Cargando…

The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to use surface electromyography (EMG) to investigate the effects of different foot positioning on bilateral erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) activation during sit-to-stand performed by individuals with stroke. [Subjects] Fifteen randomly selected parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nam, Inkyeong, Shin, Jin, Lee, Yoseb, Lee, Mi Young, Chung, Yijung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25931683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.571
_version_ 1782366472051359744
author Nam, Inkyeong
Shin, Jin
Lee, Yoseb
Lee, Mi Young
Chung, Yijung
author_facet Nam, Inkyeong
Shin, Jin
Lee, Yoseb
Lee, Mi Young
Chung, Yijung
author_sort Nam, Inkyeong
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The aim of this study was to use surface electromyography (EMG) to investigate the effects of different foot positioning on bilateral erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) activation during sit-to-stand performed by individuals with stroke. [Subjects] Fifteen randomly selected participants with stroke were enrolled in this study. [Methods] All the participants were asked to perform sit-to-stand (STS) using three different strategies: (1) symmetric foot position, (2) unaffected foot placed behind the affected foot position (asymmetric-1), (3) affected foot placed behind the unaffected foot position (asymmetric-2). An EMG system was used to measure ES and GM muscle activities. The strategies were performed in a random order, and the mean values of five measurements were used in the analysis. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to determine the statistical significance of differences between the conditions. [Results] The affected ES muscle activity was significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4) than in symmetrical foot placement (149.8±54.2). In addition, the affected ES, unaffected ES, and affected GM muscle activity were significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4, 173.5±83.1, 98.3±90.3 respectively) than in asymmetric-1 foot placement (147.3±53.8, 151.2±76.5, 84.9±73.8 respectively). [Conclusion] Our results suggest that it may be more desirable for persons with stroke to place the affected foot behind the unaffected foot when performing STS to increase affected ES and GM muscle activation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4395667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43956672015-04-30 The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients Nam, Inkyeong Shin, Jin Lee, Yoseb Lee, Mi Young Chung, Yijung J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The aim of this study was to use surface electromyography (EMG) to investigate the effects of different foot positioning on bilateral erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) activation during sit-to-stand performed by individuals with stroke. [Subjects] Fifteen randomly selected participants with stroke were enrolled in this study. [Methods] All the participants were asked to perform sit-to-stand (STS) using three different strategies: (1) symmetric foot position, (2) unaffected foot placed behind the affected foot position (asymmetric-1), (3) affected foot placed behind the unaffected foot position (asymmetric-2). An EMG system was used to measure ES and GM muscle activities. The strategies were performed in a random order, and the mean values of five measurements were used in the analysis. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to determine the statistical significance of differences between the conditions. [Results] The affected ES muscle activity was significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4) than in symmetrical foot placement (149.8±54.2). In addition, the affected ES, unaffected ES, and affected GM muscle activity were significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4, 173.5±83.1, 98.3±90.3 respectively) than in asymmetric-1 foot placement (147.3±53.8, 151.2±76.5, 84.9±73.8 respectively). [Conclusion] Our results suggest that it may be more desirable for persons with stroke to place the affected foot behind the unaffected foot when performing STS to increase affected ES and GM muscle activation. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-03-31 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4395667/ /pubmed/25931683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.571 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nam, Inkyeong
Shin, Jin
Lee, Yoseb
Lee, Mi Young
Chung, Yijung
The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients
title The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients
title_full The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients
title_fullStr The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients
title_full_unstemmed The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients
title_short The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients
title_sort effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25931683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.571
work_keys_str_mv AT naminkyeong theeffectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients
AT shinjin theeffectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients
AT leeyoseb theeffectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients
AT leemiyoung theeffectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients
AT chungyijung theeffectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients
AT naminkyeong effectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients
AT shinjin effectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients
AT leeyoseb effectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients
AT leemiyoung effectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients
AT chungyijung effectoffootpositiononerectorspinaeandgluteusmaximusmuscleactivationduringsittostandperformedbychronicstrokepatients