Cargando…
Pelvic exenteration – reconsidering the procedure
Pelvic exenteration remains one of the most destructive surgical procedures in gynecologic oncology, performed in patients with locally advanced malignancies who were considered for a long time as unresectable. However, for these patients, an aggressive surgical approach seems to be the only potenti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Carol Davila University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25866569 |
_version_ | 1782365925115166720 |
---|---|
author | Bacalbasa, N Balescu, I |
author_facet | Bacalbasa, N Balescu, I |
author_sort | Bacalbasa, N |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pelvic exenteration remains one of the most destructive surgical procedures in gynecologic oncology, performed in patients with locally advanced malignancies who were considered for a long time as unresectable. However, for these patients, an aggressive surgical approach seems to be the only potential curative solution. This is a literature review of the most important studies, which analyzes the benefits and the secondary risks of this demanding procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4392106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Carol Davila University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43921062015-06-01 Pelvic exenteration – reconsidering the procedure Bacalbasa, N Balescu, I J Med Life Reviews Pelvic exenteration remains one of the most destructive surgical procedures in gynecologic oncology, performed in patients with locally advanced malignancies who were considered for a long time as unresectable. However, for these patients, an aggressive surgical approach seems to be the only potential curative solution. This is a literature review of the most important studies, which analyzes the benefits and the secondary risks of this demanding procedure. Carol Davila University Press 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4392106/ /pubmed/25866569 Text en ©Carol Davila University Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Bacalbasa, N Balescu, I Pelvic exenteration – reconsidering the procedure |
title | Pelvic exenteration – reconsidering the procedure |
title_full | Pelvic exenteration – reconsidering the procedure |
title_fullStr | Pelvic exenteration – reconsidering the procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | Pelvic exenteration – reconsidering the procedure |
title_short | Pelvic exenteration – reconsidering the procedure |
title_sort | pelvic exenteration – reconsidering the procedure |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25866569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bacalbasan pelvicexenterationreconsideringtheprocedure AT balescui pelvicexenterationreconsideringtheprocedure |