Cargando…
Validity of calendar day-based definitions for community-onset bloodstream infections
BACKGROUND: Community-onset (CO) bloodstream infections (BSI) are those BSI where the blood culture is drawn <48 hours from hospital admission. However, exact times of culture draw or hospital admission are not always available. We evaluated the validity of using 2- or 3- calendar day based defin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1051-x |
_version_ | 1782365635680927744 |
---|---|
author | Laupland, Kevin B Gregson, Daniel B Church, Deirdre L |
author_facet | Laupland, Kevin B Gregson, Daniel B Church, Deirdre L |
author_sort | Laupland, Kevin B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Community-onset (CO) bloodstream infections (BSI) are those BSI where the blood culture is drawn <48 hours from hospital admission. However, exact times of culture draw or hospital admission are not always available. We evaluated the validity of using 2- or 3- calendar day based definitions for CO-BSI by comparing to a “gold standard” 48-hour definition. FINDINGS: Among the population-based cohort of 14,106 episodes of BSI studied, 10,543 were classified as CO based on “gold standard” 48-hour criteria. When 2-day and 3-day definitions were applied, 10,396 and 10,707 CO-BSI episodes were ascertained, respectively. All but 147 (1.4%) true CO-BSI cases were included by using the 2-day definition. When the 3-day definition was applied, all cases of CO-BSI were identified but and additional 164 (1.5%) cases of hospital-onset HO-BSI were also included. Thus the sensitivity and specificity of the 2-day definition was 98.6% and 100% and for the 3-day definition was 100% and 98.5%, respectively. Overall, only 311 (2.2%) cases were potentially miss-classifiable using either the 2- or 3-calendar day based definitions. CONCLUSIONS: Use of either a 2- or 3-day definition is highly accurate for classifying CO-BSI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4389998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43899982015-04-09 Validity of calendar day-based definitions for community-onset bloodstream infections Laupland, Kevin B Gregson, Daniel B Church, Deirdre L BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Community-onset (CO) bloodstream infections (BSI) are those BSI where the blood culture is drawn <48 hours from hospital admission. However, exact times of culture draw or hospital admission are not always available. We evaluated the validity of using 2- or 3- calendar day based definitions for CO-BSI by comparing to a “gold standard” 48-hour definition. FINDINGS: Among the population-based cohort of 14,106 episodes of BSI studied, 10,543 were classified as CO based on “gold standard” 48-hour criteria. When 2-day and 3-day definitions were applied, 10,396 and 10,707 CO-BSI episodes were ascertained, respectively. All but 147 (1.4%) true CO-BSI cases were included by using the 2-day definition. When the 3-day definition was applied, all cases of CO-BSI were identified but and additional 164 (1.5%) cases of hospital-onset HO-BSI were also included. Thus the sensitivity and specificity of the 2-day definition was 98.6% and 100% and for the 3-day definition was 100% and 98.5%, respectively. Overall, only 311 (2.2%) cases were potentially miss-classifiable using either the 2- or 3-calendar day based definitions. CONCLUSIONS: Use of either a 2- or 3-day definition is highly accurate for classifying CO-BSI. BioMed Central 2015-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4389998/ /pubmed/25889421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1051-x Text en © Laupland et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Laupland, Kevin B Gregson, Daniel B Church, Deirdre L Validity of calendar day-based definitions for community-onset bloodstream infections |
title | Validity of calendar day-based definitions for community-onset bloodstream infections |
title_full | Validity of calendar day-based definitions for community-onset bloodstream infections |
title_fullStr | Validity of calendar day-based definitions for community-onset bloodstream infections |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of calendar day-based definitions for community-onset bloodstream infections |
title_short | Validity of calendar day-based definitions for community-onset bloodstream infections |
title_sort | validity of calendar day-based definitions for community-onset bloodstream infections |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1051-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lauplandkevinb validityofcalendardaybaseddefinitionsforcommunityonsetbloodstreaminfections AT gregsondanielb validityofcalendardaybaseddefinitionsforcommunityonsetbloodstreaminfections AT churchdeirdrel validityofcalendardaybaseddefinitionsforcommunityonsetbloodstreaminfections |