Cargando…
Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy
OBJECTIVE: We compared the motor evoked potential (MEP) phases using transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), their relatives, and healthy controls, hypothesizing that patients and their unaffected relatives may share a subtle pathophysiologic abnorma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4388750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25740859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001413 |
_version_ | 1782365437490626560 |
---|---|
author | Chowdhury, Fahmida A. Pawley, Adam D. Ceronie, Bryan Nashef, Lina Elwes, Robert D.C. Richardson, Mark P. |
author_facet | Chowdhury, Fahmida A. Pawley, Adam D. Ceronie, Bryan Nashef, Lina Elwes, Robert D.C. Richardson, Mark P. |
author_sort | Chowdhury, Fahmida A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We compared the motor evoked potential (MEP) phases using transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), their relatives, and healthy controls, hypothesizing that patients and their unaffected relatives may share a subtle pathophysiologic abnormality. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we investigated 23 patients with IGE, 34 first-degree relatives, and 30 matched healthy controls. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was performed to produce a series of suprathreshold single-pulse MEPs. A semiautomated method was used to count phases. We compared between groups the mean number of MEP phases, the stimulus-to-stimulus variability in MEP phases, and the proportion of polyphasic MEPs within subjects. RESULTS: Patients with IGE and their relatives had a significantly increased number of MEP phases (median for patients 2.24, relatives 2.17, controls 2.01) and a significantly higher proportion of MEPs with more than 2 phases than controls (median for patients 0.118, relatives 0.088, controls 0.013). Patients had a greater stimulus-to-stimulus variability in number of MEP phases than controls. There were no differences between patients and relatives. CONCLUSION: Increased MEP polyphasia in patients with IGE and their first-degree relatives may reflect transient abnormal evoked oscillations. The presence of polyphasic MEPs in relatives as well as patients suggests that MEP polyphasia is not related to treatment, and is in isolation insufficient to predispose to epilepsy. Polyphasic MEP may be a novel endophenotype in IGE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4388750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43887502015-04-09 Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy Chowdhury, Fahmida A. Pawley, Adam D. Ceronie, Bryan Nashef, Lina Elwes, Robert D.C. Richardson, Mark P. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: We compared the motor evoked potential (MEP) phases using transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), their relatives, and healthy controls, hypothesizing that patients and their unaffected relatives may share a subtle pathophysiologic abnormality. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we investigated 23 patients with IGE, 34 first-degree relatives, and 30 matched healthy controls. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was performed to produce a series of suprathreshold single-pulse MEPs. A semiautomated method was used to count phases. We compared between groups the mean number of MEP phases, the stimulus-to-stimulus variability in MEP phases, and the proportion of polyphasic MEPs within subjects. RESULTS: Patients with IGE and their relatives had a significantly increased number of MEP phases (median for patients 2.24, relatives 2.17, controls 2.01) and a significantly higher proportion of MEPs with more than 2 phases than controls (median for patients 0.118, relatives 0.088, controls 0.013). Patients had a greater stimulus-to-stimulus variability in number of MEP phases than controls. There were no differences between patients and relatives. CONCLUSION: Increased MEP polyphasia in patients with IGE and their first-degree relatives may reflect transient abnormal evoked oscillations. The presence of polyphasic MEPs in relatives as well as patients suggests that MEP polyphasia is not related to treatment, and is in isolation insufficient to predispose to epilepsy. Polyphasic MEP may be a novel endophenotype in IGE. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4388750/ /pubmed/25740859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001413 Text en © 2015 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Chowdhury, Fahmida A. Pawley, Adam D. Ceronie, Bryan Nashef, Lina Elwes, Robert D.C. Richardson, Mark P. Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy |
title | Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy |
title_full | Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy |
title_fullStr | Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy |
title_short | Motor evoked potential polyphasia: A novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy |
title_sort | motor evoked potential polyphasia: a novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4388750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25740859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001413 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowdhuryfahmidaa motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy AT pawleyadamd motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy AT ceroniebryan motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy AT nasheflina motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy AT elwesrobertdc motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy AT richardsonmarkp motorevokedpotentialpolyphasiaanovelendophenotypeofidiopathicgeneralizedepilepsy |