Cargando…

Anaphylactic reaction 5 minutes after the start of surgery: a case report

BACKGROUND: Natural latex rubber products have been known to cause severe anaphylactic reactions during surgery. Even 25 years after the first description of anaphylactic reactions in the literature, natural latex rubber products are still used in pediatric surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: The following...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malsy, Manuela, Leberle, Richard, Ehehalt, Katharina, Sinner, Barbara, Hobbhahn, Jonny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1060-9
_version_ 1782366023357300736
author Malsy, Manuela
Leberle, Richard
Ehehalt, Katharina
Sinner, Barbara
Hobbhahn, Jonny
author_facet Malsy, Manuela
Leberle, Richard
Ehehalt, Katharina
Sinner, Barbara
Hobbhahn, Jonny
author_sort Malsy, Manuela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Natural latex rubber products have been known to cause severe anaphylactic reactions during surgery. Even 25 years after the first description of anaphylactic reactions in the literature, natural latex rubber products are still used in pediatric surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: The following article describes the case of a healthy 4.5-year old Caucasian boy who simultaneously developed severe hypotension, tachycardia and bronchospasm during surgery for congenital strabismus sursoadductorius under uneventful anesthesia. An allergy test conducted afterwards showed natural latex rubber as the trigger for this severe intraoperative anaphylactic reaction. This case was special because of the absence of any previous clinical or anamnestical evidence of natural latex rubber allergy. The fact that the child had been previously exposed to natural latex rubber – because the boy’s mother used disposable gloves for her work as a cosmetician at home – was only discovered later. Such contact may have had a slight sensitizing effect that manifested after the initial contact with the conjunctiva through the surgeon’s natural latex rubber gloves. CONCLUSION: Natural latex rubber products have caused severe anaphylactic reactions time and again. Diagnosis is impeded by the highly variable clinical symptoms of anaphylaxis, the non-responsivity of patients, anesthesia-induced changes in blood pressure, surgical drapes, and blood loss. Therefore, use of alternative products and implementation of the right course of action in clinical routine seems to be even more important than raising awareness for allergies to natural latex rubber.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4392637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43926372015-04-11 Anaphylactic reaction 5 minutes after the start of surgery: a case report Malsy, Manuela Leberle, Richard Ehehalt, Katharina Sinner, Barbara Hobbhahn, Jonny BMC Res Notes Case Report BACKGROUND: Natural latex rubber products have been known to cause severe anaphylactic reactions during surgery. Even 25 years after the first description of anaphylactic reactions in the literature, natural latex rubber products are still used in pediatric surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: The following article describes the case of a healthy 4.5-year old Caucasian boy who simultaneously developed severe hypotension, tachycardia and bronchospasm during surgery for congenital strabismus sursoadductorius under uneventful anesthesia. An allergy test conducted afterwards showed natural latex rubber as the trigger for this severe intraoperative anaphylactic reaction. This case was special because of the absence of any previous clinical or anamnestical evidence of natural latex rubber allergy. The fact that the child had been previously exposed to natural latex rubber – because the boy’s mother used disposable gloves for her work as a cosmetician at home – was only discovered later. Such contact may have had a slight sensitizing effect that manifested after the initial contact with the conjunctiva through the surgeon’s natural latex rubber gloves. CONCLUSION: Natural latex rubber products have caused severe anaphylactic reactions time and again. Diagnosis is impeded by the highly variable clinical symptoms of anaphylaxis, the non-responsivity of patients, anesthesia-induced changes in blood pressure, surgical drapes, and blood loss. Therefore, use of alternative products and implementation of the right course of action in clinical routine seems to be even more important than raising awareness for allergies to natural latex rubber. BioMed Central 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4392637/ /pubmed/25890020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1060-9 Text en © Malsy et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Malsy, Manuela
Leberle, Richard
Ehehalt, Katharina
Sinner, Barbara
Hobbhahn, Jonny
Anaphylactic reaction 5 minutes after the start of surgery: a case report
title Anaphylactic reaction 5 minutes after the start of surgery: a case report
title_full Anaphylactic reaction 5 minutes after the start of surgery: a case report
title_fullStr Anaphylactic reaction 5 minutes after the start of surgery: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Anaphylactic reaction 5 minutes after the start of surgery: a case report
title_short Anaphylactic reaction 5 minutes after the start of surgery: a case report
title_sort anaphylactic reaction 5 minutes after the start of surgery: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1060-9
work_keys_str_mv AT malsymanuela anaphylacticreaction5minutesafterthestartofsurgeryacasereport
AT leberlerichard anaphylacticreaction5minutesafterthestartofsurgeryacasereport
AT ehehaltkatharina anaphylacticreaction5minutesafterthestartofsurgeryacasereport
AT sinnerbarbara anaphylacticreaction5minutesafterthestartofsurgeryacasereport
AT hobbhahnjonny anaphylacticreaction5minutesafterthestartofsurgeryacasereport