Cargando…

CMR-derived TAPSE measurement: a semi-quantitative method of right ventricular function assessment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

AIM: To compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived right ventricular fractional shortening (RVFS), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion with a reference point within the right ventricular apex (TAPSE(in)) and with one outside the ventricle (TAPSE(out)) with the standard volumetric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doesch, C., Zompolou, C., Streitner, F., Haghi, D., Schimpf, R., Rudic, B., Kuschyk, J., Schoenberg, S. O., Borggrefe, M., Papavassiliu, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25294643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0601-5
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived right ventricular fractional shortening (RVFS), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion with a reference point within the right ventricular apex (TAPSE(in)) and with one outside the ventricle (TAPSE(out)) with the standard volumetric approach in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: 105 patients with HCM and 20 healthy subjects underwent CMR. In patients with HCM, TAPSE(in) (r = 0.31, p = 0.001) and RVFS (r = 0.35, p = 0.0002) revealed a significant but weak correlation with right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), whereas TAPSE(out) (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001) showed a moderate correlation with RVEF. The ability to predict RVEF < 45 % in HCM patients was best for TAPSE(out). In patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), RVEF showed a significant but weak correlation with TAPSE(out) (r = 0.36, p = 0.02) and no correlation with TAPSE(in) (r = 0.05, p = 0.07) and RVFS (r = 0.02, p = 0.2). In patients with hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM), there was a moderate correlation between RVEF and TAPSE(out) (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001) and a weak correlation with TAPSE(in) (r = 0.39, p = 0.001) and RVFS (r = 0.38, p = 0.002). In the 20 healthy controls, there was a strong correlation between RVEF and all semi-quantitative measurements. CONCLUSION: CMR-derived TAPSE(in) is not suitable to determine right ventricular function in HCM patients. TAPSE(out) showed a good correlation with RVEF in HNCM patients but only a weak correlation in HOCM patients. TAPSE(out) might be used for screening but the detection of subtle changes in RV function requires the 3D volumetric approach.