Cargando…
Statistical Distance as a Measure of Physiological Dysregulation Is Largely Robust to Variation in Its Biomarker Composition
Physiological dysregulation may underlie aging and many chronic diseases, but is challenging to quantify because of the complexity of the underlying systems. Recently, we described a measure of physiological dysregulation, D(M), that uses statistical distance to assess the degree to which an individ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122541 |
_version_ | 1782366436103028736 |
---|---|
author | Cohen, Alan A. Li, Qing Milot, Emmanuel Leroux, Maxime Faucher, Samuel Morissette-Thomas, Vincent Legault, Véronique Fried, Linda P. Ferrucci, Luigi |
author_facet | Cohen, Alan A. Li, Qing Milot, Emmanuel Leroux, Maxime Faucher, Samuel Morissette-Thomas, Vincent Legault, Véronique Fried, Linda P. Ferrucci, Luigi |
author_sort | Cohen, Alan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Physiological dysregulation may underlie aging and many chronic diseases, but is challenging to quantify because of the complexity of the underlying systems. Recently, we described a measure of physiological dysregulation, D(M), that uses statistical distance to assess the degree to which an individual’s biomarker profile is normal versus aberrant. However, the sensitivity of D(M) to details of the calculation method has not yet been systematically assessed. In particular, the number and choice of biomarkers and the definition of the reference population (RP, the population used to define a “normal” profile) may be important. Here, we address this question by validating the method on 44 common clinical biomarkers from three longitudinal cohort studies and one cross-sectional survey. D(M)s calculated on different biomarker subsets show that while the signal of physiological dysregulation increases with the number of biomarkers included, the value of additional markers diminishes as more are added and inclusion of 10-15 is generally sufficient. As long as enough markers are included, individual markers have little effect on the final metric, and even D(M)s calculated from mutually exclusive groups of markers correlate with each other at r~0.4-0.5. We also used data subsets to generate thousands of combinations of study populations and RPs to address sensitivity to differences in age range, sex, race, data set, sample size, and their interactions. Results were largely consistent (but not identical) regardless of the choice of RP; however, the signal was generally clearer with a younger and healthier RP, and RPs too different from the study population performed poorly. Accordingly, biomarker and RP choice are not particularly important in most cases, but caution should be used across very different populations or for fine-scale analyses. Biologically, the lack of sensitivity to marker choice and better performance of younger, healthier RPs confirm an interpretation of D(M) physiological dysregulation and as an emergent property of a complex system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4395377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43953772015-04-21 Statistical Distance as a Measure of Physiological Dysregulation Is Largely Robust to Variation in Its Biomarker Composition Cohen, Alan A. Li, Qing Milot, Emmanuel Leroux, Maxime Faucher, Samuel Morissette-Thomas, Vincent Legault, Véronique Fried, Linda P. Ferrucci, Luigi PLoS One Research Article Physiological dysregulation may underlie aging and many chronic diseases, but is challenging to quantify because of the complexity of the underlying systems. Recently, we described a measure of physiological dysregulation, D(M), that uses statistical distance to assess the degree to which an individual’s biomarker profile is normal versus aberrant. However, the sensitivity of D(M) to details of the calculation method has not yet been systematically assessed. In particular, the number and choice of biomarkers and the definition of the reference population (RP, the population used to define a “normal” profile) may be important. Here, we address this question by validating the method on 44 common clinical biomarkers from three longitudinal cohort studies and one cross-sectional survey. D(M)s calculated on different biomarker subsets show that while the signal of physiological dysregulation increases with the number of biomarkers included, the value of additional markers diminishes as more are added and inclusion of 10-15 is generally sufficient. As long as enough markers are included, individual markers have little effect on the final metric, and even D(M)s calculated from mutually exclusive groups of markers correlate with each other at r~0.4-0.5. We also used data subsets to generate thousands of combinations of study populations and RPs to address sensitivity to differences in age range, sex, race, data set, sample size, and their interactions. Results were largely consistent (but not identical) regardless of the choice of RP; however, the signal was generally clearer with a younger and healthier RP, and RPs too different from the study population performed poorly. Accordingly, biomarker and RP choice are not particularly important in most cases, but caution should be used across very different populations or for fine-scale analyses. Biologically, the lack of sensitivity to marker choice and better performance of younger, healthier RPs confirm an interpretation of D(M) physiological dysregulation and as an emergent property of a complex system. Public Library of Science 2015-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4395377/ /pubmed/25875923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122541 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cohen, Alan A. Li, Qing Milot, Emmanuel Leroux, Maxime Faucher, Samuel Morissette-Thomas, Vincent Legault, Véronique Fried, Linda P. Ferrucci, Luigi Statistical Distance as a Measure of Physiological Dysregulation Is Largely Robust to Variation in Its Biomarker Composition |
title | Statistical Distance as a Measure of Physiological Dysregulation Is Largely Robust to Variation in Its Biomarker Composition |
title_full | Statistical Distance as a Measure of Physiological Dysregulation Is Largely Robust to Variation in Its Biomarker Composition |
title_fullStr | Statistical Distance as a Measure of Physiological Dysregulation Is Largely Robust to Variation in Its Biomarker Composition |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical Distance as a Measure of Physiological Dysregulation Is Largely Robust to Variation in Its Biomarker Composition |
title_short | Statistical Distance as a Measure of Physiological Dysregulation Is Largely Robust to Variation in Its Biomarker Composition |
title_sort | statistical distance as a measure of physiological dysregulation is largely robust to variation in its biomarker composition |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122541 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cohenalana statisticaldistanceasameasureofphysiologicaldysregulationislargelyrobusttovariationinitsbiomarkercomposition AT liqing statisticaldistanceasameasureofphysiologicaldysregulationislargelyrobusttovariationinitsbiomarkercomposition AT milotemmanuel statisticaldistanceasameasureofphysiologicaldysregulationislargelyrobusttovariationinitsbiomarkercomposition AT lerouxmaxime statisticaldistanceasameasureofphysiologicaldysregulationislargelyrobusttovariationinitsbiomarkercomposition AT fauchersamuel statisticaldistanceasameasureofphysiologicaldysregulationislargelyrobusttovariationinitsbiomarkercomposition AT morissettethomasvincent statisticaldistanceasameasureofphysiologicaldysregulationislargelyrobusttovariationinitsbiomarkercomposition AT legaultveronique statisticaldistanceasameasureofphysiologicaldysregulationislargelyrobusttovariationinitsbiomarkercomposition AT friedlindap statisticaldistanceasameasureofphysiologicaldysregulationislargelyrobusttovariationinitsbiomarkercomposition AT ferrucciluigi statisticaldistanceasameasureofphysiologicaldysregulationislargelyrobusttovariationinitsbiomarkercomposition |