Cargando…

Diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults

The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies in individuals with a case-mix of subjects with thyroid disease representing that of the general population. We measured thyroid microsome (TMA), thyroid peroxidase (TPO), thyroglobulin (TGA) and thyroid-stimu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosi, Emanuele, Bianchi, Roberto, Ruotolo, Giacomo, Bazzigaluppi, Elena, Belloni, Cristina, Calori, Giliola, Girardi, Anna Maria, Garancini, Maria Paola, Scavini, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26000111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13317-010-0012-6
_version_ 1782365475909402624
author Bosi, Emanuele
Bianchi, Roberto
Ruotolo, Giacomo
Bazzigaluppi, Elena
Belloni, Cristina
Calori, Giliola
Girardi, Anna Maria
Garancini, Maria Paola
Scavini, Marina
author_facet Bosi, Emanuele
Bianchi, Roberto
Ruotolo, Giacomo
Bazzigaluppi, Elena
Belloni, Cristina
Calori, Giliola
Girardi, Anna Maria
Garancini, Maria Paola
Scavini, Marina
author_sort Bosi, Emanuele
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies in individuals with a case-mix of subjects with thyroid disease representing that of the general population. We measured thyroid microsome (TMA), thyroid peroxidase (TPO), thyroglobulin (TGA) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor (TRA) autoantibodies in subjects in the bottom (hyperthyroid end) and top (hypothyroid end) four percentiles of the TSH distribution from among participants in a population-based survey of individuals aged ≥40 years (the Cremona Study). TMA and TPO were the most sensitive autoantibodies in subjects in both the bottom percentiles (19.8% and 18.5%, respectively) and the top percentiles (51.2% and 53.8%, respectively) of the TSH distribution. TMA and TPO showed good agreement (kappa statistics 87.8%, 95% CI 80.1–95.5%) at both ends of the TSH distribution. TGA were the next most sensitive marker, although seldom detected if TMA or TPO were not present. TRA were detected only at the extremes of the TSH distribution (1st percentile, 31.8%; 100th percentile, 25.0%). We conclude that, among a case-mix of individuals with thyroid disease representing that of the general population, TMA and TPO are the most sensitive markers of thyroid disease. TGA only marginally increased the diagnostic sensitivity of TMA and TPO. TRA are sensitive markers of thyroid disease only at the extremes of thyroid function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4389046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43890462015-05-21 Diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults Bosi, Emanuele Bianchi, Roberto Ruotolo, Giacomo Bazzigaluppi, Elena Belloni, Cristina Calori, Giliola Girardi, Anna Maria Garancini, Maria Paola Scavini, Marina Auto Immun Highlights Original Article The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies in individuals with a case-mix of subjects with thyroid disease representing that of the general population. We measured thyroid microsome (TMA), thyroid peroxidase (TPO), thyroglobulin (TGA) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor (TRA) autoantibodies in subjects in the bottom (hyperthyroid end) and top (hypothyroid end) four percentiles of the TSH distribution from among participants in a population-based survey of individuals aged ≥40 years (the Cremona Study). TMA and TPO were the most sensitive autoantibodies in subjects in both the bottom percentiles (19.8% and 18.5%, respectively) and the top percentiles (51.2% and 53.8%, respectively) of the TSH distribution. TMA and TPO showed good agreement (kappa statistics 87.8%, 95% CI 80.1–95.5%) at both ends of the TSH distribution. TGA were the next most sensitive marker, although seldom detected if TMA or TPO were not present. TRA were detected only at the extremes of the TSH distribution (1st percentile, 31.8%; 100th percentile, 25.0%). We conclude that, among a case-mix of individuals with thyroid disease representing that of the general population, TMA and TPO are the most sensitive markers of thyroid disease. TGA only marginally increased the diagnostic sensitivity of TMA and TPO. TRA are sensitive markers of thyroid disease only at the extremes of thyroid function. Springer International Publishing 2010-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4389046/ /pubmed/26000111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13317-010-0012-6 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2010
spellingShingle Original Article
Bosi, Emanuele
Bianchi, Roberto
Ruotolo, Giacomo
Bazzigaluppi, Elena
Belloni, Cristina
Calori, Giliola
Girardi, Anna Maria
Garancini, Maria Paola
Scavini, Marina
Diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults
title Diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults
title_full Diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults
title_fullStr Diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults
title_short Diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults
title_sort diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26000111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13317-010-0012-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bosiemanuele diagnosticsensitivityofthyroidautoantibodiesassessedinapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyinadults
AT bianchiroberto diagnosticsensitivityofthyroidautoantibodiesassessedinapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyinadults
AT ruotologiacomo diagnosticsensitivityofthyroidautoantibodiesassessedinapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyinadults
AT bazzigaluppielena diagnosticsensitivityofthyroidautoantibodiesassessedinapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyinadults
AT bellonicristina diagnosticsensitivityofthyroidautoantibodiesassessedinapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyinadults
AT calorigiliola diagnosticsensitivityofthyroidautoantibodiesassessedinapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyinadults
AT girardiannamaria diagnosticsensitivityofthyroidautoantibodiesassessedinapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyinadults
AT garancinimariapaola diagnosticsensitivityofthyroidautoantibodiesassessedinapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyinadults
AT scavinimarina diagnosticsensitivityofthyroidautoantibodiesassessedinapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyinadults