Cargando…

Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response

INTRODUCTION: Triple-negative breast cancers need to be refined in order to identify therapeutic subgroups of patients. METHODS: We conducted an unsupervised analysis of microarray gene-expression profiles of 107 triple-negative breast cancer patients and undertook robust functional annotation of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jézéquel, Pascal, Loussouarn, Delphine, Guérin-Charbonnel, Catherine, Campion, Loïc, Vanier, Antoine, Gouraud, Wilfried, Lasla, Hamza, Guette, Catherine, Valo, Isabelle, Verrièle, Véronique, Campone, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0550-y
_version_ 1782365555147145216
author Jézéquel, Pascal
Loussouarn, Delphine
Guérin-Charbonnel, Catherine
Campion, Loïc
Vanier, Antoine
Gouraud, Wilfried
Lasla, Hamza
Guette, Catherine
Valo, Isabelle
Verrièle, Véronique
Campone, Mario
author_facet Jézéquel, Pascal
Loussouarn, Delphine
Guérin-Charbonnel, Catherine
Campion, Loïc
Vanier, Antoine
Gouraud, Wilfried
Lasla, Hamza
Guette, Catherine
Valo, Isabelle
Verrièle, Véronique
Campone, Mario
author_sort Jézéquel, Pascal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Triple-negative breast cancers need to be refined in order to identify therapeutic subgroups of patients. METHODS: We conducted an unsupervised analysis of microarray gene-expression profiles of 107 triple-negative breast cancer patients and undertook robust functional annotation of the molecular entities found by means of numerous approaches including immunohistochemistry and gene-expression signatures. A triple-negative external cohort (n = 87) was used for validation. RESULTS: Fuzzy clustering separated triple-negative tumours into three clusters: C1 (22.4%), C2 (44.9%) and C3 (32.7%). C1 patients were older (mean = 64.6 years) than C2 (mean = 56.8 years; P = 0.03) and C3 patients (mean = 51.9 years; P = 0.0004). Histological grade and Nottingham prognostic index were higher in C2 and C3 than in C1 (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Significant event-free survival (P = 0.03) was found according to cluster membership: patients belonging to C3 had a better outcome than patients in C1 (P = 0.01) and C2 (P = 0.02). Event-free survival analysis results were confirmed when our cohort was pooled with the external cohort (n = 194; P = 0.01). Functional annotation showed that 22% of triple-negative patients were not basal-like (C1). C1 was enriched in luminal subtypes and positive androgen receptor (luminal androgen receptor). C2 could be considered as an almost pure basal-like cluster. C3, enriched in basal-like subtypes but to a lesser extent, included 26% of claudin-low subtypes. Dissection of immune response showed that high immune response and low M2-like macrophages were a hallmark of C3, and that these patients had a better event-free survival than C2 patients, characterized by low immune response and high M2-like macrophages: P = 0.02 for our cohort, and P = 0.03 for pooled cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three subtypes of triple-negative patients: luminal androgen receptor (22%), basal-like with low immune response and high M2-like macrophages (45%), and basal-enriched with high immune response and low M2-like macrophages (33%). We noted out that macrophages and other immune effectors offer a variety of therapeutic targets in breast cancer, and particularly in triple-negative basal-like tumours. Furthermore, we showed that CK5 antibody was better suited than CK5/6 antibody to subtype triple-negative patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0550-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4389408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43894082015-04-09 Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response Jézéquel, Pascal Loussouarn, Delphine Guérin-Charbonnel, Catherine Campion, Loïc Vanier, Antoine Gouraud, Wilfried Lasla, Hamza Guette, Catherine Valo, Isabelle Verrièle, Véronique Campone, Mario Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Triple-negative breast cancers need to be refined in order to identify therapeutic subgroups of patients. METHODS: We conducted an unsupervised analysis of microarray gene-expression profiles of 107 triple-negative breast cancer patients and undertook robust functional annotation of the molecular entities found by means of numerous approaches including immunohistochemistry and gene-expression signatures. A triple-negative external cohort (n = 87) was used for validation. RESULTS: Fuzzy clustering separated triple-negative tumours into three clusters: C1 (22.4%), C2 (44.9%) and C3 (32.7%). C1 patients were older (mean = 64.6 years) than C2 (mean = 56.8 years; P = 0.03) and C3 patients (mean = 51.9 years; P = 0.0004). Histological grade and Nottingham prognostic index were higher in C2 and C3 than in C1 (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Significant event-free survival (P = 0.03) was found according to cluster membership: patients belonging to C3 had a better outcome than patients in C1 (P = 0.01) and C2 (P = 0.02). Event-free survival analysis results were confirmed when our cohort was pooled with the external cohort (n = 194; P = 0.01). Functional annotation showed that 22% of triple-negative patients were not basal-like (C1). C1 was enriched in luminal subtypes and positive androgen receptor (luminal androgen receptor). C2 could be considered as an almost pure basal-like cluster. C3, enriched in basal-like subtypes but to a lesser extent, included 26% of claudin-low subtypes. Dissection of immune response showed that high immune response and low M2-like macrophages were a hallmark of C3, and that these patients had a better event-free survival than C2 patients, characterized by low immune response and high M2-like macrophages: P = 0.02 for our cohort, and P = 0.03 for pooled cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three subtypes of triple-negative patients: luminal androgen receptor (22%), basal-like with low immune response and high M2-like macrophages (45%), and basal-enriched with high immune response and low M2-like macrophages (33%). We noted out that macrophages and other immune effectors offer a variety of therapeutic targets in breast cancer, and particularly in triple-negative basal-like tumours. Furthermore, we showed that CK5 antibody was better suited than CK5/6 antibody to subtype triple-negative patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0550-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-20 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4389408/ /pubmed/25887482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0550-y Text en © Jézéquel et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jézéquel, Pascal
Loussouarn, Delphine
Guérin-Charbonnel, Catherine
Campion, Loïc
Vanier, Antoine
Gouraud, Wilfried
Lasla, Hamza
Guette, Catherine
Valo, Isabelle
Verrièle, Véronique
Campone, Mario
Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response
title Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response
title_full Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response
title_fullStr Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response
title_full_unstemmed Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response
title_short Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response
title_sort gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0550-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jezequelpascal geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT loussouarndelphine geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT guerincharbonnelcatherine geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT campionloic geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT vanierantoine geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT gouraudwilfried geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT laslahamza geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT guettecatherine geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT valoisabelle geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT verrieleveronique geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse
AT camponemario geneexpressionmolecularsubtypingoftriplenegativebreastcancertumoursimportanceofimmuneresponse