Cargando…

Radiation risks knowledge in resident and fellow in paediatrics: a questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND: Analyse through a multi-choice anonymous questionnaire the knowledge’s level in paediatric residents and fellows in two different main Italian hospital, looking mainly to the information to patients and relatives related to risks of ionizing radiation used in common radiological investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salerno, Sergio, Marchese, Paola, Magistrelli, Andrea, Tomà, Paolo, Matranga, Domenica, Midiri, Massimo, Ugazio, Alberto G, Corsello, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25881170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-015-0130-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Analyse through a multi-choice anonymous questionnaire the knowledge’s level in paediatric residents and fellows in two different main Italian hospital, looking mainly to the information to patients and relatives related to risks of ionizing radiation used in common radiological investigations in children. METHODS: 65 multi choice questionnaires were distributed to paediatric residents and fellows of two different hospitals, an University Hospital (A.O.U.P. “P. Giaccone”- University of Palermo) and a national reference centre for paediatrics (Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù - Rome). The questionnaire included twelve multiple-choice questions with the aim of analyzing the knowledge about ionizing radiation related risks in infants and children who undergo common diagnostic radiology investigations. The data obtained were processed using software Stata/MP version 11.2. In order to measure the level of expertise of each interviewee a binary indicator was built. The value 1 was assigned if the percentage of correct answers exceeds the median of the distribution and 0 for values not exceeding the median. The association between the level of competence and demographic characteristics (gender, age) and training experience was measured by means of α(2) test. RESULTS: 51/65 questionnaires were completed, returned and analysed (87.7%). Only 18 surveyed (35%), (95% IC = [22%-48%]) can be defined as competent in radiation risk knowledge for common radiological investigations, considering the percentage of correct answers at least of 50% (sufficient knowledge was given with a minimum score of 8 correct answers out of 12). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates an urgent need to implement the radiation protection knowledge in the training programme of paediatricians, that improve if just a short targeted training is performed.