Cargando…
Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model
Genomic selection (GS) models use genome-wide genetic information to predict genetic values of candidates of selection. Originally, these models were developed without considering genotype × environment interaction(G×E). Several authors have proposed extensions of the single-environment GS model tha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Genetics Society of America
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4390573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25660166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.016097 |
_version_ | 1782365700256432128 |
---|---|
author | Lopez-Cruz, Marco Crossa, Jose Bonnett, David Dreisigacker, Susanne Poland, Jesse Jannink, Jean-Luc Singh, Ravi P. Autrique, Enrique de los Campos, Gustavo |
author_facet | Lopez-Cruz, Marco Crossa, Jose Bonnett, David Dreisigacker, Susanne Poland, Jesse Jannink, Jean-Luc Singh, Ravi P. Autrique, Enrique de los Campos, Gustavo |
author_sort | Lopez-Cruz, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic selection (GS) models use genome-wide genetic information to predict genetic values of candidates of selection. Originally, these models were developed without considering genotype × environment interaction(G×E). Several authors have proposed extensions of the single-environment GS model that accommodate G×E using either covariance functions or environmental covariates. In this study, we model G×E using a marker × environment interaction (M×E) GS model; the approach is conceptually simple and can be implemented with existing GS software. We discuss how the model can be implemented by using an explicit regression of phenotypes on markers or using co-variance structures (a genomic best linear unbiased prediction-type model). We used the M×E model to analyze three CIMMYT wheat data sets (W1, W2, and W3), where more than 1000 lines were genotyped using genotyping-by-sequencing and evaluated at CIMMYT’s research station in Ciudad Obregon, Mexico, under simulated environmental conditions that covered different irrigation levels, sowing dates and planting systems. We compared the M×E model with a stratified (i.e., within-environment) analysis and with a standard (across-environment) GS model that assumes that effects are constant across environments (i.e., ignoring G×E). The prediction accuracy of the M×E model was substantially greater of that of an across-environment analysis that ignores G×E. Depending on the prediction problem, the M×E model had either similar or greater levels of prediction accuracy than the stratified analyses. The M×E model decomposes marker effects and genomic values into components that are stable across environments (main effects) and others that are environment-specific (interactions). Therefore, in principle, the interaction model could shed light over which variants have effects that are stable across environments and which ones are responsible for G×E. The data set and the scripts required to reproduce the analysis are publicly available as Supporting Information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4390573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Genetics Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43905732015-04-10 Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model Lopez-Cruz, Marco Crossa, Jose Bonnett, David Dreisigacker, Susanne Poland, Jesse Jannink, Jean-Luc Singh, Ravi P. Autrique, Enrique de los Campos, Gustavo G3 (Bethesda) Genomic Selection Genomic selection (GS) models use genome-wide genetic information to predict genetic values of candidates of selection. Originally, these models were developed without considering genotype × environment interaction(G×E). Several authors have proposed extensions of the single-environment GS model that accommodate G×E using either covariance functions or environmental covariates. In this study, we model G×E using a marker × environment interaction (M×E) GS model; the approach is conceptually simple and can be implemented with existing GS software. We discuss how the model can be implemented by using an explicit regression of phenotypes on markers or using co-variance structures (a genomic best linear unbiased prediction-type model). We used the M×E model to analyze three CIMMYT wheat data sets (W1, W2, and W3), where more than 1000 lines were genotyped using genotyping-by-sequencing and evaluated at CIMMYT’s research station in Ciudad Obregon, Mexico, under simulated environmental conditions that covered different irrigation levels, sowing dates and planting systems. We compared the M×E model with a stratified (i.e., within-environment) analysis and with a standard (across-environment) GS model that assumes that effects are constant across environments (i.e., ignoring G×E). The prediction accuracy of the M×E model was substantially greater of that of an across-environment analysis that ignores G×E. Depending on the prediction problem, the M×E model had either similar or greater levels of prediction accuracy than the stratified analyses. The M×E model decomposes marker effects and genomic values into components that are stable across environments (main effects) and others that are environment-specific (interactions). Therefore, in principle, the interaction model could shed light over which variants have effects that are stable across environments and which ones are responsible for G×E. The data set and the scripts required to reproduce the analysis are publicly available as Supporting Information. Genetics Society of America 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4390573/ /pubmed/25660166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.016097 Text en Copyright © 2015 Lopez-Cruz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Unported License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Genomic Selection Lopez-Cruz, Marco Crossa, Jose Bonnett, David Dreisigacker, Susanne Poland, Jesse Jannink, Jean-Luc Singh, Ravi P. Autrique, Enrique de los Campos, Gustavo Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model |
title | Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model |
title_full | Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model |
title_fullStr | Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model |
title_short | Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model |
title_sort | increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker × environment interaction genomic selection model |
topic | Genomic Selection |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4390573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25660166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.016097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezcruzmarco increasedpredictionaccuracyinwheatbreedingtrialsusingamarkerenvironmentinteractiongenomicselectionmodel AT crossajose increasedpredictionaccuracyinwheatbreedingtrialsusingamarkerenvironmentinteractiongenomicselectionmodel AT bonnettdavid increasedpredictionaccuracyinwheatbreedingtrialsusingamarkerenvironmentinteractiongenomicselectionmodel AT dreisigackersusanne increasedpredictionaccuracyinwheatbreedingtrialsusingamarkerenvironmentinteractiongenomicselectionmodel AT polandjesse increasedpredictionaccuracyinwheatbreedingtrialsusingamarkerenvironmentinteractiongenomicselectionmodel AT janninkjeanluc increasedpredictionaccuracyinwheatbreedingtrialsusingamarkerenvironmentinteractiongenomicselectionmodel AT singhravip increasedpredictionaccuracyinwheatbreedingtrialsusingamarkerenvironmentinteractiongenomicselectionmodel AT autriqueenrique increasedpredictionaccuracyinwheatbreedingtrialsusingamarkerenvironmentinteractiongenomicselectionmodel AT deloscamposgustavo increasedpredictionaccuracyinwheatbreedingtrialsusingamarkerenvironmentinteractiongenomicselectionmodel |