Cargando…

Twenty years of vasoplegic syndrome treatment in heart surgery. Methylene blue revised

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to reassess the concepts established over the past 20 years, in particular in the last 5 years, about the use of methylene blue in the treatment of vasoplegic syndrome in cardiac surgery. METHODS: A wide literature review was carried out using the data extracted f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evora, Paulo Roberto Barbosa, Alves, Lafaiete, Ferreira, Cesar Augusto, Menardi, Antônio Carlos, Bassetto, Solange, Rodrigues, Alfredo José, Scorzoni, Adilson, Vicente, Walter Vilella de Andrade
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859872
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20140115
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to reassess the concepts established over the past 20 years, in particular in the last 5 years, about the use of methylene blue in the treatment of vasoplegic syndrome in cardiac surgery. METHODS: A wide literature review was carried out using the data extracted from: MEDLINE, SCOPUS and ISI WEB OF SCIENCE. RESULTS: The reassessed and reaffirmed concepts were 1) MB is safe in the recommended doses (the lethal dose is 40 mg/kg); 2) MB does not cause endothelial dysfunction; 3) The MB effect appears in cases of NO up-regulation; 4) MB is not a vasoconstrictor, by blocking the cGMP pathway it releases the cAMP pathway, facilitating the norepinephrine vasoconstrictor effect; 5) The most used dosage is 2 mg/kg as IV bolus, followed by the same continuous infusion because plasma concentrations sharply decrease in the first 40 minutes; and 6) There is a possible "window of opportunity" for MB's effectiveness. In the last five years, major challenges were: 1) Observations about side effects; 2) The need for prophylactic and therapeutic guidelines, and; 3) The need for the establishment of the MB therapeutic window in humans. CONCLUSION: MB action to treat vasoplegic syndrome is time-dependent. Therefore, the great challenge is the need, for the establishment the MB therapeutic window in humans. This would be the first step towards a systematic guideline to be followed by possible multicenter studies.