Cargando…
The Method Quality of Cross-Over Studies Involved in Cochrane Systematic Reviews
BACKGROUND: It is possible that cross-over studies included in current systematic reviews are being inadequately assessed, because the current risk of bias tools do not consider possible biases specific to cross-over design. We performed this study to evaluate whether this was being done in cross-ov...
Autores principales: | Ding, Hong, Hu, Guang Li, Zheng, Xue Yan, Chen, Qing, Threapleton, Diane Erin, Zhou, Zeng Huan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25867772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120519 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
por: Ji, Zhaochen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
por: Zhang, Xuan, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Cochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods
por: Chandler, Jackie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)