Cargando…

Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling

PURPOSE: To experimentally identify and quantify factors responsible for the lower sensitivity of retinal cones compared to rods. METHODS: Electrical responses of frog rods and fish (Carassius) cones to short flashes of light were recorded using the suction pipette technique. A fast solution changer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astakhova, Luba, Firsov, Michael, Govardovskii, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Vision 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25866462
_version_ 1782366024534851584
author Astakhova, Luba
Firsov, Michael
Govardovskii, Victor
author_facet Astakhova, Luba
Firsov, Michael
Govardovskii, Victor
author_sort Astakhova, Luba
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To experimentally identify and quantify factors responsible for the lower sensitivity of retinal cones compared to rods. METHODS: Electrical responses of frog rods and fish (Carassius) cones to short flashes of light were recorded using the suction pipette technique. A fast solution changer was used to apply a solution that fixed intracellular Ca(2+) concentration at the prestimulus level, thereby disabling Ca(2+) feedback, to the outer segment (OS). The results were analyzed with a specially designed mathematical model of phototransduction. The model included all basic processes of activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade but omitted unnecessary mechanistic details of each step. RESULTS: Judging from the response versus intensity curves, Carassius cones were two to three orders of magnitude less sensitive than frog rods. There was a large scatter in sensitivity among individual cones, with red-sensitive cones being on average approximately two times less sensitive than green-sensitive ones. The scatter was mostly due to different signal amplification, since the kinetic parameters of the responses among cones were far less variable than sensitivity. We argue that the generally accepted definition of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction cannot be used for comparing amplification in rods and cones, since it depends on an irrelevant factor, that is, the cell’s volume. We also show that the routinely used simplified parabolic curve fitting to an initial phase of the response leads to a few-fold underestimate of the amplification. We suggest a new definition of the amplification that only includes molecular parameters of the cascade activation, and show how it can be derived from experimental data. We found that the mathematical model with unrestrained parameters can yield an excellent fit to experimental responses. However, the fits with wildly different sets of parameters can be virtually indistinguishable, and therefore cannot provide meaningful data on underlying mechanisms. Based on results of Ca(2+)-clamp experiments, we developed an approach to strongly constrain the values of many key parameters that set the time course and sensitivity of the photoresponse (such as the dark turnover rate of cGMP, rates of turnoffs of the photoactivated visual pigment and phosphodiesterase, and kinetics of Ca(2+) feedback). We show that applying these constraints to our mathematical model enables accurate determination of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction. It appeared that, contrary to many suggestions, maximum biochemical amplification derived for “best” Carassius cones was as high as in frog rods. On the other hand, all turnoff and recovery reactions in cones proceeded approximately 10 times faster than in rods. CONCLUSIONS: The main cause of the differing sensitivity of rods and cones is cones’ ability to terminate their photoresponse faster.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4392649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Molecular Vision
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43926492015-04-10 Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling Astakhova, Luba Firsov, Michael Govardovskii, Victor Mol Vis Research Article PURPOSE: To experimentally identify and quantify factors responsible for the lower sensitivity of retinal cones compared to rods. METHODS: Electrical responses of frog rods and fish (Carassius) cones to short flashes of light were recorded using the suction pipette technique. A fast solution changer was used to apply a solution that fixed intracellular Ca(2+) concentration at the prestimulus level, thereby disabling Ca(2+) feedback, to the outer segment (OS). The results were analyzed with a specially designed mathematical model of phototransduction. The model included all basic processes of activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade but omitted unnecessary mechanistic details of each step. RESULTS: Judging from the response versus intensity curves, Carassius cones were two to three orders of magnitude less sensitive than frog rods. There was a large scatter in sensitivity among individual cones, with red-sensitive cones being on average approximately two times less sensitive than green-sensitive ones. The scatter was mostly due to different signal amplification, since the kinetic parameters of the responses among cones were far less variable than sensitivity. We argue that the generally accepted definition of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction cannot be used for comparing amplification in rods and cones, since it depends on an irrelevant factor, that is, the cell’s volume. We also show that the routinely used simplified parabolic curve fitting to an initial phase of the response leads to a few-fold underestimate of the amplification. We suggest a new definition of the amplification that only includes molecular parameters of the cascade activation, and show how it can be derived from experimental data. We found that the mathematical model with unrestrained parameters can yield an excellent fit to experimental responses. However, the fits with wildly different sets of parameters can be virtually indistinguishable, and therefore cannot provide meaningful data on underlying mechanisms. Based on results of Ca(2+)-clamp experiments, we developed an approach to strongly constrain the values of many key parameters that set the time course and sensitivity of the photoresponse (such as the dark turnover rate of cGMP, rates of turnoffs of the photoactivated visual pigment and phosphodiesterase, and kinetics of Ca(2+) feedback). We show that applying these constraints to our mathematical model enables accurate determination of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction. It appeared that, contrary to many suggestions, maximum biochemical amplification derived for “best” Carassius cones was as high as in frog rods. On the other hand, all turnoff and recovery reactions in cones proceeded approximately 10 times faster than in rods. CONCLUSIONS: The main cause of the differing sensitivity of rods and cones is cones’ ability to terminate their photoresponse faster. Molecular Vision 2015-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4392649/ /pubmed/25866462 Text en Copyright © 2015 Molecular Vision. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, used for non-commercial purposes, and is not altered or transformed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Astakhova, Luba
Firsov, Michael
Govardovskii, Victor
Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling
title Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling
title_full Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling
title_fullStr Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling
title_full_unstemmed Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling
title_short Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling
title_sort activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25866462
work_keys_str_mv AT astakhovaluba activationandquenchingofthephototransductioncascadeinretinalconesasinferredfromelectrophysiologyandmathematicalmodeling
AT firsovmichael activationandquenchingofthephototransductioncascadeinretinalconesasinferredfromelectrophysiologyandmathematicalmodeling
AT govardovskiivictor activationandquenchingofthephototransductioncascadeinretinalconesasinferredfromelectrophysiologyandmathematicalmodeling