Cargando…

National health research system in Malawi: dead, moribund, tepid or flourishing?

BACKGROUND: Several instruments at both the global and regional levels to which countries in the WHO African Region are party call for action by governments to strengthen national health research systems (NHRS). This paper debates the extent to which Malawi has fulfilled this commitment. DISCUSSION:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirigia, Joses Muthuri, Kathyola, Damson D, Muula, Adamson S, Ota, Martin Matthew Okechukwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0796-1
_version_ 1782366042556727296
author Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
Kathyola, Damson D
Muula, Adamson S
Ota, Martin Matthew Okechukwu
author_facet Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
Kathyola, Damson D
Muula, Adamson S
Ota, Martin Matthew Okechukwu
author_sort Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several instruments at both the global and regional levels to which countries in the WHO African Region are party call for action by governments to strengthen national health research systems (NHRS). This paper debates the extent to which Malawi has fulfilled this commitment. DISCUSSION: Some research literature has characterized African research – and by implication NHRS – as moribund. In our view, the Malawi government, with partner support, has made effort to strengthen the capacities of individuals and institutions that generate scientific knowledge. This is reflected in the Malawi national NHRS index (MNSR4HI) of 51%, which is within the 50%-69% range, and thus, it should be characterized as tepid with significant potential to flourish. Governance of research for health (R4H) has improved with the promulgation of the Malawi Science and Technology Act in 2003. However, lack of an explicit R4H policy, a strategic plan and a national R4H management forum undermines the government’s effectiveness in overseeing the operation of the NHRS. The mean index of ‘governance of R4H’ sub-functions was 67%, implying that research governance is tepid. Malawi has a national health research focal point, an R4H program, and four public and 11 private universities. The average index of ‘creating and sustaining resources’ sub-functions was 48.6%, meaning that R4H human and infrastructural resources can be considered to be in a moribund state. The average index of ‘producing and using research’ sub-functions of 50.4% implies that production and utilization of research findings in policy development and public health practice can best be described as tepid. Efforts need to be intensified to boost national research productivity. Over the five financial years 2011–2016 the government plans to spend 0.26% of its total health budget on R4H. The mean index of ‘financing’ sub-functions of 23.6% is within the range of 1-49%, which is considered moribund. SUMMARY: A functional NHRS is a prerequisite for the achievement of the health system goal of universal health coverage. Malawi, like majority of African countries, needs to invest more in strengthening R4H governance, developing and sustaining R4H resources, and producing and using research findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4392748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43927482015-04-11 National health research system in Malawi: dead, moribund, tepid or flourishing? Kirigia, Joses Muthuri Kathyola, Damson D Muula, Adamson S Ota, Martin Matthew Okechukwu BMC Health Serv Res Debate BACKGROUND: Several instruments at both the global and regional levels to which countries in the WHO African Region are party call for action by governments to strengthen national health research systems (NHRS). This paper debates the extent to which Malawi has fulfilled this commitment. DISCUSSION: Some research literature has characterized African research – and by implication NHRS – as moribund. In our view, the Malawi government, with partner support, has made effort to strengthen the capacities of individuals and institutions that generate scientific knowledge. This is reflected in the Malawi national NHRS index (MNSR4HI) of 51%, which is within the 50%-69% range, and thus, it should be characterized as tepid with significant potential to flourish. Governance of research for health (R4H) has improved with the promulgation of the Malawi Science and Technology Act in 2003. However, lack of an explicit R4H policy, a strategic plan and a national R4H management forum undermines the government’s effectiveness in overseeing the operation of the NHRS. The mean index of ‘governance of R4H’ sub-functions was 67%, implying that research governance is tepid. Malawi has a national health research focal point, an R4H program, and four public and 11 private universities. The average index of ‘creating and sustaining resources’ sub-functions was 48.6%, meaning that R4H human and infrastructural resources can be considered to be in a moribund state. The average index of ‘producing and using research’ sub-functions of 50.4% implies that production and utilization of research findings in policy development and public health practice can best be described as tepid. Efforts need to be intensified to boost national research productivity. Over the five financial years 2011–2016 the government plans to spend 0.26% of its total health budget on R4H. The mean index of ‘financing’ sub-functions of 23.6% is within the range of 1-49%, which is considered moribund. SUMMARY: A functional NHRS is a prerequisite for the achievement of the health system goal of universal health coverage. Malawi, like majority of African countries, needs to invest more in strengthening R4H governance, developing and sustaining R4H resources, and producing and using research findings. BioMed Central 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4392748/ /pubmed/25889757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0796-1 Text en © Kirigia et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
Kathyola, Damson D
Muula, Adamson S
Ota, Martin Matthew Okechukwu
National health research system in Malawi: dead, moribund, tepid or flourishing?
title National health research system in Malawi: dead, moribund, tepid or flourishing?
title_full National health research system in Malawi: dead, moribund, tepid or flourishing?
title_fullStr National health research system in Malawi: dead, moribund, tepid or flourishing?
title_full_unstemmed National health research system in Malawi: dead, moribund, tepid or flourishing?
title_short National health research system in Malawi: dead, moribund, tepid or flourishing?
title_sort national health research system in malawi: dead, moribund, tepid or flourishing?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0796-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kirigiajosesmuthuri nationalhealthresearchsysteminmalawideadmoribundtepidorflourishing
AT kathyoladamsond nationalhealthresearchsysteminmalawideadmoribundtepidorflourishing
AT muulaadamsons nationalhealthresearchsysteminmalawideadmoribundtepidorflourishing
AT otamartinmatthewokechukwu nationalhealthresearchsysteminmalawideadmoribundtepidorflourishing