Cargando…
Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation
A recent study by Marinovic et al. (J. Neurophysiol., 2013, 109: 996–1008) used a loud acoustic stimulus to probe motor preparation in a simple reaction time (RT) task. Based on decreasing RT latency and increases in motor output measures as the probe stimulus approached the “go” stimulus, the autho...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25663524 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12300 |
_version_ | 1782366125949976576 |
---|---|
author | Maslovat, Dana Franks, Ian M Leguerrier, Alexandra Carlsen, Anthony N |
author_facet | Maslovat, Dana Franks, Ian M Leguerrier, Alexandra Carlsen, Anthony N |
author_sort | Maslovat, Dana |
collection | PubMed |
description | A recent study by Marinovic et al. (J. Neurophysiol., 2013, 109: 996–1008) used a loud acoustic stimulus to probe motor preparation in a simple reaction time (RT) task. Based on decreasing RT latency and increases in motor output measures as the probe stimulus approached the “go” stimulus, the authors concluded that response-related activation increased abruptly 65 ms prior to the imperative stimulus, a result in contrast to previous literature. However, this study did not measure reflexive startle activity in the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle, which has been used to delineate between response triggering by a loud acoustic stimuli and effects of stimulus intensity and/or intersensory facilitation. Due to this methodological limitation, it was unclear if the data accurately represented movement-related activation changes. In order to provide a measure as to whether response triggering occurred on each trial, the current experiment replicated the study by Marinovic et al., with the collection of muscle activation in the SCM. While the replication analyses involving all trials confirmed similar results to those reported by Marinovic et al., when data were limited to those in which startle-related SCM activation occurred, the results indicated that movement-related activation is constant in the 65 ms prior to action initiation. The difference between analyses suggests that when SCM activation is not considered, results may be confounded by trials in which the probe stimulus does not trigger the prepared response. Furthermore, these results provide additional confirmation that reflexive startle activation in the SCM is a robust indicator of response triggering by a loud acoustic stimulus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4393208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43932082015-04-20 Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation Maslovat, Dana Franks, Ian M Leguerrier, Alexandra Carlsen, Anthony N Physiol Rep Original Research A recent study by Marinovic et al. (J. Neurophysiol., 2013, 109: 996–1008) used a loud acoustic stimulus to probe motor preparation in a simple reaction time (RT) task. Based on decreasing RT latency and increases in motor output measures as the probe stimulus approached the “go” stimulus, the authors concluded that response-related activation increased abruptly 65 ms prior to the imperative stimulus, a result in contrast to previous literature. However, this study did not measure reflexive startle activity in the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle, which has been used to delineate between response triggering by a loud acoustic stimuli and effects of stimulus intensity and/or intersensory facilitation. Due to this methodological limitation, it was unclear if the data accurately represented movement-related activation changes. In order to provide a measure as to whether response triggering occurred on each trial, the current experiment replicated the study by Marinovic et al., with the collection of muscle activation in the SCM. While the replication analyses involving all trials confirmed similar results to those reported by Marinovic et al., when data were limited to those in which startle-related SCM activation occurred, the results indicated that movement-related activation is constant in the 65 ms prior to action initiation. The difference between analyses suggests that when SCM activation is not considered, results may be confounded by trials in which the probe stimulus does not trigger the prepared response. Furthermore, these results provide additional confirmation that reflexive startle activation in the SCM is a robust indicator of response triggering by a loud acoustic stimulus. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4393208/ /pubmed/25663524 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12300 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Maslovat, Dana Franks, Ian M Leguerrier, Alexandra Carlsen, Anthony N Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation |
title | Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation |
title_full | Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation |
title_fullStr | Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed | Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation |
title_short | Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation |
title_sort | responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25663524 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maslovatdana responsestostartlingacousticstimuliindicatethatmovementrelatedactivationisconstantpriortoactionareplicationwithanalternateinterpretation AT franksianm responsestostartlingacousticstimuliindicatethatmovementrelatedactivationisconstantpriortoactionareplicationwithanalternateinterpretation AT leguerrieralexandra responsestostartlingacousticstimuliindicatethatmovementrelatedactivationisconstantpriortoactionareplicationwithanalternateinterpretation AT carlsenanthonyn responsestostartlingacousticstimuliindicatethatmovementrelatedactivationisconstantpriortoactionareplicationwithanalternateinterpretation |