Cargando…
Development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk
BACKGROUND: Germline DNA mutations that increase the susceptibility of a patient to certain cancers have been identified in various genes, and patients can be screened for mutations in these genes to assess their level of risk for developing cancer. Traditional methods using Sanger sequencing focus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1224-y |
_version_ | 1782365859967139840 |
---|---|
author | Judkins, Thaddeus Leclair, Benoît Bowles, Karla Gutin, Natalia Trost, Jeff McCulloch, James Bhatnagar, Satish Murray, Adam Craft, Jonathan Wardell, Bryan Bastian, Mark Mitchell, Jeffrey Chen, Jian Tran, Thanh Williams, Deborah Potter, Jennifer Jammulapati, Srikanth Perry, Michael Morris, Brian Roa, Benjamin Timms, Kirsten |
author_facet | Judkins, Thaddeus Leclair, Benoît Bowles, Karla Gutin, Natalia Trost, Jeff McCulloch, James Bhatnagar, Satish Murray, Adam Craft, Jonathan Wardell, Bryan Bastian, Mark Mitchell, Jeffrey Chen, Jian Tran, Thanh Williams, Deborah Potter, Jennifer Jammulapati, Srikanth Perry, Michael Morris, Brian Roa, Benjamin Timms, Kirsten |
author_sort | Judkins, Thaddeus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Germline DNA mutations that increase the susceptibility of a patient to certain cancers have been identified in various genes, and patients can be screened for mutations in these genes to assess their level of risk for developing cancer. Traditional methods using Sanger sequencing focus on small groups of genes and therefore are unable to screen for numerous genes from several patients simultaneously. The goal of the present study was to validate a 25-gene panel to assess genetic risk for cancer in 8 different tissues using next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques. METHODS: Twenty-five genes associated with hereditary cancer syndromes were selected for development of a panel to screen for risk of these cancers using NGS. In an initial technical assessment, NGS results for BRCA1 and BRCA2 were compared with Sanger sequencing in 1864 anonymized DNA samples from patients who had undergone previous clinical testing. Next, the entire gene panel was validated using parallel NGS and Sanger sequencing in 100 anonymized DNA samples. Large rearrangement analysis was validated using NGS, microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analyses (MLPA). RESULTS: NGS identified 15,877 sequence variants, while Sanger sequencing identified 15,878 in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 comparison study of the same regions. Based on these results, the NGS process was refined prior to the validation of the full gene panel. In the validation study, NGS and Sanger sequencing were 100% concordant for the 3,923 collective variants across all genes for an analytical sensitivity of the NGS assay of >99.92% (lower limit of 95% confidence interval). NGS, microarray CGH and MLPA correctly identified all expected positive and negative large rearrangement results for the 25-gene panel. CONCLUSION: This study provides a thorough validation of the 25-gene NGS panel and indicates that this analysis tool can be used to collect clinically significant information related to risk of developing hereditary cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4391687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43916872015-04-10 Development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk Judkins, Thaddeus Leclair, Benoît Bowles, Karla Gutin, Natalia Trost, Jeff McCulloch, James Bhatnagar, Satish Murray, Adam Craft, Jonathan Wardell, Bryan Bastian, Mark Mitchell, Jeffrey Chen, Jian Tran, Thanh Williams, Deborah Potter, Jennifer Jammulapati, Srikanth Perry, Michael Morris, Brian Roa, Benjamin Timms, Kirsten BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Germline DNA mutations that increase the susceptibility of a patient to certain cancers have been identified in various genes, and patients can be screened for mutations in these genes to assess their level of risk for developing cancer. Traditional methods using Sanger sequencing focus on small groups of genes and therefore are unable to screen for numerous genes from several patients simultaneously. The goal of the present study was to validate a 25-gene panel to assess genetic risk for cancer in 8 different tissues using next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques. METHODS: Twenty-five genes associated with hereditary cancer syndromes were selected for development of a panel to screen for risk of these cancers using NGS. In an initial technical assessment, NGS results for BRCA1 and BRCA2 were compared with Sanger sequencing in 1864 anonymized DNA samples from patients who had undergone previous clinical testing. Next, the entire gene panel was validated using parallel NGS and Sanger sequencing in 100 anonymized DNA samples. Large rearrangement analysis was validated using NGS, microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analyses (MLPA). RESULTS: NGS identified 15,877 sequence variants, while Sanger sequencing identified 15,878 in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 comparison study of the same regions. Based on these results, the NGS process was refined prior to the validation of the full gene panel. In the validation study, NGS and Sanger sequencing were 100% concordant for the 3,923 collective variants across all genes for an analytical sensitivity of the NGS assay of >99.92% (lower limit of 95% confidence interval). NGS, microarray CGH and MLPA correctly identified all expected positive and negative large rearrangement results for the 25-gene panel. CONCLUSION: This study provides a thorough validation of the 25-gene NGS panel and indicates that this analysis tool can be used to collect clinically significant information related to risk of developing hereditary cancers. BioMed Central 2015-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4391687/ /pubmed/25886519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1224-y Text en © Judkins et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Judkins, Thaddeus Leclair, Benoît Bowles, Karla Gutin, Natalia Trost, Jeff McCulloch, James Bhatnagar, Satish Murray, Adam Craft, Jonathan Wardell, Bryan Bastian, Mark Mitchell, Jeffrey Chen, Jian Tran, Thanh Williams, Deborah Potter, Jennifer Jammulapati, Srikanth Perry, Michael Morris, Brian Roa, Benjamin Timms, Kirsten Development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk |
title | Development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk |
title_full | Development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk |
title_fullStr | Development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk |
title_short | Development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk |
title_sort | development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the brca1 and brca2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1224-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT judkinsthaddeus developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT leclairbenoit developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT bowleskarla developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT gutinnatalia developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT trostjeff developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT mccullochjames developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT bhatnagarsatish developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT murrayadam developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT craftjonathan developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT wardellbryan developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT bastianmark developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT mitchelljeffrey developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT chenjian developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT tranthanh developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT williamsdeborah developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT potterjennifer developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT jammulapatisrikanth developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT perrymichael developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT morrisbrian developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT roabenjamin developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk AT timmskirsten developmentandanalyticalvalidationofa25genenextgenerationsequencingpanelthatincludesthebrca1andbrca2genestoassesshereditarycancerrisk |