Cargando…

Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) is a novel, image-enhanced endoscopic technique for differentiating gastrointestinal neoplasms and potentially enabling pathological diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to assess the diagnostic performance of ME-NBI f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lv, Xiuhe, Wang, Chunhui, Xie, Yan, Yan, Zhaoping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25856544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123832
_version_ 1782365876131987456
author Lv, Xiuhe
Wang, Chunhui
Xie, Yan
Yan, Zhaoping
author_facet Lv, Xiuhe
Wang, Chunhui
Xie, Yan
Yan, Zhaoping
author_sort Lv, Xiuhe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) is a novel, image-enhanced endoscopic technique for differentiating gastrointestinal neoplasms and potentially enabling pathological diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to assess the diagnostic performance of ME-NBI for gastric neoplasms. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies. Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) and STATA (version 11.0) software were used for the data analysis. Random effects models were used to assess diagnostic efficacy. Heterogeneity was tested by the Q statistic and I(2) statistic. Meta-regression was used to analyze the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies, with 2151 lesions, were included. The pooled characteristics of these studies were as follows: sensitivity 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81–0.89), specificity 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95–0.97), and area under the curve (AUC) 0.9647. In the subgroup analysis, which compared the diagnostic efficacy of ME-NBI and white light imaging (WLI), the pooled sensitivity and specificity of ME-NBI were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80–0.92) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90–0.95), respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9556. In contrast, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of WLI were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.53–0.69) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.60–0.69), respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.6772. CONCLUSIONS: ME-NBI presents a high diagnostic value for gastric neoplasms and has a high specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4391823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43918232015-04-21 Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis Lv, Xiuhe Wang, Chunhui Xie, Yan Yan, Zhaoping PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) is a novel, image-enhanced endoscopic technique for differentiating gastrointestinal neoplasms and potentially enabling pathological diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to assess the diagnostic performance of ME-NBI for gastric neoplasms. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies. Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) and STATA (version 11.0) software were used for the data analysis. Random effects models were used to assess diagnostic efficacy. Heterogeneity was tested by the Q statistic and I(2) statistic. Meta-regression was used to analyze the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies, with 2151 lesions, were included. The pooled characteristics of these studies were as follows: sensitivity 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81–0.89), specificity 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95–0.97), and area under the curve (AUC) 0.9647. In the subgroup analysis, which compared the diagnostic efficacy of ME-NBI and white light imaging (WLI), the pooled sensitivity and specificity of ME-NBI were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80–0.92) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90–0.95), respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9556. In contrast, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of WLI were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.53–0.69) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.60–0.69), respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.6772. CONCLUSIONS: ME-NBI presents a high diagnostic value for gastric neoplasms and has a high specificity. Public Library of Science 2015-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4391823/ /pubmed/25856544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123832 Text en © 2015 Lv et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lv, Xiuhe
Wang, Chunhui
Xie, Yan
Yan, Zhaoping
Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort diagnostic efficacy of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for gastric neoplasms: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4391823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25856544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123832
work_keys_str_mv AT lvxiuhe diagnosticefficacyofmagnifyingendoscopywithnarrowbandimagingforgastricneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT wangchunhui diagnosticefficacyofmagnifyingendoscopywithnarrowbandimagingforgastricneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT xieyan diagnosticefficacyofmagnifyingendoscopywithnarrowbandimagingforgastricneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT yanzhaoping diagnosticefficacyofmagnifyingendoscopywithnarrowbandimagingforgastricneoplasmsametaanalysis