Cargando…
A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia
BACKGROUND: This protocol describes a study evaluating two ‘Housing First’ programs, Platform 70 and Common Ground, presently being implemented in the inner-city region of Sydney, Australia. The Housing First approach prioritises housing individuals who are homeless in standard lease agreement tenan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y |
_version_ | 1782366219061428224 |
---|---|
author | Whittaker, Elizabeth Swift, Wendy Flatau, Paul Dobbins, Timothy Schollar-Root, Olivia Burns, Lucinda |
author_facet | Whittaker, Elizabeth Swift, Wendy Flatau, Paul Dobbins, Timothy Schollar-Root, Olivia Burns, Lucinda |
author_sort | Whittaker, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This protocol describes a study evaluating two ‘Housing First’ programs, Platform 70 and Common Ground, presently being implemented in the inner-city region of Sydney, Australia. The Housing First approach prioritises housing individuals who are homeless in standard lease agreement tenancies as rapidly as possible to lock in the benefits from long-term accommodation, even where the person may not be seen as ‘housing ready’. METHODS/DESIGN: The longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation utilises both quantitative and qualitative data collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up time points. For the quantitative component, clients of each program were invited to complete client surveys that reported on several factors associated with chronic homelessness and were hypothesised to improve under stable housing, including physical and mental health status and treatment rates, quality of life, substance use patterns, and contact with the health and criminal justice systems. Semi-structured interviews with clients and stakeholders comprised the qualitative component and focused on individual experiences with, and perceptions of, the two programs. In addition, program data on housing stability, rental subsidies and support levels provided to clients by agencies was collected and will be used in conjunction with the client survey data to undertake an economic evaluation of the two programs. DISCUSSION: This study will systematically evaluate the efficacy of a scatter site model (Platform 70) and a congregated model (Common Ground) of the Housing First approach; an examination that has not yet been made either in Australia or internationally. A clear strength of the study is its timing. It was designed and implemented as the programs in question themselves were introduced. Moreover, the programs were introduced when the Australian Government, with State and Territory support, began a more focused, coordinated response to homelessness and funded rapid expansion of innovative homelessness programs across the country, including Common Ground supportive housing developments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4393870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43938702015-04-13 A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia Whittaker, Elizabeth Swift, Wendy Flatau, Paul Dobbins, Timothy Schollar-Root, Olivia Burns, Lucinda BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: This protocol describes a study evaluating two ‘Housing First’ programs, Platform 70 and Common Ground, presently being implemented in the inner-city region of Sydney, Australia. The Housing First approach prioritises housing individuals who are homeless in standard lease agreement tenancies as rapidly as possible to lock in the benefits from long-term accommodation, even where the person may not be seen as ‘housing ready’. METHODS/DESIGN: The longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation utilises both quantitative and qualitative data collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up time points. For the quantitative component, clients of each program were invited to complete client surveys that reported on several factors associated with chronic homelessness and were hypothesised to improve under stable housing, including physical and mental health status and treatment rates, quality of life, substance use patterns, and contact with the health and criminal justice systems. Semi-structured interviews with clients and stakeholders comprised the qualitative component and focused on individual experiences with, and perceptions of, the two programs. In addition, program data on housing stability, rental subsidies and support levels provided to clients by agencies was collected and will be used in conjunction with the client survey data to undertake an economic evaluation of the two programs. DISCUSSION: This study will systematically evaluate the efficacy of a scatter site model (Platform 70) and a congregated model (Common Ground) of the Housing First approach; an examination that has not yet been made either in Australia or internationally. A clear strength of the study is its timing. It was designed and implemented as the programs in question themselves were introduced. Moreover, the programs were introduced when the Australian Government, with State and Territory support, began a more focused, coordinated response to homelessness and funded rapid expansion of innovative homelessness programs across the country, including Common Ground supportive housing developments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4393870/ /pubmed/25884465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y Text en © Whittaker et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Whittaker, Elizabeth Swift, Wendy Flatau, Paul Dobbins, Timothy Schollar-Root, Olivia Burns, Lucinda A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia |
title | A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia |
title_full | A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia |
title_fullStr | A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia |
title_short | A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia |
title_sort | place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in sydney, australia |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whittakerelizabeth aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT swiftwendy aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT flataupaul aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT dobbinstimothy aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT schollarrootolivia aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT burnslucinda aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT whittakerelizabeth placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT swiftwendy placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT flataupaul placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT dobbinstimothy placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT schollarrootolivia placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia AT burnslucinda placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia |