Cargando…

Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors

The potential for complex synergistic or antagonistic interactions between multiple stressors presents one of the largest uncertainties when predicting ecological change but, despite common use of the terms in the scientific literature, a consensus on their operational definition is still lacking. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piggott, Jeremy J, Townsend, Colin R, Matthaei, Christoph D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25897392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1465
_version_ 1782366388260700160
author Piggott, Jeremy J
Townsend, Colin R
Matthaei, Christoph D
author_facet Piggott, Jeremy J
Townsend, Colin R
Matthaei, Christoph D
author_sort Piggott, Jeremy J
collection PubMed
description The potential for complex synergistic or antagonistic interactions between multiple stressors presents one of the largest uncertainties when predicting ecological change but, despite common use of the terms in the scientific literature, a consensus on their operational definition is still lacking. The identification of synergism or antagonism is generally straightforward when stressors operate in the same direction, but if individual stressor effects oppose each other, the definition of synergism is paradoxical because what is synergistic to one stressor's effect direction is antagonistic to the others. In their highly cited meta-analysis, Crain et al. (Ecology Letters, 11, 2008: 1304) assumed in situations with opposing individual effects that synergy only occurs when the cumulative effect is more negative than the additive sum of the opposing individual effects. We argue against this and propose a new systematic classification based on an additive effects model that combines the magnitude and response direction of the cumulative effect and the interaction effect. A new class of “mitigating synergism” is identified, where cumulative effects are reversed and enhanced. We applied our directional classification to the dataset compiled by Crain et al. (Ecology Letters, 11, 2008: 1304) to determine the prevalence of synergistic, antagonistic, and additive interactions. Compared to their original analysis, we report differences in the representation of interaction classes by interaction type and we document examples of mitigating synergism, highlighting the importance of incorporating individual stressor effect directions in the determination of synergisms and antagonisms. This is particularly pertinent given a general bias in ecology toward investigating and reporting adverse multiple stressor effects (double negative). We emphasize the need for reconsideration by the ecological community of the interpretation of synergism and antagonism in situations where individual stressor effects oppose each other or where cumulative effects are reversed and enhanced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4395182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43951822015-04-20 Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors Piggott, Jeremy J Townsend, Colin R Matthaei, Christoph D Ecol Evol Original Research The potential for complex synergistic or antagonistic interactions between multiple stressors presents one of the largest uncertainties when predicting ecological change but, despite common use of the terms in the scientific literature, a consensus on their operational definition is still lacking. The identification of synergism or antagonism is generally straightforward when stressors operate in the same direction, but if individual stressor effects oppose each other, the definition of synergism is paradoxical because what is synergistic to one stressor's effect direction is antagonistic to the others. In their highly cited meta-analysis, Crain et al. (Ecology Letters, 11, 2008: 1304) assumed in situations with opposing individual effects that synergy only occurs when the cumulative effect is more negative than the additive sum of the opposing individual effects. We argue against this and propose a new systematic classification based on an additive effects model that combines the magnitude and response direction of the cumulative effect and the interaction effect. A new class of “mitigating synergism” is identified, where cumulative effects are reversed and enhanced. We applied our directional classification to the dataset compiled by Crain et al. (Ecology Letters, 11, 2008: 1304) to determine the prevalence of synergistic, antagonistic, and additive interactions. Compared to their original analysis, we report differences in the representation of interaction classes by interaction type and we document examples of mitigating synergism, highlighting the importance of incorporating individual stressor effect directions in the determination of synergisms and antagonisms. This is particularly pertinent given a general bias in ecology toward investigating and reporting adverse multiple stressor effects (double negative). We emphasize the need for reconsideration by the ecological community of the interpretation of synergism and antagonism in situations where individual stressor effects oppose each other or where cumulative effects are reversed and enhanced. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-04 2015-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4395182/ /pubmed/25897392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1465 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Piggott, Jeremy J
Townsend, Colin R
Matthaei, Christoph D
Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors
title Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors
title_full Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors
title_fullStr Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors
title_full_unstemmed Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors
title_short Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors
title_sort reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25897392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1465
work_keys_str_mv AT piggottjeremyj reconceptualizingsynergismandantagonismamongmultiplestressors
AT townsendcolinr reconceptualizingsynergismandantagonismamongmultiplestressors
AT matthaeichristophd reconceptualizingsynergismandantagonismamongmultiplestressors