Cargando…

Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey

BACKGROUND: Advancements in genomic testing have led to the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with prostate cancer. The clinical utility of SNP tests to evaluate prostate cancer risk is unclear. Studies have not examined predictors of interest in novel genomic SNP t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Michael J, Ruth, Karen J, Chen, David YT, Gross, Laura M, Giri, Veda N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-015-0032-3
_version_ 1782366545818681344
author Hall, Michael J
Ruth, Karen J
Chen, David YT
Gross, Laura M
Giri, Veda N
author_facet Hall, Michael J
Ruth, Karen J
Chen, David YT
Gross, Laura M
Giri, Veda N
author_sort Hall, Michael J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advancements in genomic testing have led to the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with prostate cancer. The clinical utility of SNP tests to evaluate prostate cancer risk is unclear. Studies have not examined predictors of interest in novel genomic SNP tests for prostate cancer risk in a diverse population. METHODS: Consecutive participants in the Fox Chase Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program (PRAP) (n = 40) and unselected men from surgical urology clinics (n = 40) completed a one-time survey. Items examined interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk, knowledge, impact of unsolicited findings, and psychosocial factors including health literacy. RESULTS: Knowledge of genomic SNP tests was low in both groups, but interest was higher among PRAP men (p < 0.001). The prospect of receiving unsolicited results about ancestral genomic markers increased interest in testing in both groups. Multivariable modeling identified several predictors of higher interest in a genomic SNP test including higher perceived risk (p = 0.025), indicating zero reasons for not wanting testing (vs ≥1 reason) (p = 0.013), and higher health literacy (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of genomic SNP testing was low in this sample, but higher among high-risk men. High-risk status may increase interest in novel genomic tests, while low literacy may lessen interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4396119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43961192015-04-14 Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey Hall, Michael J Ruth, Karen J Chen, David YT Gross, Laura M Giri, Veda N Hered Cancer Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: Advancements in genomic testing have led to the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with prostate cancer. The clinical utility of SNP tests to evaluate prostate cancer risk is unclear. Studies have not examined predictors of interest in novel genomic SNP tests for prostate cancer risk in a diverse population. METHODS: Consecutive participants in the Fox Chase Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program (PRAP) (n = 40) and unselected men from surgical urology clinics (n = 40) completed a one-time survey. Items examined interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk, knowledge, impact of unsolicited findings, and psychosocial factors including health literacy. RESULTS: Knowledge of genomic SNP tests was low in both groups, but interest was higher among PRAP men (p < 0.001). The prospect of receiving unsolicited results about ancestral genomic markers increased interest in testing in both groups. Multivariable modeling identified several predictors of higher interest in a genomic SNP test including higher perceived risk (p = 0.025), indicating zero reasons for not wanting testing (vs ≥1 reason) (p = 0.013), and higher health literacy (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of genomic SNP testing was low in this sample, but higher among high-risk men. High-risk status may increase interest in novel genomic tests, while low literacy may lessen interest. BioMed Central 2015-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4396119/ /pubmed/25874018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-015-0032-3 Text en © Hall et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hall, Michael J
Ruth, Karen J
Chen, David YT
Gross, Laura M
Giri, Veda N
Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey
title Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey
title_full Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey
title_fullStr Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey
title_full_unstemmed Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey
title_short Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey
title_sort interest in genomic snp testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-015-0032-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hallmichaelj interestingenomicsnptestingforprostatecancerriskapilotsurvey
AT ruthkarenj interestingenomicsnptestingforprostatecancerriskapilotsurvey
AT chendavidyt interestingenomicsnptestingforprostatecancerriskapilotsurvey
AT grosslauram interestingenomicsnptestingforprostatecancerriskapilotsurvey
AT girivedan interestingenomicsnptestingforprostatecancerriskapilotsurvey