Cargando…
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saroglitazar 2 and 4 mg Compared to Pioglitazone 45 mg in Diabetic Dyslipidemia (PRESS V)
Dual PPARα/γ can improve both metabolic effects and minimized the side effects caused by either PPARα or PPARγ agonist. The PRESS V study was aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of saroglitazar 2 mg and 4 mg capsules (Lipaglyn™; Zydus Code: ZYH1) as compared to high dose pioglit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4390522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24876549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932296813518680 |
_version_ | 1782365694450466816 |
---|---|
author | Pai, Vikas Paneerselvam, A Mukhopadhyay, Satinath Bhansali, Anil Kamath, Dinesh Shankar, V Gambhire, Dhiraj Jani, Rajendrakumar H. Joshi, Shashank Patel, Pankaj |
author_facet | Pai, Vikas Paneerselvam, A Mukhopadhyay, Satinath Bhansali, Anil Kamath, Dinesh Shankar, V Gambhire, Dhiraj Jani, Rajendrakumar H. Joshi, Shashank Patel, Pankaj |
author_sort | Pai, Vikas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dual PPARα/γ can improve both metabolic effects and minimized the side effects caused by either PPARα or PPARγ agonist. The PRESS V study was aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of saroglitazar 2 mg and 4 mg capsules (Lipaglyn™; Zydus Code: ZYH1) as compared to high dose pioglitazone in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia. In this 26-week double-blind, parallel arm, phase 3 study patients with hypertriglyceridemia with type 2 diabetes mellitus (BMI > 23 kg/m(2); hypertriglyceridemia: TG > 200 to 400 mg/dL; glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] >7 to 9%) were enrolled from 14 sites in India. After 2 weeks of lifestyle modification, 122 patients were randomized double-blind to 24-week treatment with the study drugs (saroglitazar 2 mg or 4 mg or pioglitazone 45 mg once daily) in a 1:1:1 ratio. The primary end point was change in plasma triglyceride level at week 24. The secondary end points were change in lipid profile and fasting plasma glucose at week 24. Patients who received study medication and had undergone at least 1 postbaseline efficacy evaluation were included in the efficacy analysis. All randomized patients who received at least a single dose were included for safety evaluation. The efficacy analysis included 109 patients (n = 37 in saroglitazar 2 mg; n = 39 in saroglitazar 4 mg; n = 33 in pioglitazone). Saroglitazar 2 mg and 4 mg significantly reduced (P < .001) plasma triglyceride from baseline by 26.4% (absolute change ± SD: −78.2 ± 81.98 mg/dL) and 45% (absolute change ± SD −115.4 ± 68.11 mg/dL), respectively, as compared to pioglitazone -15.5% (absolute change ± SD: −33.3 ± 162.41 mg/dL) at week 24. Saroglitazar 4 mg treatment also demonstrated marked decrease in low-density lipoprotein (5%), very-low-density lipoprotein (45.5%), total cholesterol (7.7%), and apolipoprotein-B (10.9%). Saroglitazar treatment was generally safe and well tolerated. No serious adverse events were reported in saroglitazar treatment arm and no persistent change in laboratory parameters. Saroglitazar appeared to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for improving hypertriglyceridemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4390522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43905222015-04-10 A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saroglitazar 2 and 4 mg Compared to Pioglitazone 45 mg in Diabetic Dyslipidemia (PRESS V) Pai, Vikas Paneerselvam, A Mukhopadhyay, Satinath Bhansali, Anil Kamath, Dinesh Shankar, V Gambhire, Dhiraj Jani, Rajendrakumar H. Joshi, Shashank Patel, Pankaj J Diabetes Sci Technol Original Articles Dual PPARα/γ can improve both metabolic effects and minimized the side effects caused by either PPARα or PPARγ agonist. The PRESS V study was aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of saroglitazar 2 mg and 4 mg capsules (Lipaglyn™; Zydus Code: ZYH1) as compared to high dose pioglitazone in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia. In this 26-week double-blind, parallel arm, phase 3 study patients with hypertriglyceridemia with type 2 diabetes mellitus (BMI > 23 kg/m(2); hypertriglyceridemia: TG > 200 to 400 mg/dL; glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] >7 to 9%) were enrolled from 14 sites in India. After 2 weeks of lifestyle modification, 122 patients were randomized double-blind to 24-week treatment with the study drugs (saroglitazar 2 mg or 4 mg or pioglitazone 45 mg once daily) in a 1:1:1 ratio. The primary end point was change in plasma triglyceride level at week 24. The secondary end points were change in lipid profile and fasting plasma glucose at week 24. Patients who received study medication and had undergone at least 1 postbaseline efficacy evaluation were included in the efficacy analysis. All randomized patients who received at least a single dose were included for safety evaluation. The efficacy analysis included 109 patients (n = 37 in saroglitazar 2 mg; n = 39 in saroglitazar 4 mg; n = 33 in pioglitazone). Saroglitazar 2 mg and 4 mg significantly reduced (P < .001) plasma triglyceride from baseline by 26.4% (absolute change ± SD: −78.2 ± 81.98 mg/dL) and 45% (absolute change ± SD −115.4 ± 68.11 mg/dL), respectively, as compared to pioglitazone -15.5% (absolute change ± SD: −33.3 ± 162.41 mg/dL) at week 24. Saroglitazar 4 mg treatment also demonstrated marked decrease in low-density lipoprotein (5%), very-low-density lipoprotein (45.5%), total cholesterol (7.7%), and apolipoprotein-B (10.9%). Saroglitazar treatment was generally safe and well tolerated. No serious adverse events were reported in saroglitazar treatment arm and no persistent change in laboratory parameters. Saroglitazar appeared to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for improving hypertriglyceridemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. SAGE Publications 2014-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4390522/ /pubmed/24876549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932296813518680 Text en © 2014 Diabetes Technology Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Pai, Vikas Paneerselvam, A Mukhopadhyay, Satinath Bhansali, Anil Kamath, Dinesh Shankar, V Gambhire, Dhiraj Jani, Rajendrakumar H. Joshi, Shashank Patel, Pankaj A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saroglitazar 2 and 4 mg Compared to Pioglitazone 45 mg in Diabetic Dyslipidemia (PRESS V) |
title | A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saroglitazar 2 and 4 mg Compared to Pioglitazone 45 mg in Diabetic Dyslipidemia (PRESS V) |
title_full | A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saroglitazar 2 and 4 mg Compared to Pioglitazone 45 mg in Diabetic Dyslipidemia (PRESS V) |
title_fullStr | A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saroglitazar 2 and 4 mg Compared to Pioglitazone 45 mg in Diabetic Dyslipidemia (PRESS V) |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saroglitazar 2 and 4 mg Compared to Pioglitazone 45 mg in Diabetic Dyslipidemia (PRESS V) |
title_short | A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saroglitazar 2 and 4 mg Compared to Pioglitazone 45 mg in Diabetic Dyslipidemia (PRESS V) |
title_sort | multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar 2 and 4 mg compared to pioglitazone 45 mg in diabetic dyslipidemia (press v) |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4390522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24876549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932296813518680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paivikas amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT paneerselvama amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT mukhopadhyaysatinath amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT bhansalianil amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT kamathdinesh amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT shankarv amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT gambhiredhiraj amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT janirajendrakumarh amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT joshishashank amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT patelpankaj amulticenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT paivikas multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT paneerselvama multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT mukhopadhyaysatinath multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT bhansalianil multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT kamathdinesh multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT shankarv multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT gambhiredhiraj multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT janirajendrakumarh multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT joshishashank multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv AT patelpankaj multicenterprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofsaroglitazar2and4mgcomparedtopioglitazone45mgindiabeticdyslipidemiapressv |