Cargando…

Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age

BACKGROUND: One of the main concerns for archaeo-metallurgists and archaeologists is to determine to what extent ancient craftsmen understood the effect of metal alloy composition and were able to control it in order to produce objects with the most suitable features. This problem can be investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visco, Giovanni, Plattner, Susanne H, Guida, Giuseppe, Ridolfi, Stefano, Gigante, Giovanni E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25866557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-015-0090-7
_version_ 1782365928091025408
author Visco, Giovanni
Plattner, Susanne H
Guida, Giuseppe
Ridolfi, Stefano
Gigante, Giovanni E
author_facet Visco, Giovanni
Plattner, Susanne H
Guida, Giuseppe
Ridolfi, Stefano
Gigante, Giovanni E
author_sort Visco, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the main concerns for archaeo-metallurgists and archaeologists is to determine to what extent ancient craftsmen understood the effect of metal alloy composition and were able to control it in order to produce objects with the most suitable features. This problem can be investigated by combining compositional analyses of a high number of ancient artefacts with correlation analyses of the objects’ age, production site, destination of usage etc. – and thus chemometric data treatment is carried out. In this study, multivariate analyses were performed on a matrix composed of elemental compositional data from 134 archaeological bronze objects, obtained by XRF analyses. Analysed objects have been dated back from the Eneolithic Period to the end of the Bronze Age including the early Iron Age and were excavated in Central Italy (mainly Abruzzo Region). RESULTS: Chemometric analysis was performed attempting to visualise clouds of objects through PCA. In parallel and independently, object grouping was attempted using several different approaches, based on object characteristics (e.g. shape, weight, type of use – cutting or hitting and age) following indications given by archaeologists (or derived from the archaeological context). Furthermore, case-tailored data pretreatment (logratio-centred scaling) was used, but no homogeneous groups could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: By using chemometric data analysis, homogeneous groups of objects could not be detected, meaning that compositional data of alloys is not correlated with the considered objects’ characteristics. This favours the conclusion that – without discussing the ascertained ability of ancient foundry-men - they had also already discovered the convenience of recycling broken objects thus producing a more or less similar bronze alloy each time, depending on materials’ availability; necessary mechanical characteristics could then be obtained by post processing. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13065-015-0090-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4392119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43921192015-04-11 Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age Visco, Giovanni Plattner, Susanne H Guida, Giuseppe Ridolfi, Stefano Gigante, Giovanni E Chem Cent J Research Article BACKGROUND: One of the main concerns for archaeo-metallurgists and archaeologists is to determine to what extent ancient craftsmen understood the effect of metal alloy composition and were able to control it in order to produce objects with the most suitable features. This problem can be investigated by combining compositional analyses of a high number of ancient artefacts with correlation analyses of the objects’ age, production site, destination of usage etc. – and thus chemometric data treatment is carried out. In this study, multivariate analyses were performed on a matrix composed of elemental compositional data from 134 archaeological bronze objects, obtained by XRF analyses. Analysed objects have been dated back from the Eneolithic Period to the end of the Bronze Age including the early Iron Age and were excavated in Central Italy (mainly Abruzzo Region). RESULTS: Chemometric analysis was performed attempting to visualise clouds of objects through PCA. In parallel and independently, object grouping was attempted using several different approaches, based on object characteristics (e.g. shape, weight, type of use – cutting or hitting and age) following indications given by archaeologists (or derived from the archaeological context). Furthermore, case-tailored data pretreatment (logratio-centred scaling) was used, but no homogeneous groups could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: By using chemometric data analysis, homogeneous groups of objects could not be detected, meaning that compositional data of alloys is not correlated with the considered objects’ characteristics. This favours the conclusion that – without discussing the ascertained ability of ancient foundry-men - they had also already discovered the convenience of recycling broken objects thus producing a more or less similar bronze alloy each time, depending on materials’ availability; necessary mechanical characteristics could then be obtained by post processing. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13065-015-0090-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4392119/ /pubmed/25866557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-015-0090-7 Text en © Visco et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Visco, Giovanni
Plattner, Susanne H
Guida, Giuseppe
Ridolfi, Stefano
Gigante, Giovanni E
Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age
title Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age
title_full Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age
title_fullStr Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age
title_full_unstemmed Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age
title_short Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age
title_sort rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? a multivariate study on central italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25866557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-015-0090-7
work_keys_str_mv AT viscogiovanni ringsordaggersaxesorfibulaehaveadifferentcompositionamultivariatestudyoncentralitalybronzesfromeneolithictoearlyironage
AT plattnersusanneh ringsordaggersaxesorfibulaehaveadifferentcompositionamultivariatestudyoncentralitalybronzesfromeneolithictoearlyironage
AT guidagiuseppe ringsordaggersaxesorfibulaehaveadifferentcompositionamultivariatestudyoncentralitalybronzesfromeneolithictoearlyironage
AT ridolfistefano ringsordaggersaxesorfibulaehaveadifferentcompositionamultivariatestudyoncentralitalybronzesfromeneolithictoearlyironage
AT gigantegiovannie ringsordaggersaxesorfibulaehaveadifferentcompositionamultivariatestudyoncentralitalybronzesfromeneolithictoearlyironage