Cargando…

A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia

BACKGROUND: This protocol describes a study evaluating two ‘Housing First’ programs, Platform 70 and Common Ground, presently being implemented in the inner-city region of Sydney, Australia. The Housing First approach prioritises housing individuals who are homeless in standard lease agreement tenan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whittaker, Elizabeth, Swift, Wendy, Flatau, Paul, Dobbins, Timothy, Schollar-Root, Olivia, Burns, Lucinda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y
_version_ 1782366219061428224
author Whittaker, Elizabeth
Swift, Wendy
Flatau, Paul
Dobbins, Timothy
Schollar-Root, Olivia
Burns, Lucinda
author_facet Whittaker, Elizabeth
Swift, Wendy
Flatau, Paul
Dobbins, Timothy
Schollar-Root, Olivia
Burns, Lucinda
author_sort Whittaker, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This protocol describes a study evaluating two ‘Housing First’ programs, Platform 70 and Common Ground, presently being implemented in the inner-city region of Sydney, Australia. The Housing First approach prioritises housing individuals who are homeless in standard lease agreement tenancies as rapidly as possible to lock in the benefits from long-term accommodation, even where the person may not be seen as ‘housing ready’. METHODS/DESIGN: The longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation utilises both quantitative and qualitative data collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up time points. For the quantitative component, clients of each program were invited to complete client surveys that reported on several factors associated with chronic homelessness and were hypothesised to improve under stable housing, including physical and mental health status and treatment rates, quality of life, substance use patterns, and contact with the health and criminal justice systems. Semi-structured interviews with clients and stakeholders comprised the qualitative component and focused on individual experiences with, and perceptions of, the two programs. In addition, program data on housing stability, rental subsidies and support levels provided to clients by agencies was collected and will be used in conjunction with the client survey data to undertake an economic evaluation of the two programs. DISCUSSION: This study will systematically evaluate the efficacy of a scatter site model (Platform 70) and a congregated model (Common Ground) of the Housing First approach; an examination that has not yet been made either in Australia or internationally. A clear strength of the study is its timing. It was designed and implemented as the programs in question themselves were introduced. Moreover, the programs were introduced when the Australian Government, with State and Territory support, began a more focused, coordinated response to homelessness and funded rapid expansion of innovative homelessness programs across the country, including Common Ground supportive housing developments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4393870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43938702015-04-13 A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia Whittaker, Elizabeth Swift, Wendy Flatau, Paul Dobbins, Timothy Schollar-Root, Olivia Burns, Lucinda BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: This protocol describes a study evaluating two ‘Housing First’ programs, Platform 70 and Common Ground, presently being implemented in the inner-city region of Sydney, Australia. The Housing First approach prioritises housing individuals who are homeless in standard lease agreement tenancies as rapidly as possible to lock in the benefits from long-term accommodation, even where the person may not be seen as ‘housing ready’. METHODS/DESIGN: The longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation utilises both quantitative and qualitative data collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up time points. For the quantitative component, clients of each program were invited to complete client surveys that reported on several factors associated with chronic homelessness and were hypothesised to improve under stable housing, including physical and mental health status and treatment rates, quality of life, substance use patterns, and contact with the health and criminal justice systems. Semi-structured interviews with clients and stakeholders comprised the qualitative component and focused on individual experiences with, and perceptions of, the two programs. In addition, program data on housing stability, rental subsidies and support levels provided to clients by agencies was collected and will be used in conjunction with the client survey data to undertake an economic evaluation of the two programs. DISCUSSION: This study will systematically evaluate the efficacy of a scatter site model (Platform 70) and a congregated model (Common Ground) of the Housing First approach; an examination that has not yet been made either in Australia or internationally. A clear strength of the study is its timing. It was designed and implemented as the programs in question themselves were introduced. Moreover, the programs were introduced when the Australian Government, with State and Territory support, began a more focused, coordinated response to homelessness and funded rapid expansion of innovative homelessness programs across the country, including Common Ground supportive housing developments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4393870/ /pubmed/25884465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y Text en © Whittaker et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Whittaker, Elizabeth
Swift, Wendy
Flatau, Paul
Dobbins, Timothy
Schollar-Root, Olivia
Burns, Lucinda
A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia
title A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia
title_full A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia
title_fullStr A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia
title_full_unstemmed A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia
title_short A place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in Sydney, Australia
title_sort place to call home: study protocol for a longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of two housing first adaptations in sydney, australia
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1700-y
work_keys_str_mv AT whittakerelizabeth aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT swiftwendy aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT flataupaul aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT dobbinstimothy aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT schollarrootolivia aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT burnslucinda aplacetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT whittakerelizabeth placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT swiftwendy placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT flataupaul placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT dobbinstimothy placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT schollarrootolivia placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia
AT burnslucinda placetocallhomestudyprotocolforalongitudinalmixedmethodsevaluationoftwohousingfirstadaptationsinsydneyaustralia