Cargando…

Monitor height ergonomics: A comparison of operating room video display terminals

A surgeon's eyes should be positioned 1 meter (m) distant and no more than 15° below the top of an operating monitor (0.27 m). We sought to determine which operating room video display terminal can best accommodate ergonomically optimized gaze during surgery. Floor to eye height was measured fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelts, Gregory I., McMains, Kevin C., Chen, Phillip G., Weitzel, Erik K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: OceanSide Publications, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4388873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25860168
http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2015.6.0119
_version_ 1782365451474436096
author Kelts, Gregory I.
McMains, Kevin C.
Chen, Phillip G.
Weitzel, Erik K.
author_facet Kelts, Gregory I.
McMains, Kevin C.
Chen, Phillip G.
Weitzel, Erik K.
author_sort Kelts, Gregory I.
collection PubMed
description A surgeon's eyes should be positioned 1 meter (m) distant and no more than 15° below the top of an operating monitor (0.27 m). We sought to determine which operating room video display terminal can best accommodate ergonomically optimized gaze during surgery. Floor to eye height was measured for surgeons in seated, perched, and standing positions. These ranges were then compared to vertical displacement ranges for monitors measured from floor to top of the screen. Eye height was measured for standing (1.56–1.80 m), perched (1.40–1.65 m), and seated (1.10–1.32 m) positions. The minimum distance (min) between the floor and the top of the monitor and the vertical mobility range (VR) of the monitor were measured throughout a tertiary medical center including towers with boom arms (TcB) (min: 1.58 m, VR: 0.37 m), towers without booms (TsB) (min: 1.82 m, VR: 0.025 m), ceiling mounted booms (CMB) (min: 1.34 m:, VR: 1.04 m), and portable monitors (PM) (min: 1.73 m, VR: 0.04 m). The tangent of 15° declination was used to calculate a correction factor to determine the minimum optimal ergonomic display height. The correction factor was subtracted from the eye height at each position to determine the lowest target height and the highest target floor to eye distance for each position. Analysis of variance with least significant difference post hoc testing identified all minimum distances and vertical ranges to be statistically different (p < 0.001). Monitor vertical displacement varied between styles of carts. CMB video display terminal systems can accommodate standing, perched and the tallest seated surgeons. TcB, TsB and PM systems cannot adequately accommodate all standing, perched or seated surgeons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4388873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher OceanSide Publications, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43888732015-04-10 Monitor height ergonomics: A comparison of operating room video display terminals Kelts, Gregory I. McMains, Kevin C. Chen, Phillip G. Weitzel, Erik K. Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Articles A surgeon's eyes should be positioned 1 meter (m) distant and no more than 15° below the top of an operating monitor (0.27 m). We sought to determine which operating room video display terminal can best accommodate ergonomically optimized gaze during surgery. Floor to eye height was measured for surgeons in seated, perched, and standing positions. These ranges were then compared to vertical displacement ranges for monitors measured from floor to top of the screen. Eye height was measured for standing (1.56–1.80 m), perched (1.40–1.65 m), and seated (1.10–1.32 m) positions. The minimum distance (min) between the floor and the top of the monitor and the vertical mobility range (VR) of the monitor were measured throughout a tertiary medical center including towers with boom arms (TcB) (min: 1.58 m, VR: 0.37 m), towers without booms (TsB) (min: 1.82 m, VR: 0.025 m), ceiling mounted booms (CMB) (min: 1.34 m:, VR: 1.04 m), and portable monitors (PM) (min: 1.73 m, VR: 0.04 m). The tangent of 15° declination was used to calculate a correction factor to determine the minimum optimal ergonomic display height. The correction factor was subtracted from the eye height at each position to determine the lowest target height and the highest target floor to eye distance for each position. Analysis of variance with least significant difference post hoc testing identified all minimum distances and vertical ranges to be statistically different (p < 0.001). Monitor vertical displacement varied between styles of carts. CMB video display terminal systems can accommodate standing, perched and the tallest seated surgeons. TcB, TsB and PM systems cannot adequately accommodate all standing, perched or seated surgeons. OceanSide Publications, Inc. 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4388873/ /pubmed/25860168 http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2015.6.0119 Text en Copyright © 2015, OceanSide Publications, Inc., U.S.A. This publication is provided under the terms of the Creative Commons Public License ("CCPL" or "License"), in attribution 3.0 unported (Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND)), further described at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. The work is protected by copyright and/or other applicable law. Any use of the work other then as authorized under this license or copyright law is prohibited.
spellingShingle Articles
Kelts, Gregory I.
McMains, Kevin C.
Chen, Phillip G.
Weitzel, Erik K.
Monitor height ergonomics: A comparison of operating room video display terminals
title Monitor height ergonomics: A comparison of operating room video display terminals
title_full Monitor height ergonomics: A comparison of operating room video display terminals
title_fullStr Monitor height ergonomics: A comparison of operating room video display terminals
title_full_unstemmed Monitor height ergonomics: A comparison of operating room video display terminals
title_short Monitor height ergonomics: A comparison of operating room video display terminals
title_sort monitor height ergonomics: a comparison of operating room video display terminals
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4388873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25860168
http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2015.6.0119
work_keys_str_mv AT keltsgregoryi monitorheightergonomicsacomparisonofoperatingroomvideodisplayterminals
AT mcmainskevinc monitorheightergonomicsacomparisonofoperatingroomvideodisplayterminals
AT chenphillipg monitorheightergonomicsacomparisonofoperatingroomvideodisplayterminals
AT weitzelerikk monitorheightergonomicsacomparisonofoperatingroomvideodisplayterminals