Cargando…

Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy

BACKGROUND: Assessment of stroke volume (SV) is often necessary in clinical and research settings. The clinically established method for SV assessment in pregnancy is echocardiography, but given its limitations, it is not always an appropriate measurement tool. Thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McIntyre, Jordan PR, Ellyett, Kevin M, Mitchell, Edwin A, Quill, Gina M, Thompson, John MD, Stewart, Alistair W, Doughty, Robert N, Stone, Peter R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5
_version_ 1782365538831302656
author McIntyre, Jordan PR
Ellyett, Kevin M
Mitchell, Edwin A
Quill, Gina M
Thompson, John MD
Stewart, Alistair W
Doughty, Robert N
Stone, Peter R
author_facet McIntyre, Jordan PR
Ellyett, Kevin M
Mitchell, Edwin A
Quill, Gina M
Thompson, John MD
Stewart, Alistair W
Doughty, Robert N
Stone, Peter R
author_sort McIntyre, Jordan PR
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of stroke volume (SV) is often necessary in clinical and research settings. The clinically established method for SV assessment in pregnancy is echocardiography, but given its limitations, it is not always an appropriate measurement tool. Thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG) allows continuous, non-invasive SV assessment. However, SV determination relies on assumptions regarding the thoracic shape that may mean the algorithm is not valid in pregnancy. The available data regarding the validity of ICG against an established reference standard using modern SV algorithms are both limited and conflicting. We aimed to test the validity of ICG in a clinically realistic setting in late pregnancy using echocardiography. METHODS: Twenty-nine women in late pregnancy underwent standard echocardiography assessments with simultaneous ICG measurement. Agreement between devices was tested using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis of the relationship between ICG and echocardiography demonstrated that the 95% limits of agreement exceeded acceptable or expected ranges. Measures of maternal and fetal anthropometry do not account for the lack of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute values of SV as determined by ICG are not valid in pregnancy. Further work is required to examine the ability of ICG to assess relative changes in maternal haemodynamics in late pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4389339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43893392015-04-09 Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy McIntyre, Jordan PR Ellyett, Kevin M Mitchell, Edwin A Quill, Gina M Thompson, John MD Stewart, Alistair W Doughty, Robert N Stone, Peter R BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of stroke volume (SV) is often necessary in clinical and research settings. The clinically established method for SV assessment in pregnancy is echocardiography, but given its limitations, it is not always an appropriate measurement tool. Thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG) allows continuous, non-invasive SV assessment. However, SV determination relies on assumptions regarding the thoracic shape that may mean the algorithm is not valid in pregnancy. The available data regarding the validity of ICG against an established reference standard using modern SV algorithms are both limited and conflicting. We aimed to test the validity of ICG in a clinically realistic setting in late pregnancy using echocardiography. METHODS: Twenty-nine women in late pregnancy underwent standard echocardiography assessments with simultaneous ICG measurement. Agreement between devices was tested using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis of the relationship between ICG and echocardiography demonstrated that the 95% limits of agreement exceeded acceptable or expected ranges. Measures of maternal and fetal anthropometry do not account for the lack of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute values of SV as determined by ICG are not valid in pregnancy. Further work is required to examine the ability of ICG to assess relative changes in maternal haemodynamics in late pregnancy. BioMed Central 2015-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4389339/ /pubmed/25886289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5 Text en © McIntyre et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McIntyre, Jordan PR
Ellyett, Kevin M
Mitchell, Edwin A
Quill, Gina M
Thompson, John MD
Stewart, Alistair W
Doughty, Robert N
Stone, Peter R
Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy
title Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy
title_full Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy
title_fullStr Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy
title_short Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy
title_sort validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mcintyrejordanpr validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy
AT ellyettkevinm validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy
AT mitchelledwina validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy
AT quillginam validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy
AT thompsonjohnmd validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy
AT stewartalistairw validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy
AT doughtyrobertn validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy
AT stonepeterr validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy
AT validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy