had a PET-CT examination. Only focal thyroid uptake represented a malignant lesion in our study — in 15.2% of all focal thyroid lesions. SUV(max) should only serve as one of several parameters that alert the clinician on the possibility of thyroid malignancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4387987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Versita, Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43879872015-06-01 Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT — a two centre retrospective study Jamsek, Jan Zagar, Ivana Gaberscek, Simona Grmek, Marko Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND. Incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid on PET-CT examinations represents a diagnostic challenge. The maximal standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) is one possible parameter that can help in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid PET lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We retrospectively evaluated (18)F-FDG PET-CT examinations of 5,911 patients performed at two different medical centres from 2010 to 2011. If pathologically increased activity was accidentally detected in the thyroid, the SUV(max) of the thyroid lesion was calculated. Patients with incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid were instructed to visit a thyroidologist, who performed further investigation including fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) if needed. Lesions deemed suspicious after FNAC were referred for surgery. RESULTS. Incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid was found in 3.89% — in 230 out of 5,911 patients investigated on PET-CT. Malignant thyroid lesions (represented with focal thyroid uptake) were detected in 10 of 66 patients (in 15.2%). In the first medical centre the SUV(max) of 36 benign lesions was 5.6 ± 2.8 compared to 15.8 ± 9.2 of 5 malignant lesions (p < 0.001). In the second centre the SUV(max) of 20 benign lesions was 3.7 ± 2.2 compared to 5.1 ± 2.3 of 5 malignant lesions (p = 0.217). All 29 further investigated diffuse thyroid lesions were benign. CONCLUSIONS. Incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid was found in 3.89% of patients who had a PET-CT examination. Only focal thyroid uptake represented a malignant lesion in our study — in 15.2% of all focal thyroid lesions. SUV(max) should only serve as one of several parameters that alert the clinician on the possibility of thyroid malignancy. Versita, Warsaw 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4387987/ /pubmed/26029022 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2014-0039 Text en Copyright © by Association of Radiology & Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Jamsek, Jan
Zagar, Ivana
Gaberscek, Simona
Grmek, Marko
Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT — a two centre retrospective study
title Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT — a two centre retrospective study
title_full Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT — a two centre retrospective study
title_fullStr Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT — a two centre retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT — a two centre retrospective study
title_short Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT — a two centre retrospective study
title_sort thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)f-fdg pet-ct — a two centre retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4387987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26029022
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2014-0039
work_keys_str_mv AT jamsekjan thyroidlesionsincidentallydetectedby18ffdgpetctatwocentreretrospectivestudy
AT zagarivana thyroidlesionsincidentallydetectedby18ffdgpetctatwocentreretrospectivestudy
AT gabersceksimona thyroidlesionsincidentallydetectedby18ffdgpetctatwocentreretrospectivestudy
AT grmekmarko thyroidlesionsincidentallydetectedby18ffdgpetctatwocentreretrospectivestudy