Cargando…
Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy
BACKGROUND: Assessment of stroke volume (SV) is often necessary in clinical and research settings. The clinically established method for SV assessment in pregnancy is echocardiography, but given its limitations, it is not always an appropriate measurement tool. Thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5 |
_version_ | 1782365538831302656 |
---|---|
author | McIntyre, Jordan PR Ellyett, Kevin M Mitchell, Edwin A Quill, Gina M Thompson, John MD Stewart, Alistair W Doughty, Robert N Stone, Peter R |
author_facet | McIntyre, Jordan PR Ellyett, Kevin M Mitchell, Edwin A Quill, Gina M Thompson, John MD Stewart, Alistair W Doughty, Robert N Stone, Peter R |
author_sort | McIntyre, Jordan PR |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessment of stroke volume (SV) is often necessary in clinical and research settings. The clinically established method for SV assessment in pregnancy is echocardiography, but given its limitations, it is not always an appropriate measurement tool. Thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG) allows continuous, non-invasive SV assessment. However, SV determination relies on assumptions regarding the thoracic shape that may mean the algorithm is not valid in pregnancy. The available data regarding the validity of ICG against an established reference standard using modern SV algorithms are both limited and conflicting. We aimed to test the validity of ICG in a clinically realistic setting in late pregnancy using echocardiography. METHODS: Twenty-nine women in late pregnancy underwent standard echocardiography assessments with simultaneous ICG measurement. Agreement between devices was tested using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis of the relationship between ICG and echocardiography demonstrated that the 95% limits of agreement exceeded acceptable or expected ranges. Measures of maternal and fetal anthropometry do not account for the lack of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute values of SV as determined by ICG are not valid in pregnancy. Further work is required to examine the ability of ICG to assess relative changes in maternal haemodynamics in late pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4389339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43893392015-04-09 Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy McIntyre, Jordan PR Ellyett, Kevin M Mitchell, Edwin A Quill, Gina M Thompson, John MD Stewart, Alistair W Doughty, Robert N Stone, Peter R BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of stroke volume (SV) is often necessary in clinical and research settings. The clinically established method for SV assessment in pregnancy is echocardiography, but given its limitations, it is not always an appropriate measurement tool. Thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG) allows continuous, non-invasive SV assessment. However, SV determination relies on assumptions regarding the thoracic shape that may mean the algorithm is not valid in pregnancy. The available data regarding the validity of ICG against an established reference standard using modern SV algorithms are both limited and conflicting. We aimed to test the validity of ICG in a clinically realistic setting in late pregnancy using echocardiography. METHODS: Twenty-nine women in late pregnancy underwent standard echocardiography assessments with simultaneous ICG measurement. Agreement between devices was tested using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis of the relationship between ICG and echocardiography demonstrated that the 95% limits of agreement exceeded acceptable or expected ranges. Measures of maternal and fetal anthropometry do not account for the lack of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute values of SV as determined by ICG are not valid in pregnancy. Further work is required to examine the ability of ICG to assess relative changes in maternal haemodynamics in late pregnancy. BioMed Central 2015-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4389339/ /pubmed/25886289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5 Text en © McIntyre et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McIntyre, Jordan PR Ellyett, Kevin M Mitchell, Edwin A Quill, Gina M Thompson, John MD Stewart, Alistair W Doughty, Robert N Stone, Peter R Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy |
title | Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy |
title_full | Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy |
title_fullStr | Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy |
title_short | Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy |
title_sort | validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcintyrejordanpr validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy AT ellyettkevinm validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy AT mitchelledwina validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy AT quillginam validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy AT thompsonjohnmd validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy AT stewartalistairw validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy AT doughtyrobertn validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy AT stonepeterr validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy AT validationofthoracicimpedancecardiographybyechocardiographyinhealthylatepregnancy |