Cargando…
F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors
Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG-PET) has been proven useful for differentiating pancreatic ductal cancer from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. However, there are particular pancreatic tumors having various grades of malignancy such as intraductal papillary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25883884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0938-2 |
_version_ | 1782365914741604352 |
---|---|
author | Yoshioka, Masato Uchinami, Hiroshi Watanabe, Go Sato, Tsutomu Shibata, Satoshi Kume, Makoto Ishiyama, Koichi Takahashi, Satoshi Hashimoto, Manabu Yamamoto, Yuzo |
author_facet | Yoshioka, Masato Uchinami, Hiroshi Watanabe, Go Sato, Tsutomu Shibata, Satoshi Kume, Makoto Ishiyama, Koichi Takahashi, Satoshi Hashimoto, Manabu Yamamoto, Yuzo |
author_sort | Yoshioka, Masato |
collection | PubMed |
description | Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG-PET) has been proven useful for differentiating pancreatic ductal cancer from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. However, there are particular pancreatic tumors having various grades of malignancy such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. We examined whether the cut-off value of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) determined by pancreatic ductal cancers is also applicable for other pancreatic tumors. One hundred thirty six patients with pancreatic tumors underwent FDG-PET imaging. We first analyzed the cut-off value to differentiate pancreatic ductal cancers from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. Secondly, we determined the cut-off value between malignant IPMN and benign IPMN. Thirdly, we computed a cut-off value between malignant pancreatic tumors and benign tumors irrespective of tumor type. The optimal cut-off value to differentiate ductal cancers from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis was 2.5. The optimal cut-off value for differentiating malignant IPMN from benign IPMN was also 2.5, similar to that of reported studies. In all types of pancreatic tumors, the cut-off value was also 2.5. The accuracy for detecting malignancy was 93.4% for all tumors. In the FDG-PET study for pancreatic tumors, an SUV(max) of 2.5 would be justified as a cut-off value to differentiate malignant lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4392042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43920422015-04-16 F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors Yoshioka, Masato Uchinami, Hiroshi Watanabe, Go Sato, Tsutomu Shibata, Satoshi Kume, Makoto Ishiyama, Koichi Takahashi, Satoshi Hashimoto, Manabu Yamamoto, Yuzo Springerplus Research Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG-PET) has been proven useful for differentiating pancreatic ductal cancer from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. However, there are particular pancreatic tumors having various grades of malignancy such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. We examined whether the cut-off value of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) determined by pancreatic ductal cancers is also applicable for other pancreatic tumors. One hundred thirty six patients with pancreatic tumors underwent FDG-PET imaging. We first analyzed the cut-off value to differentiate pancreatic ductal cancers from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. Secondly, we determined the cut-off value between malignant IPMN and benign IPMN. Thirdly, we computed a cut-off value between malignant pancreatic tumors and benign tumors irrespective of tumor type. The optimal cut-off value to differentiate ductal cancers from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis was 2.5. The optimal cut-off value for differentiating malignant IPMN from benign IPMN was also 2.5, similar to that of reported studies. In all types of pancreatic tumors, the cut-off value was also 2.5. The accuracy for detecting malignancy was 93.4% for all tumors. In the FDG-PET study for pancreatic tumors, an SUV(max) of 2.5 would be justified as a cut-off value to differentiate malignant lesions. Springer International Publishing 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4392042/ /pubmed/25883884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0938-2 Text en © Yoshioka et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Yoshioka, Masato Uchinami, Hiroshi Watanabe, Go Sato, Tsutomu Shibata, Satoshi Kume, Makoto Ishiyama, Koichi Takahashi, Satoshi Hashimoto, Manabu Yamamoto, Yuzo F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors |
title | F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors |
title_full | F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors |
title_fullStr | F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors |
title_short | F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors |
title_sort | f-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25883884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0938-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoshiokamasato f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors AT uchinamihiroshi f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors AT watanabego f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors AT satotsutomu f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors AT shibatasatoshi f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors AT kumemakoto f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors AT ishiyamakoichi f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors AT takahashisatoshi f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors AT hashimotomanabu f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors AT yamamotoyuzo f18fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographyfordifferentialdiagnosisofpancreatictumors |