Cargando…

Implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in Ohio

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is under-utilized in treating opioid addiction. Payers and providers both have substantial influence over the adoption and use of this medication to enhance recovery. Their views could provide insights into the barriers and facilitators in buprenorphine adoption. METHODS: W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molfenter, Todd, Sherbeck, Carol, Zehner, Mark, Quanbeck, Andy, McCarty, Dennis, Kim, Jee-Seon, Starr, Sandy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0009-2
_version_ 1782366504482766848
author Molfenter, Todd
Sherbeck, Carol
Zehner, Mark
Quanbeck, Andy
McCarty, Dennis
Kim, Jee-Seon
Starr, Sandy
author_facet Molfenter, Todd
Sherbeck, Carol
Zehner, Mark
Quanbeck, Andy
McCarty, Dennis
Kim, Jee-Seon
Starr, Sandy
author_sort Molfenter, Todd
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is under-utilized in treating opioid addiction. Payers and providers both have substantial influence over the adoption and use of this medication to enhance recovery. Their views could provide insights into the barriers and facilitators in buprenorphine adoption. METHODS: We conducted individual interviews with 18 Ohio county Alcohol, Drug Addiction, and Mental Health Services (ADAMHS) Boards (payers) and 36 addiction treatment centers (providers) to examine barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use. Transcripts were reviewed, coded, and qualitatively analyzed. First, we examined reasons that county boards supported buprenorphine use. A second analysis compared county boards and addiction treatment providers on perceived barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use. The final analysis compared county boards with low and high use of buprenorphine to determine how facilitators and barriers differed between those settings. RESULTS: County boards (payers) promoted buprenorphine use to improve clinical care, reduce opioid overdose deaths, and prepare providers for participation in integrated models of health care delivery with primary care clinics and hospitals. Providers and payers shared many of the same perceptions of facilitators and barriers to buprenorphine use. Common facilitators identified were knowledge of buprenorphine benefits, funds allocated to purchase buprenorphine, and support from the criminal justice system. Common barriers were negative attitudes toward use of agonist pharmacotherapy, payment environment, and physician prescribing capacity. County boards with low buprenorphine use rates cited negative attitudes toward use of agonist medication as a primary barrier. County boards with high rates of buprenorphine use dedicated funds to purchase buprenorphine in spite of concerns about limited physician prescribing capacity. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative analysis found that attitudes toward use of medication and medication funding environment play important roles in an organization’s decision to begin buprenorphine use and that physician availability influences an organization’s ability to expand buprenorphine use over time. Additional education, reimbursement support, and policy changes are needed to support buprenorphine adoption and use, along with a greater understanding of the roles payers, providers, and regulators play in the adoption of targeted practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4395880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43958802015-04-14 Implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in Ohio Molfenter, Todd Sherbeck, Carol Zehner, Mark Quanbeck, Andy McCarty, Dennis Kim, Jee-Seon Starr, Sandy Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is under-utilized in treating opioid addiction. Payers and providers both have substantial influence over the adoption and use of this medication to enhance recovery. Their views could provide insights into the barriers and facilitators in buprenorphine adoption. METHODS: We conducted individual interviews with 18 Ohio county Alcohol, Drug Addiction, and Mental Health Services (ADAMHS) Boards (payers) and 36 addiction treatment centers (providers) to examine barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use. Transcripts were reviewed, coded, and qualitatively analyzed. First, we examined reasons that county boards supported buprenorphine use. A second analysis compared county boards and addiction treatment providers on perceived barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use. The final analysis compared county boards with low and high use of buprenorphine to determine how facilitators and barriers differed between those settings. RESULTS: County boards (payers) promoted buprenorphine use to improve clinical care, reduce opioid overdose deaths, and prepare providers for participation in integrated models of health care delivery with primary care clinics and hospitals. Providers and payers shared many of the same perceptions of facilitators and barriers to buprenorphine use. Common facilitators identified were knowledge of buprenorphine benefits, funds allocated to purchase buprenorphine, and support from the criminal justice system. Common barriers were negative attitudes toward use of agonist pharmacotherapy, payment environment, and physician prescribing capacity. County boards with low buprenorphine use rates cited negative attitudes toward use of agonist medication as a primary barrier. County boards with high rates of buprenorphine use dedicated funds to purchase buprenorphine in spite of concerns about limited physician prescribing capacity. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative analysis found that attitudes toward use of medication and medication funding environment play important roles in an organization’s decision to begin buprenorphine use and that physician availability influences an organization’s ability to expand buprenorphine use over time. Additional education, reimbursement support, and policy changes are needed to support buprenorphine adoption and use, along with a greater understanding of the roles payers, providers, and regulators play in the adoption of targeted practices. BioMed Central 2015-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4395880/ /pubmed/25884206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0009-2 Text en © Molfenter et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Molfenter, Todd
Sherbeck, Carol
Zehner, Mark
Quanbeck, Andy
McCarty, Dennis
Kim, Jee-Seon
Starr, Sandy
Implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in Ohio
title Implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in Ohio
title_full Implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in Ohio
title_fullStr Implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in Ohio
title_full_unstemmed Implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in Ohio
title_short Implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in Ohio
title_sort implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in ohio
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0009-2
work_keys_str_mv AT molfentertodd implementingbuprenorphineinaddictiontreatmentpayerandproviderperspectivesinohio
AT sherbeckcarol implementingbuprenorphineinaddictiontreatmentpayerandproviderperspectivesinohio
AT zehnermark implementingbuprenorphineinaddictiontreatmentpayerandproviderperspectivesinohio
AT quanbeckandy implementingbuprenorphineinaddictiontreatmentpayerandproviderperspectivesinohio
AT mccartydennis implementingbuprenorphineinaddictiontreatmentpayerandproviderperspectivesinohio
AT kimjeeseon implementingbuprenorphineinaddictiontreatmentpayerandproviderperspectivesinohio
AT starrsandy implementingbuprenorphineinaddictiontreatmentpayerandproviderperspectivesinohio