Cargando…
Potential explanation of limb combination performance differences for two-limb coordination tasks
Rhythmic two-limb coordinated movements in the sagittal plane are variable and inaccurate when the movements are in the opposite direction as compared with those in the same direction (directional constraint). The magnitude of directional constraint depends on the particular limb combination. It is...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25713327 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12301 |
_version_ | 1782366126200586240 |
---|---|
author | Nakagawa, Kento Muraoka, Tetsuro Kanosue, Kazuyuki |
author_facet | Nakagawa, Kento Muraoka, Tetsuro Kanosue, Kazuyuki |
author_sort | Nakagawa, Kento |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rhythmic two-limb coordinated movements in the sagittal plane are variable and inaccurate when the movements are in the opposite direction as compared with those in the same direction (directional constraint). The magnitude of directional constraint depends on the particular limb combination. It is prominent in ipsilateral hand-foot coordination, but minimal in bimanual hand coordination. The reason for such differences remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the possible mechanisms underlying the production of the difference that depend on limb combination. Subjects performed two-limb rhythmic coordinated movements either in the same or in the opposite direction for three separate limb combinations (bilateral hands, contralateral hand and foot, and ipsilateral hand and foot). For each combination two different tasks were performed. In the first condition, subjects actively moved two limbs (active condition). Second, subjects actively moved one limb in coordination with a passively moved limb (passive condition). In the active condition, the directional constraint was dependent upon the limb combination, as reported in previous studies; the directional constraint was quite prominent in ipsilateral combinations, intermediate in contralateral combinations, and minimal for bilateral combination. However, differences in the directional constraint did not depend on limb combination for any combination in the passive conditions which apparently utilized closed-loop control. In other word, the difference depending on limb combination disappeared when control strategies become uniformly closed-loop. Thus, we speculate that the control strategy utilized depends on limb combination in the active condition. Additionally, different mechanisms other than closed-loop control also would have influence depending on the particular limb combination. This may result in differences in performance depending upon the limb combination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4393209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43932092015-04-20 Potential explanation of limb combination performance differences for two-limb coordination tasks Nakagawa, Kento Muraoka, Tetsuro Kanosue, Kazuyuki Physiol Rep Original Research Rhythmic two-limb coordinated movements in the sagittal plane are variable and inaccurate when the movements are in the opposite direction as compared with those in the same direction (directional constraint). The magnitude of directional constraint depends on the particular limb combination. It is prominent in ipsilateral hand-foot coordination, but minimal in bimanual hand coordination. The reason for such differences remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the possible mechanisms underlying the production of the difference that depend on limb combination. Subjects performed two-limb rhythmic coordinated movements either in the same or in the opposite direction for three separate limb combinations (bilateral hands, contralateral hand and foot, and ipsilateral hand and foot). For each combination two different tasks were performed. In the first condition, subjects actively moved two limbs (active condition). Second, subjects actively moved one limb in coordination with a passively moved limb (passive condition). In the active condition, the directional constraint was dependent upon the limb combination, as reported in previous studies; the directional constraint was quite prominent in ipsilateral combinations, intermediate in contralateral combinations, and minimal for bilateral combination. However, differences in the directional constraint did not depend on limb combination for any combination in the passive conditions which apparently utilized closed-loop control. In other word, the difference depending on limb combination disappeared when control strategies become uniformly closed-loop. Thus, we speculate that the control strategy utilized depends on limb combination in the active condition. Additionally, different mechanisms other than closed-loop control also would have influence depending on the particular limb combination. This may result in differences in performance depending upon the limb combination. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4393209/ /pubmed/25713327 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12301 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nakagawa, Kento Muraoka, Tetsuro Kanosue, Kazuyuki Potential explanation of limb combination performance differences for two-limb coordination tasks |
title | Potential explanation of limb combination performance differences for two-limb coordination tasks |
title_full | Potential explanation of limb combination performance differences for two-limb coordination tasks |
title_fullStr | Potential explanation of limb combination performance differences for two-limb coordination tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Potential explanation of limb combination performance differences for two-limb coordination tasks |
title_short | Potential explanation of limb combination performance differences for two-limb coordination tasks |
title_sort | potential explanation of limb combination performance differences for two-limb coordination tasks |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25713327 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12301 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakagawakento potentialexplanationoflimbcombinationperformancedifferencesfortwolimbcoordinationtasks AT muraokatetsuro potentialexplanationoflimbcombinationperformancedifferencesfortwolimbcoordinationtasks AT kanosuekazuyuki potentialexplanationoflimbcombinationperformancedifferencesfortwolimbcoordinationtasks |