Cargando…

Lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in North America. Exposure to cotton dust has previously been reported to decrease the risk of lung cancer. METHODS: We used data from two large case-control studies conducted in Montreal from 1979-1986 (Study 1) and 1996-2002 (Study 2) re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Krista Yorita, Lavoué, Jérôme, Rousseau, Marie-Claude, Siemiatycki, Jack
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1206-0
_version_ 1782366049860059136
author Christensen, Krista Yorita
Lavoué, Jérôme
Rousseau, Marie-Claude
Siemiatycki, Jack
author_facet Christensen, Krista Yorita
Lavoué, Jérôme
Rousseau, Marie-Claude
Siemiatycki, Jack
author_sort Christensen, Krista Yorita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in North America. Exposure to cotton dust has previously been reported to decrease the risk of lung cancer. METHODS: We used data from two large case-control studies conducted in Montreal from 1979-1986 (Study 1) and 1996-2002 (Study 2) respectively, to examine the association between occupational exposure to cotton dust and risk of lung cancer. Cases were diagnosed with incident histologically-confirmed lung cancer (857 in Study 1, 1203 in Study 2). Population controls were randomly selected from electoral lists and frequency-matched to cases by age and sex (533 in Study 1, 1513 in Study 2). Interviews for the two studies used a virtually identical questionnaire to obtain lifetime occupational and smoking history, and several lifestyle covariates. Each participant’s lifetime occupational history was reviewed by experts to assess exposure to a number of occupational agents, including cotton dust. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of exposure to cotton dust was approximately 10%-15% in both studies combined, with some variation by study and by sex. Overall there was no decreased risk of lung cancer among subjects exposed to cotton dust. Rather, among all subjects there was a suggestion of slightly increased risk associated with any lifetime exposure to cotton dust (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.5). This risk appeared to be concentrated among cases of adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.2), and among moderate and heavy smokers (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0-1.7). There was no association when restricting to cases of either squamous cell or small cell cancer, or among never smokers and light smokers. An analogous examination of subjects exposed to wool dust revealed neither increased nor decreased risks of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that cotton dust exposure decreased risks of lung cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4392806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43928062015-04-11 Lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies Christensen, Krista Yorita Lavoué, Jérôme Rousseau, Marie-Claude Siemiatycki, Jack BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in North America. Exposure to cotton dust has previously been reported to decrease the risk of lung cancer. METHODS: We used data from two large case-control studies conducted in Montreal from 1979-1986 (Study 1) and 1996-2002 (Study 2) respectively, to examine the association between occupational exposure to cotton dust and risk of lung cancer. Cases were diagnosed with incident histologically-confirmed lung cancer (857 in Study 1, 1203 in Study 2). Population controls were randomly selected from electoral lists and frequency-matched to cases by age and sex (533 in Study 1, 1513 in Study 2). Interviews for the two studies used a virtually identical questionnaire to obtain lifetime occupational and smoking history, and several lifestyle covariates. Each participant’s lifetime occupational history was reviewed by experts to assess exposure to a number of occupational agents, including cotton dust. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of exposure to cotton dust was approximately 10%-15% in both studies combined, with some variation by study and by sex. Overall there was no decreased risk of lung cancer among subjects exposed to cotton dust. Rather, among all subjects there was a suggestion of slightly increased risk associated with any lifetime exposure to cotton dust (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.5). This risk appeared to be concentrated among cases of adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.2), and among moderate and heavy smokers (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0-1.7). There was no association when restricting to cases of either squamous cell or small cell cancer, or among never smokers and light smokers. An analogous examination of subjects exposed to wool dust revealed neither increased nor decreased risks of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that cotton dust exposure decreased risks of lung cancer. BioMed Central 2015-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4392806/ /pubmed/25885029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1206-0 Text en © Yorita Christensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christensen, Krista Yorita
Lavoué, Jérôme
Rousseau, Marie-Claude
Siemiatycki, Jack
Lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies
title Lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies
title_full Lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies
title_fullStr Lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies
title_full_unstemmed Lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies
title_short Lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies
title_sort lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1206-0
work_keys_str_mv AT christensenkristayorita lackofaprotectiveeffectofcottondustonriskoflungcancerevidencefromtwopopulationbasedcasecontrolstudies
AT lavouejerome lackofaprotectiveeffectofcottondustonriskoflungcancerevidencefromtwopopulationbasedcasecontrolstudies
AT rousseaumarieclaude lackofaprotectiveeffectofcottondustonriskoflungcancerevidencefromtwopopulationbasedcasecontrolstudies
AT siemiatyckijack lackofaprotectiveeffectofcottondustonriskoflungcancerevidencefromtwopopulationbasedcasecontrolstudies