Cargando…

Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Telephone triage represents one strategy to manage demand for face-to-face GP appointments in primary care. However, limited evidence exists of the challenges GP practices face in implementing telephone triage. We conducted a qualitative process evaluation alongside a UK-based cluster ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murdoch, Jamie, Varley, Anna, Fletcher, Emily, Britten, Nicky, Price, Linnie, Calitri, Raff, Green, Colin, Lattimer, Valerie, Richards, Suzanne H, Richards, David A, Salisbury, Chris, Taylor, Rod S, Campbell, John L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0263-4
_version_ 1782366506903928832
author Murdoch, Jamie
Varley, Anna
Fletcher, Emily
Britten, Nicky
Price, Linnie
Calitri, Raff
Green, Colin
Lattimer, Valerie
Richards, Suzanne H
Richards, David A
Salisbury, Chris
Taylor, Rod S
Campbell, John L
author_facet Murdoch, Jamie
Varley, Anna
Fletcher, Emily
Britten, Nicky
Price, Linnie
Calitri, Raff
Green, Colin
Lattimer, Valerie
Richards, Suzanne H
Richards, David A
Salisbury, Chris
Taylor, Rod S
Campbell, John L
author_sort Murdoch, Jamie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telephone triage represents one strategy to manage demand for face-to-face GP appointments in primary care. However, limited evidence exists of the challenges GP practices face in implementing telephone triage. We conducted a qualitative process evaluation alongside a UK-based cluster randomised trial (ESTEEM) which compared the impact of GP-led and nurse-led telephone triage with usual care on primary care workload, cost, patient experience, and safety for patients requesting a same-day GP consultation. The aim of the process study was to provide insights into the observed effects of the ESTEEM trial from the perspectives of staff and patients, and to specify the circumstances under which triage is likely to be successfully implemented. Here we report perspectives of staff. METHODS: The intervention comprised implementation of either GP-led or nurse-led telephone triage for a period of 2-3 months. A qualitative evaluation was conducted using staff interviews recruited from eight general practices (4 GP triage, 4 Nurse triage) in the UK, implementing triage as part of the ESTEEM trial. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with 44 staff members in GP triage and nurse triage practices (16 GPs, 8 nurses, 7 practice managers, 13 administrative staff). RESULTS: Staff reported diverse experiences and perceptions regarding the implementation of telephone triage, its effects on workload, and on the benefits of triage. Such diversity were explained by the different ways triage was organised, the staffing models used to support triage, how the introduction of triage was communicated across practice staff, and by how staff roles were reconfigured as a result of implementing triage. CONCLUSION: The findings from the process evaluation offer insight into the range of ways GP practices participating in ESTEEM implemented telephone triage, and the circumstances under which telephone triage can be successfully implemented beyond the context of a clinical trial. Staff experiences and perceptions of telephone triage are shaped by the way practices communicate with staff, prepare for and sustain the changes required to implement triage effectively, as well as by existing practice culture, and staff and patient behaviour arising in response to the changes made. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20687662. Registered 28 May 2009.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4395901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43959012015-04-14 Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial Murdoch, Jamie Varley, Anna Fletcher, Emily Britten, Nicky Price, Linnie Calitri, Raff Green, Colin Lattimer, Valerie Richards, Suzanne H Richards, David A Salisbury, Chris Taylor, Rod S Campbell, John L BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Telephone triage represents one strategy to manage demand for face-to-face GP appointments in primary care. However, limited evidence exists of the challenges GP practices face in implementing telephone triage. We conducted a qualitative process evaluation alongside a UK-based cluster randomised trial (ESTEEM) which compared the impact of GP-led and nurse-led telephone triage with usual care on primary care workload, cost, patient experience, and safety for patients requesting a same-day GP consultation. The aim of the process study was to provide insights into the observed effects of the ESTEEM trial from the perspectives of staff and patients, and to specify the circumstances under which triage is likely to be successfully implemented. Here we report perspectives of staff. METHODS: The intervention comprised implementation of either GP-led or nurse-led telephone triage for a period of 2-3 months. A qualitative evaluation was conducted using staff interviews recruited from eight general practices (4 GP triage, 4 Nurse triage) in the UK, implementing triage as part of the ESTEEM trial. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with 44 staff members in GP triage and nurse triage practices (16 GPs, 8 nurses, 7 practice managers, 13 administrative staff). RESULTS: Staff reported diverse experiences and perceptions regarding the implementation of telephone triage, its effects on workload, and on the benefits of triage. Such diversity were explained by the different ways triage was organised, the staffing models used to support triage, how the introduction of triage was communicated across practice staff, and by how staff roles were reconfigured as a result of implementing triage. CONCLUSION: The findings from the process evaluation offer insight into the range of ways GP practices participating in ESTEEM implemented telephone triage, and the circumstances under which telephone triage can be successfully implemented beyond the context of a clinical trial. Staff experiences and perceptions of telephone triage are shaped by the way practices communicate with staff, prepare for and sustain the changes required to implement triage effectively, as well as by existing practice culture, and staff and patient behaviour arising in response to the changes made. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20687662. Registered 28 May 2009. BioMed Central 2015-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4395901/ /pubmed/25887747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0263-4 Text en © Murdoch et al.; licensee Biomed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murdoch, Jamie
Varley, Anna
Fletcher, Emily
Britten, Nicky
Price, Linnie
Calitri, Raff
Green, Colin
Lattimer, Valerie
Richards, Suzanne H
Richards, David A
Salisbury, Chris
Taylor, Rod S
Campbell, John L
Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort implementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0263-4
work_keys_str_mv AT murdochjamie implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT varleyanna implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fletcheremily implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brittennicky implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pricelinnie implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT calitriraff implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT greencolin implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lattimervalerie implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT richardssuzanneh implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT richardsdavida implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT salisburychris implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT taylorrods implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT campbelljohnl implementingtelephonetriageingeneralpracticeaprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial