Cargando…

The Huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients

BACKGROUND: Management of gap nonunion of tibia is technically difficult, time consuming, physically and psychologically demanding for the patient with unpredictable results. Various techniques have been described in literature for the treatment of gap nonunions, but each one has its own limitations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Som P., Garg, Gaurav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0618-8
_version_ 1782365757767680000
author Gupta, Som P.
Garg, Gaurav
author_facet Gupta, Som P.
Garg, Gaurav
author_sort Gupta, Som P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Management of gap nonunion of tibia is technically difficult, time consuming, physically and psychologically demanding for the patient with unpredictable results. Various techniques have been described in literature for the treatment of gap nonunions, but each one has its own limitations. PURPOSE: This study reports the outcomes of ipsilateral fibular transposition for reconstruction of tibial defects in paediatric age group. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 14 patients who underwent surgery for gap nonunion tibia with ipsilateral tibialization of fibula. Fibula is transferred to tibia as pedicle graft in two-staged procedure. Due to retained blood supply to one end of the transplant, the graft easily takes up and hypertrophies upon weight bearing over a period of time. RESULTS: Average time of radiographic union was 13.35 weeks. Guarded partial weight bearing was started at an average of 16.5 weeks with gradual progression to full weight bearing. The leg length discrepancy at final follow-up ranged from 0 to 7 cms with an average of 2.60 cms. Hypertrophy of tibialized fibula was observed in all patients, with 8 patients showed grafted fibula reaching the diameter of opposite tibia. On subjective assessment, 9 patients were highly satisfied, 4 patients were satisfied and one patient was dissatisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Huntington procedure is a simple, cost-effective and easy procedure for large tibial defects in paediatric patients which does not require any specialized team and implants, and can be performed in moderately equipped hospital. Leg length discrepancy may be addressed, after the transferred fibula is well developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4391050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43910502015-04-09 The Huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients Gupta, Som P. Garg, Gaurav J Child Orthop Original Clinical Article BACKGROUND: Management of gap nonunion of tibia is technically difficult, time consuming, physically and psychologically demanding for the patient with unpredictable results. Various techniques have been described in literature for the treatment of gap nonunions, but each one has its own limitations. PURPOSE: This study reports the outcomes of ipsilateral fibular transposition for reconstruction of tibial defects in paediatric age group. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 14 patients who underwent surgery for gap nonunion tibia with ipsilateral tibialization of fibula. Fibula is transferred to tibia as pedicle graft in two-staged procedure. Due to retained blood supply to one end of the transplant, the graft easily takes up and hypertrophies upon weight bearing over a period of time. RESULTS: Average time of radiographic union was 13.35 weeks. Guarded partial weight bearing was started at an average of 16.5 weeks with gradual progression to full weight bearing. The leg length discrepancy at final follow-up ranged from 0 to 7 cms with an average of 2.60 cms. Hypertrophy of tibialized fibula was observed in all patients, with 8 patients showed grafted fibula reaching the diameter of opposite tibia. On subjective assessment, 9 patients were highly satisfied, 4 patients were satisfied and one patient was dissatisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Huntington procedure is a simple, cost-effective and easy procedure for large tibial defects in paediatric patients which does not require any specialized team and implants, and can be performed in moderately equipped hospital. Leg length discrepancy may be addressed, after the transferred fibula is well developed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-10-29 2014-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4391050/ /pubmed/25352371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0618-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Article
Gupta, Som P.
Garg, Gaurav
The Huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients
title The Huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients
title_full The Huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients
title_fullStr The Huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients
title_full_unstemmed The Huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients
title_short The Huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients
title_sort huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients
topic Original Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0618-8
work_keys_str_mv AT guptasomp thehuntingtonprocedurestillareasonableoptionforlargetibialdefectsinpaediatricpatients
AT garggaurav thehuntingtonprocedurestillareasonableoptionforlargetibialdefectsinpaediatricpatients
AT guptasomp huntingtonprocedurestillareasonableoptionforlargetibialdefectsinpaediatricpatients
AT garggaurav huntingtonprocedurestillareasonableoptionforlargetibialdefectsinpaediatricpatients