Cargando…

Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model

The aim of this study has been to elucidate the effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 on epithelial integrity in intestinal epithelial cells and whether pre- and coincubation with this strain can reproducibly prevent damage induced by enterotoxigenic (ETEC) and enteropathogenic Es...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lodemann, Ulrike, Strahlendorf, Julia, Schierack, Peter, Klingspor, Shanti, Aschenbach, Jörg R., Martens, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25883829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/235184
_version_ 1782365775024095232
author Lodemann, Ulrike
Strahlendorf, Julia
Schierack, Peter
Klingspor, Shanti
Aschenbach, Jörg R.
Martens, Holger
author_facet Lodemann, Ulrike
Strahlendorf, Julia
Schierack, Peter
Klingspor, Shanti
Aschenbach, Jörg R.
Martens, Holger
author_sort Lodemann, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study has been to elucidate the effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 on epithelial integrity in intestinal epithelial cells and whether pre- and coincubation with this strain can reproducibly prevent damage induced by enterotoxigenic (ETEC) and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC). Porcine (IPEC-J2) and human (Caco-2) intestinal epithelial cells were incubated with bacterial strains and epithelial integrity was assessed by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and mannitol flux rates. E. faecium alone increased TEER of Caco-2 cells without affecting mannitol fluxes whereas the E. coli strains decreased TEER and concomitantly increased mannitol flux rates in both cell lines. Preincubation with E. faecium had no effect on the TEER decrease induced by E. coli in preliminary experiments. However, in a second set of experiments using a slightly different protocol, E. faecium ameliorated the TEER decrease induced by ETEC at 4 h in IPEC-J2 and at 2, 4, and 6 h in Caco-2 cells. We conclude that E. faecium positively affected epithelial integrity in monoinfected Caco-2 cells and could ameliorate the damage on TEER induced by an ETEC strain. Reproducibility of the results is, however, limited when experiments are performed with living bacteria over longer periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4391159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43911592015-04-16 Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model Lodemann, Ulrike Strahlendorf, Julia Schierack, Peter Klingspor, Shanti Aschenbach, Jörg R. Martens, Holger Scientifica (Cairo) Research Article The aim of this study has been to elucidate the effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 on epithelial integrity in intestinal epithelial cells and whether pre- and coincubation with this strain can reproducibly prevent damage induced by enterotoxigenic (ETEC) and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC). Porcine (IPEC-J2) and human (Caco-2) intestinal epithelial cells were incubated with bacterial strains and epithelial integrity was assessed by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and mannitol flux rates. E. faecium alone increased TEER of Caco-2 cells without affecting mannitol fluxes whereas the E. coli strains decreased TEER and concomitantly increased mannitol flux rates in both cell lines. Preincubation with E. faecium had no effect on the TEER decrease induced by E. coli in preliminary experiments. However, in a second set of experiments using a slightly different protocol, E. faecium ameliorated the TEER decrease induced by ETEC at 4 h in IPEC-J2 and at 2, 4, and 6 h in Caco-2 cells. We conclude that E. faecium positively affected epithelial integrity in monoinfected Caco-2 cells and could ameliorate the damage on TEER induced by an ETEC strain. Reproducibility of the results is, however, limited when experiments are performed with living bacteria over longer periods. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4391159/ /pubmed/25883829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/235184 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ulrike Lodemann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lodemann, Ulrike
Strahlendorf, Julia
Schierack, Peter
Klingspor, Shanti
Aschenbach, Jörg R.
Martens, Holger
Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model
title Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model
title_full Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model
title_fullStr Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model
title_full_unstemmed Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model
title_short Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model
title_sort effects of the probiotic enterococcus faecium and pathogenic escherichia coli strains in a pig and human epithelial intestinal cell model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25883829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/235184
work_keys_str_mv AT lodemannulrike effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel
AT strahlendorfjulia effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel
AT schierackpeter effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel
AT klingsporshanti effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel
AT aschenbachjorgr effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel
AT martensholger effectsoftheprobioticenterococcusfaeciumandpathogenicescherichiacolistrainsinapigandhumanepithelialintestinalcellmodel