Cargando…

Efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study

The putative causes of bruxism are multifactorial and there are no definite measures for bruxism management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of biofeedback therapy on sleep bruxism, compared with occlusal splint. Twenty-four volunteers with sleep bruxism were divided into two grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, WeiPing, Yang, Jie, Zhang, FeiMin, Yin, XinMin, Wei, XiaoLong, Wang, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859272
http://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.28.20130145
_version_ 1782365492463271936
author Gu, WeiPing
Yang, Jie
Zhang, FeiMin
Yin, XinMin
Wei, XiaoLong
Wang, Chen
author_facet Gu, WeiPing
Yang, Jie
Zhang, FeiMin
Yin, XinMin
Wei, XiaoLong
Wang, Chen
author_sort Gu, WeiPing
collection PubMed
description The putative causes of bruxism are multifactorial and there are no definite measures for bruxism management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of biofeedback therapy on sleep bruxism, compared with occlusal splint. Twenty-four volunteers with sleep bruxism were divided into two groups: the GTB group that were treated with biofeedback therapy (n  = 12) and the GTO group that were treated with occlusal splint (n  = 12). A mini pressure sensor integrated with a monitoring circuit by use of a maxillary biofeedback splint was fabricated. To foster the relaxation of the masticatory muscles and the nervous system, the wireless device received signals from bruxism events and vibrations alerted the bruxer when the threshold was exceeded. Total episodes and average duration of bruxism events during 8 hours of sleep were analyzed with the monitoring program (TRMY1.0). After 6 and 12 weeks, the episodes (P  =  0.001) and duration (P < 0.05) in the GTB group declined dramatically. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the GTO group after the treatment (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the episodes had significant differences between the GTB group and the GTO group after the same period of treatment (P  =  0.000). The results suggest that biofeedback therapy may be an effective and convenient measure for mild bruxers, when compared with occlusal splint therapy. The mini wireless biofeedback method may be of value for the diagnosis and management of bruxism in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4389117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43891172015-04-09 Efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study Gu, WeiPing Yang, Jie Zhang, FeiMin Yin, XinMin Wei, XiaoLong Wang, Chen J Biomed Res Original Article The putative causes of bruxism are multifactorial and there are no definite measures for bruxism management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of biofeedback therapy on sleep bruxism, compared with occlusal splint. Twenty-four volunteers with sleep bruxism were divided into two groups: the GTB group that were treated with biofeedback therapy (n  = 12) and the GTO group that were treated with occlusal splint (n  = 12). A mini pressure sensor integrated with a monitoring circuit by use of a maxillary biofeedback splint was fabricated. To foster the relaxation of the masticatory muscles and the nervous system, the wireless device received signals from bruxism events and vibrations alerted the bruxer when the threshold was exceeded. Total episodes and average duration of bruxism events during 8 hours of sleep were analyzed with the monitoring program (TRMY1.0). After 6 and 12 weeks, the episodes (P  =  0.001) and duration (P < 0.05) in the GTB group declined dramatically. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the GTO group after the treatment (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the episodes had significant differences between the GTB group and the GTO group after the same period of treatment (P  =  0.000). The results suggest that biofeedback therapy may be an effective and convenient measure for mild bruxers, when compared with occlusal splint therapy. The mini wireless biofeedback method may be of value for the diagnosis and management of bruxism in the future. Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research 2015-04 2014-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4389117/ /pubmed/25859272 http://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.28.20130145 Text en 2015 the Journal of Biomedical Research. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gu, WeiPing
Yang, Jie
Zhang, FeiMin
Yin, XinMin
Wei, XiaoLong
Wang, Chen
Efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study
title Efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study
title_full Efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study
title_fullStr Efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study
title_short Efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study
title_sort efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859272
http://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.28.20130145
work_keys_str_mv AT guweiping efficacyofbiofeedbacktherapyviaaminiwirelessdeviceonsleepbruxismcontrastedwithocclusalsplintapilotstudy
AT yangjie efficacyofbiofeedbacktherapyviaaminiwirelessdeviceonsleepbruxismcontrastedwithocclusalsplintapilotstudy
AT zhangfeimin efficacyofbiofeedbacktherapyviaaminiwirelessdeviceonsleepbruxismcontrastedwithocclusalsplintapilotstudy
AT yinxinmin efficacyofbiofeedbacktherapyviaaminiwirelessdeviceonsleepbruxismcontrastedwithocclusalsplintapilotstudy
AT weixiaolong efficacyofbiofeedbacktherapyviaaminiwirelessdeviceonsleepbruxismcontrastedwithocclusalsplintapilotstudy
AT wangchen efficacyofbiofeedbacktherapyviaaminiwirelessdeviceonsleepbruxismcontrastedwithocclusalsplintapilotstudy