Cargando…
[Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation
In much of neuroimaging and neuropsychology, regions of the brain have been associated with ‘lexical representation’, with little consideration as to what this cognitive construct actually denotes. Within current computational models of word recognition, there are a number of different approaches to...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25893204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1005637 |
_version_ | 1782366586556907520 |
---|---|
author | Woollams, Anna M. |
author_facet | Woollams, Anna M. |
author_sort | Woollams, Anna M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In much of neuroimaging and neuropsychology, regions of the brain have been associated with ‘lexical representation’, with little consideration as to what this cognitive construct actually denotes. Within current computational models of word recognition, there are a number of different approaches to the representation of lexical knowledge. Structural lexical representations, found in original theories of word recognition, have been instantiated in modern localist models. However, such a representational scheme lacks neural plausibility in terms of economy and flexibility. Connectionist models have therefore adopted distributed representations of form and meaning. Semantic representations in connectionist models necessarily encode lexical knowledge. Yet when equipped with recurrent connections, connectionist models can also develop attractors for familiar forms that function as lexical representations. Current behavioural, neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence shows a clear role for semantic information, but also suggests some modality- and task-specific lexical representations. A variety of connectionist architectures could implement these distributed functional representations, and further experimental and simulation work is required to discriminate between these alternatives. Future conceptualisations of lexical representations will therefore emerge from a synergy between modelling and neuroscience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4396497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43964972015-04-16 [Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation Woollams, Anna M. Lang Cogn Neurosci Special Section: Representing mental representations: Neuroscientific and computational approaches to information processing in the brain In much of neuroimaging and neuropsychology, regions of the brain have been associated with ‘lexical representation’, with little consideration as to what this cognitive construct actually denotes. Within current computational models of word recognition, there are a number of different approaches to the representation of lexical knowledge. Structural lexical representations, found in original theories of word recognition, have been instantiated in modern localist models. However, such a representational scheme lacks neural plausibility in terms of economy and flexibility. Connectionist models have therefore adopted distributed representations of form and meaning. Semantic representations in connectionist models necessarily encode lexical knowledge. Yet when equipped with recurrent connections, connectionist models can also develop attractors for familiar forms that function as lexical representations. Current behavioural, neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence shows a clear role for semantic information, but also suggests some modality- and task-specific lexical representations. A variety of connectionist architectures could implement these distributed functional representations, and further experimental and simulation work is required to discriminate between these alternatives. Future conceptualisations of lexical representations will therefore emerge from a synergy between modelling and neuroscience. Routledge 2015-04-21 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4396497/ /pubmed/25893204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1005637 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Section: Representing mental representations: Neuroscientific and computational approaches to information processing in the brain Woollams, Anna M. [Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation |
title |
[Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation |
title_full |
[Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation |
title_fullStr |
[Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation |
title_full_unstemmed |
[Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation |
title_short |
[Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation |
title_sort | [image: see text] lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation |
topic | Special Section: Representing mental representations: Neuroscientific and computational approaches to information processing in the brain |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25893204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1005637 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woollamsannam imageseetextlexicalisaslexicaldoescomputationalapproachestolexicalrepresentation |