Cargando…

Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common single gene cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Caused by a silenced fragile X mental retardation 1 gene and the subsequent deficiency in fragile X mental retardation protein, patients with FXS experience a range of physical, beh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaefer, Tori L, Davenport, Matthew H, Erickson, Craig A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25897255
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S35673
_version_ 1782366577748869120
author Schaefer, Tori L
Davenport, Matthew H
Erickson, Craig A
author_facet Schaefer, Tori L
Davenport, Matthew H
Erickson, Craig A
author_sort Schaefer, Tori L
collection PubMed
description Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common single gene cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Caused by a silenced fragile X mental retardation 1 gene and the subsequent deficiency in fragile X mental retardation protein, patients with FXS experience a range of physical, behavioral, and intellectual debilitations. The FXS field, as a whole, has recently met with some challenges, as several targeted clinical trials with high expectations of success have failed to elucidate significant improvements in a variety of symptom domains. As new clinical trials in FXS are planned, there has been much discussion about the use of the commonly used clinical outcome measures, as well as study design considerations, patient stratification, and optimal age range for treatment. The evidence that modification of these drug targets and use of these failed compounds would prove to be efficacious in human clinical study were rooted in years of basic and translational research. There are questions arising as to the use of the mouse models for studying FXS treatment development. This issue is twofold: many of the symptom domains and molecular and biochemical changes assessed and indicative of efficacy in mouse model study are not easily amenable to clinical trials in people with FXS because of the intolerability of the testing paradigm or a lack of noninvasive techniques (prepulse inhibition, sensory hypersensitivity, startle reactivity, or electrophysiologic, biochemical, or structural changes in the brain); and capturing subtle yet meaningful changes in symptom domains such as sociability, anxiety, and hyperactivity in human FXS clinical trials is challenging with the currently used measures (typically parent/caregiver rating scales). Clinicians, researchers, and the pharmaceutical industry have all had to take a step back and critically evaluate the way we think about how to best optimize future investigations into pharmacologic FXS treatments. As new clinical trials are coming down the drug discovery pipeline, it is clear that the field is moving in a direction that values the development of molecular biomarkers, less subjective quantitative measures of symptom improvement, and rating scales developed specifically for use in FXS in conjunction with drug safety. While summarizing preclinical evidence, where applicable, and discussing challenges in FXS treatment development, this review details both completed clinical trials for the targeted and symptomatic treatment of FXS and introduces novel projects on the cusp of clinical trial investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4396424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43964242015-04-20 Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome Schaefer, Tori L Davenport, Matthew H Erickson, Craig A Appl Clin Genet Review Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common single gene cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Caused by a silenced fragile X mental retardation 1 gene and the subsequent deficiency in fragile X mental retardation protein, patients with FXS experience a range of physical, behavioral, and intellectual debilitations. The FXS field, as a whole, has recently met with some challenges, as several targeted clinical trials with high expectations of success have failed to elucidate significant improvements in a variety of symptom domains. As new clinical trials in FXS are planned, there has been much discussion about the use of the commonly used clinical outcome measures, as well as study design considerations, patient stratification, and optimal age range for treatment. The evidence that modification of these drug targets and use of these failed compounds would prove to be efficacious in human clinical study were rooted in years of basic and translational research. There are questions arising as to the use of the mouse models for studying FXS treatment development. This issue is twofold: many of the symptom domains and molecular and biochemical changes assessed and indicative of efficacy in mouse model study are not easily amenable to clinical trials in people with FXS because of the intolerability of the testing paradigm or a lack of noninvasive techniques (prepulse inhibition, sensory hypersensitivity, startle reactivity, or electrophysiologic, biochemical, or structural changes in the brain); and capturing subtle yet meaningful changes in symptom domains such as sociability, anxiety, and hyperactivity in human FXS clinical trials is challenging with the currently used measures (typically parent/caregiver rating scales). Clinicians, researchers, and the pharmaceutical industry have all had to take a step back and critically evaluate the way we think about how to best optimize future investigations into pharmacologic FXS treatments. As new clinical trials are coming down the drug discovery pipeline, it is clear that the field is moving in a direction that values the development of molecular biomarkers, less subjective quantitative measures of symptom improvement, and rating scales developed specifically for use in FXS in conjunction with drug safety. While summarizing preclinical evidence, where applicable, and discussing challenges in FXS treatment development, this review details both completed clinical trials for the targeted and symptomatic treatment of FXS and introduces novel projects on the cusp of clinical trial investigation. Dove Medical Press 2015-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4396424/ /pubmed/25897255 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S35673 Text en © 2015 Schaefer et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Schaefer, Tori L
Davenport, Matthew H
Erickson, Craig A
Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome
title Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome
title_full Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome
title_fullStr Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome
title_short Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome
title_sort emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile x syndrome
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25897255
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S35673
work_keys_str_mv AT schaefertoril emergingpharmacologictreatmentoptionsforfragilexsyndrome
AT davenportmatthewh emergingpharmacologictreatmentoptionsforfragilexsyndrome
AT ericksoncraiga emergingpharmacologictreatmentoptionsforfragilexsyndrome