Cargando…
Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model
The aim of this study has been to elucidate the effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 on epithelial integrity in intestinal epithelial cells and whether pre- and coincubation with this strain can reproducibly prevent damage induced by enterotoxigenic (ETEC) and enteropathogenic Es...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25883829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/235184 |
_version_ | 1782365775024095232 |
---|---|
author | Lodemann, Ulrike Strahlendorf, Julia Schierack, Peter Klingspor, Shanti Aschenbach, Jörg R. Martens, Holger |
author_facet | Lodemann, Ulrike Strahlendorf, Julia Schierack, Peter Klingspor, Shanti Aschenbach, Jörg R. Martens, Holger |
author_sort | Lodemann, Ulrike |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study has been to elucidate the effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 on epithelial integrity in intestinal epithelial cells and whether pre- and coincubation with this strain can reproducibly prevent damage induced by enterotoxigenic (ETEC) and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC). Porcine (IPEC-J2) and human (Caco-2) intestinal epithelial cells were incubated with bacterial strains and epithelial integrity was assessed by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and mannitol flux rates. E. faecium alone increased TEER of Caco-2 cells without affecting mannitol fluxes whereas the E. coli strains decreased TEER and concomitantly increased mannitol flux rates in both cell lines. Preincubation with E. faecium had no effect on the TEER decrease induced by E. coli in preliminary experiments. However, in a second set of experiments using a slightly different protocol, E. faecium ameliorated the TEER decrease induced by ETEC at 4 h in IPEC-J2 and at 2, 4, and 6 h in Caco-2 cells. We conclude that E. faecium positively affected epithelial integrity in monoinfected Caco-2 cells and could ameliorate the damage on TEER induced by an ETEC strain. Reproducibility of the results is, however, limited when experiments are performed with living bacteria over longer periods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4391159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43911592015-04-16 Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model Lodemann, Ulrike Strahlendorf, Julia Schierack, Peter Klingspor, Shanti Aschenbach, Jörg R. Martens, Holger Scientifica (Cairo) Research Article The aim of this study has been to elucidate the effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 on epithelial integrity in intestinal epithelial cells and whether pre- and coincubation with this strain can reproducibly prevent damage induced by enterotoxigenic (ETEC) and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC). Porcine (IPEC-J2) and human (Caco-2) intestinal epithelial cells were incubated with bacterial strains and epithelial integrity was assessed by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and mannitol flux rates. E. faecium alone increased TEER of Caco-2 cells without affecting mannitol fluxes whereas the E. coli strains decreased TEER and concomitantly increased mannitol flux rates in both cell lines. Preincubation with E. faecium had no effect on the TEER decrease induced by E. coli in preliminary experiments. However, in a second set of experiments using a slightly different protocol, E. faecium ameliorated the TEER decrease induced by ETEC at 4 h in IPEC-J2 and at 2, 4, and 6 h in Caco-2 cells. We conclude that E. faecium positively affected epithelial integrity in monoinfected Caco-2 cells and could ameliorate the damage on TEER induced by an ETEC strain. Reproducibility of the results is, however, limited when experiments are performed with living bacteria over longer periods. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4391159/ /pubmed/25883829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/235184 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ulrike Lodemann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lodemann, Ulrike Strahlendorf, Julia Schierack, Peter Klingspor, Shanti Aschenbach, Jörg R. Martens, Holger Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model |
title | Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model |
title_full | Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model |
title_fullStr | Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model |
title_short | Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model |
title_sort | effects of the probiotic enterococcus faecium and pathogenic escherichia coli strains in a pig and human epithelial intestinal cell model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25883829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/235184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lodemannulrike effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel AT strahlendorfjulia effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel AT schierackpeter effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel AT klingsporshanti effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel AT aschenbachjorgr effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel AT martensholger effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel |