Cargando…

Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: We compared the motor evoked potential (MEP) phases using transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), their relatives, and healthy controls, hypothesizing that patients and their unaffected relatives may share a subtle pathophysiologic abnorma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chowdhury, Fahmida A., Pawley, Adam D., Ceronie, Bryan, Nashef, Lina, Elwes, Robert D.C., Richardson, Mark P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4388750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25740859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001413
_version_ 1782365437490626560
author Chowdhury, Fahmida A.
Pawley, Adam D.
Ceronie, Bryan
Nashef, Lina
Elwes, Robert D.C.
Richardson, Mark P.
author_facet Chowdhury, Fahmida A.
Pawley, Adam D.
Ceronie, Bryan
Nashef, Lina
Elwes, Robert D.C.
Richardson, Mark P.
author_sort Chowdhury, Fahmida A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We compared the motor evoked potential (MEP) phases using transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), their relatives, and healthy controls, hypothesizing that patients and their unaffected relatives may share a subtle pathophysiologic abnormality. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we investigated 23 patients with IGE, 34 first-degree relatives, and 30 matched healthy controls. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was performed to produce a series of suprathreshold single-pulse MEPs. A semiautomated method was used to count phases. We compared between groups the mean number of MEP phases, the stimulus-to-stimulus variability in MEP phases, and the proportion of polyphasic MEPs within subjects. RESULTS: Patients with IGE and their relatives had a significantly increased number of MEP phases (median for patients 2.24, relatives 2.17, controls 2.01) and a significantly higher proportion of MEPs with more than 2 phases than controls (median for patients 0.118, relatives 0.088, controls 0.013). Patients had a greater stimulus-to-stimulus variability in number of MEP phases than controls. There were no differences between patients and relatives. CONCLUSION: Increased MEP polyphasia in patients with IGE and their first-degree relatives may reflect transient abnormal evoked oscillations. The presence of polyphasic MEPs in relatives as well as patients suggests that MEP polyphasia is not related to treatment, and is in isolation insufficient to predispose to epilepsy. Polyphasic MEP may be a novel endophenotype in IGE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4388750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43887502015-04-09 Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy Chowdhury, Fahmida A. Pawley, Adam D. Ceronie, Bryan Nashef, Lina Elwes, Robert D.C. Richardson, Mark P. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: We compared the motor evoked potential (MEP) phases using transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), their relatives, and healthy controls, hypothesizing that patients and their unaffected relatives may share a subtle pathophysiologic abnormality. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we investigated 23 patients with IGE, 34 first-degree relatives, and 30 matched healthy controls. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was performed to produce a series of suprathreshold single-pulse MEPs. A semiautomated method was used to count phases. We compared between groups the mean number of MEP phases, the stimulus-to-stimulus variability in MEP phases, and the proportion of polyphasic MEPs within subjects. RESULTS: Patients with IGE and their relatives had a significantly increased number of MEP phases (median for patients 2.24, relatives 2.17, controls 2.01) and a significantly higher proportion of MEPs with more than 2 phases than controls (median for patients 0.118, relatives 0.088, controls 0.013). Patients had a greater stimulus-to-stimulus variability in number of MEP phases than controls. There were no differences between patients and relatives. CONCLUSION: Increased MEP polyphasia in patients with IGE and their first-degree relatives may reflect transient abnormal evoked oscillations. The presence of polyphasic MEPs in relatives as well as patients suggests that MEP polyphasia is not related to treatment, and is in isolation insufficient to predispose to epilepsy. Polyphasic MEP may be a novel endophenotype in IGE. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4388750/ /pubmed/25740859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001413 Text en © 2015 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Chowdhury, Fahmida A.
Pawley, Adam D.
Ceronie, Bryan
Nashef, Lina
Elwes, Robert D.C.
Richardson, Mark P.
Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy
title Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy
title_full Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy
title_fullStr Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy
title_short Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy
title_sort motor evoked potential polyphasia: a novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4388750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25740859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001413
work_keys_str_mv AT chowdhuryfahmidaa motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy
AT pawleyadamd motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy
AT ceroniebryan motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy
AT nasheflina motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy
AT elwesrobertdc motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy
AT richardsonmarkp motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy