Cargando…

Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox(®)) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®))

Background. Whole blood viscoelastic tests such as the fibrin-based thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) test FIBTEM are increasingly used in the perioperative setting to quickly identify deficits in fibrin quality, and to guide hemostatic therapy. The recently developed FibScreen2 test of the ReoRox(®) me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solomon, Cristina, Schöchl, Herbert, Ranucci, Marco, Schött, Ulf, Schlimp, Christoph J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2014.993698
_version_ 1782365609588162560
author Solomon, Cristina
Schöchl, Herbert
Ranucci, Marco
Schött, Ulf
Schlimp, Christoph J.
author_facet Solomon, Cristina
Schöchl, Herbert
Ranucci, Marco
Schött, Ulf
Schlimp, Christoph J.
author_sort Solomon, Cristina
collection PubMed
description Background. Whole blood viscoelastic tests such as the fibrin-based thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) test FIBTEM are increasingly used in the perioperative setting to quickly identify deficits in fibrin quality, and to guide hemostatic therapy. The recently developed FibScreen2 test of the ReoRox(®) method, based on free oscillation rheometry, also provides an evaluation of fibrin clot quality. To date, little information is available on the performance of this test in hemodiluted blood, by comparison to FIBTEM. Methods. Whole blood samples from eight healthy volunteers were analyzed using FIBTEM and Fibscreen2. Native and diluted (to 33% and 50% using saline, gelatin or hydroxyethyl starch [HES]) samples were analyzed. Clot strength parameters, including FIBTEM maximum clot firmness (MCF), FIBTEM maximum clot elasticity (MCE) and Fibscreen2 maximum elasticity (G'max), were measured. Results. In repeatedly measured samples from two volunteers, FIBTEM MCF and Fibscreen2 G'max revealed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 5.3 vs. 16.3% and 5.6 vs. 31.7% for each volunteer, respectively. Hemodilution decreased clot strength. Both Fibscreen2 G'max and FIBTEM parameters decreased proportionally to the dilution ratio when saline was used. The observed reductions in FIBTEM and Fibscreen2 parameters were more severe in samples diluted with gelatin and HES, compared to saline. Finally, a regression analysis between FIBTEM MCE and Fibscreen2 G'max revealed a poor goodness of fit (r(2) = 0.37, p < 0.0001). Conclusions. ReoRox(®) Fibscreen2 test has a high coefficient of variation, and its application in various hemodilution conditions showed limited comparability with the ROTEM(®) FIBTEM test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4389733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43897332015-05-22 Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox(®)) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) Solomon, Cristina Schöchl, Herbert Ranucci, Marco Schött, Ulf Schlimp, Christoph J. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Original Article Background. Whole blood viscoelastic tests such as the fibrin-based thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) test FIBTEM are increasingly used in the perioperative setting to quickly identify deficits in fibrin quality, and to guide hemostatic therapy. The recently developed FibScreen2 test of the ReoRox(®) method, based on free oscillation rheometry, also provides an evaluation of fibrin clot quality. To date, little information is available on the performance of this test in hemodiluted blood, by comparison to FIBTEM. Methods. Whole blood samples from eight healthy volunteers were analyzed using FIBTEM and Fibscreen2. Native and diluted (to 33% and 50% using saline, gelatin or hydroxyethyl starch [HES]) samples were analyzed. Clot strength parameters, including FIBTEM maximum clot firmness (MCF), FIBTEM maximum clot elasticity (MCE) and Fibscreen2 maximum elasticity (G'max), were measured. Results. In repeatedly measured samples from two volunteers, FIBTEM MCF and Fibscreen2 G'max revealed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 5.3 vs. 16.3% and 5.6 vs. 31.7% for each volunteer, respectively. Hemodilution decreased clot strength. Both Fibscreen2 G'max and FIBTEM parameters decreased proportionally to the dilution ratio when saline was used. The observed reductions in FIBTEM and Fibscreen2 parameters were more severe in samples diluted with gelatin and HES, compared to saline. Finally, a regression analysis between FIBTEM MCE and Fibscreen2 G'max revealed a poor goodness of fit (r(2) = 0.37, p < 0.0001). Conclusions. ReoRox(®) Fibscreen2 test has a high coefficient of variation, and its application in various hemodilution conditions showed limited comparability with the ROTEM(®) FIBTEM test. Taylor & Francis 2015-05 2015-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4389733/ /pubmed/25598348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2014.993698 Text en © 2015 Informa Healthcare http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Solomon, Cristina
Schöchl, Herbert
Ranucci, Marco
Schött, Ulf
Schlimp, Christoph J.
Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox(®)) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®))
title Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox(®)) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®))
title_full Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox(®)) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®))
title_fullStr Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox(®)) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®))
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox(®)) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®))
title_short Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox(®)) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®))
title_sort comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (reorox(®)) versus thromboelastometry (rotem(®))
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2014.993698
work_keys_str_mv AT solomoncristina comparisonoffibrinbasedclotelasticityparametersmeasuredbyfreeoscillationrheometryreoroxversusthromboelastometryrotem
AT schochlherbert comparisonoffibrinbasedclotelasticityparametersmeasuredbyfreeoscillationrheometryreoroxversusthromboelastometryrotem
AT ranuccimarco comparisonoffibrinbasedclotelasticityparametersmeasuredbyfreeoscillationrheometryreoroxversusthromboelastometryrotem
AT schottulf comparisonoffibrinbasedclotelasticityparametersmeasuredbyfreeoscillationrheometryreoroxversusthromboelastometryrotem
AT schlimpchristophj comparisonoffibrinbasedclotelasticityparametersmeasuredbyfreeoscillationrheometryreoroxversusthromboelastometryrotem