Cargando…

Use of pethidine for percutaneous liver biopsy – a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is the “gold standard” in the diagnosis of liver diseases. A pilot trial has shown pethidine may reduce anxiety and the need for post-procedural pain relief. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of pre-procedural pethidine. METHODS: A double-b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Antony, Alansari, Mohammed, Lubcke, Ralf, Schlup, Martin, Williams, Merrilee, Fraser, Margaret, Buckingham, Sarah, Schultz, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4394400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0264-8
_version_ 1782366275473768448
author Pan, Antony
Alansari, Mohammed
Lubcke, Ralf
Schlup, Martin
Williams, Merrilee
Fraser, Margaret
Buckingham, Sarah
Schultz, Michael
author_facet Pan, Antony
Alansari, Mohammed
Lubcke, Ralf
Schlup, Martin
Williams, Merrilee
Fraser, Margaret
Buckingham, Sarah
Schultz, Michael
author_sort Pan, Antony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is the “gold standard” in the diagnosis of liver diseases. A pilot trial has shown pethidine may reduce anxiety and the need for post-procedural pain relief. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of pre-procedural pethidine. METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess the need for pethidine prior to PLB. 98 patients were randomly assigned to receive either 50 mg pethidine i.v. (n = 48), or an equal volume of 0.9% normal saline (n = 50). PLB was performed with ultrasound guidance after adequate local anaesthesia with xylocaine. Patients were asked to self-evaluate pain experienced using a visual analogue score (0–10) immediately and an hour after PLB. Patients were then followed up 24 hours after the procedure to assess their pain score, retrospective pain score and willingness to have a repeat procedure. RESULTS: Pethidine administration resulted in significantly lower pain scores (0.60 ± 0.1 vs 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.006) and required less analgesia (0% vs 10%, p = 0.03) immediately after PLB in comparison to the placebo group. There was no significant difference in the pain score and analgesia requirement one hour after the procedure, the pain score at 24 hours after procedure and retrospective pain score. 94% of all patients of either group are willing to under go a repeat liver biopsy (NS). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of pethidine routinely prior to PLB reduces the immediate post procedural pain but has no lasting effect and does not influence the patients’ decision making process for future investigations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614001194651, 13 November 2014
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4394400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43944002015-04-14 Use of pethidine for percutaneous liver biopsy – a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study Pan, Antony Alansari, Mohammed Lubcke, Ralf Schlup, Martin Williams, Merrilee Fraser, Margaret Buckingham, Sarah Schultz, Michael BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is the “gold standard” in the diagnosis of liver diseases. A pilot trial has shown pethidine may reduce anxiety and the need for post-procedural pain relief. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of pre-procedural pethidine. METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess the need for pethidine prior to PLB. 98 patients were randomly assigned to receive either 50 mg pethidine i.v. (n = 48), or an equal volume of 0.9% normal saline (n = 50). PLB was performed with ultrasound guidance after adequate local anaesthesia with xylocaine. Patients were asked to self-evaluate pain experienced using a visual analogue score (0–10) immediately and an hour after PLB. Patients were then followed up 24 hours after the procedure to assess their pain score, retrospective pain score and willingness to have a repeat procedure. RESULTS: Pethidine administration resulted in significantly lower pain scores (0.60 ± 0.1 vs 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.006) and required less analgesia (0% vs 10%, p = 0.03) immediately after PLB in comparison to the placebo group. There was no significant difference in the pain score and analgesia requirement one hour after the procedure, the pain score at 24 hours after procedure and retrospective pain score. 94% of all patients of either group are willing to under go a repeat liver biopsy (NS). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of pethidine routinely prior to PLB reduces the immediate post procedural pain but has no lasting effect and does not influence the patients’ decision making process for future investigations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614001194651, 13 November 2014 BioMed Central 2015-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4394400/ /pubmed/25888092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0264-8 Text en © Pan et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pan, Antony
Alansari, Mohammed
Lubcke, Ralf
Schlup, Martin
Williams, Merrilee
Fraser, Margaret
Buckingham, Sarah
Schultz, Michael
Use of pethidine for percutaneous liver biopsy – a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study
title Use of pethidine for percutaneous liver biopsy – a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study
title_full Use of pethidine for percutaneous liver biopsy – a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study
title_fullStr Use of pethidine for percutaneous liver biopsy – a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study
title_full_unstemmed Use of pethidine for percutaneous liver biopsy – a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study
title_short Use of pethidine for percutaneous liver biopsy – a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study
title_sort use of pethidine for percutaneous liver biopsy – a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4394400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0264-8
work_keys_str_mv AT panantony useofpethidineforpercutaneousliverbiopsyarandomisedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindstudy
AT alansarimohammed useofpethidineforpercutaneousliverbiopsyarandomisedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindstudy
AT lubckeralf useofpethidineforpercutaneousliverbiopsyarandomisedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindstudy
AT schlupmartin useofpethidineforpercutaneousliverbiopsyarandomisedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindstudy
AT williamsmerrilee useofpethidineforpercutaneousliverbiopsyarandomisedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindstudy
AT frasermargaret useofpethidineforpercutaneousliverbiopsyarandomisedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindstudy
AT buckinghamsarah useofpethidineforpercutaneousliverbiopsyarandomisedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindstudy
AT schultzmichael useofpethidineforpercutaneousliverbiopsyarandomisedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindstudy