Cargando…

[Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation

In much of neuroimaging and neuropsychology, regions of the brain have been associated with ‘lexical representation’, with little consideration as to what this cognitive construct actually denotes. Within current computational models of word recognition, there are a number of different approaches to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Woollams, Anna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25893204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1005637
_version_ 1782366586556907520
author Woollams, Anna M.
author_facet Woollams, Anna M.
author_sort Woollams, Anna M.
collection PubMed
description In much of neuroimaging and neuropsychology, regions of the brain have been associated with ‘lexical representation’, with little consideration as to what this cognitive construct actually denotes. Within current computational models of word recognition, there are a number of different approaches to the representation of lexical knowledge. Structural lexical representations, found in original theories of word recognition, have been instantiated in modern localist models. However, such a representational scheme lacks neural plausibility in terms of economy and flexibility. Connectionist models have therefore adopted distributed representations of form and meaning. Semantic representations in connectionist models necessarily encode lexical knowledge. Yet when equipped with recurrent connections, connectionist models can also develop attractors for familiar forms that function as lexical representations. Current behavioural, neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence shows a clear role for semantic information, but also suggests some modality- and task-specific lexical representations. A variety of connectionist architectures could implement these distributed functional representations, and further experimental and simulation work is required to discriminate between these alternatives. Future conceptualisations of lexical representations will therefore emerge from a synergy between modelling and neuroscience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4396497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43964972015-04-16 [Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation Woollams, Anna M. Lang Cogn Neurosci Special Section: Representing mental representations: Neuroscientific and computational approaches to information processing in the brain In much of neuroimaging and neuropsychology, regions of the brain have been associated with ‘lexical representation’, with little consideration as to what this cognitive construct actually denotes. Within current computational models of word recognition, there are a number of different approaches to the representation of lexical knowledge. Structural lexical representations, found in original theories of word recognition, have been instantiated in modern localist models. However, such a representational scheme lacks neural plausibility in terms of economy and flexibility. Connectionist models have therefore adopted distributed representations of form and meaning. Semantic representations in connectionist models necessarily encode lexical knowledge. Yet when equipped with recurrent connections, connectionist models can also develop attractors for familiar forms that function as lexical representations. Current behavioural, neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence shows a clear role for semantic information, but also suggests some modality- and task-specific lexical representations. A variety of connectionist architectures could implement these distributed functional representations, and further experimental and simulation work is required to discriminate between these alternatives. Future conceptualisations of lexical representations will therefore emerge from a synergy between modelling and neuroscience. Routledge 2015-04-21 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4396497/ /pubmed/25893204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1005637 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Section: Representing mental representations: Neuroscientific and computational approaches to information processing in the brain
Woollams, Anna M.
[Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation
title [Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation
title_full [Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation
title_fullStr [Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation
title_full_unstemmed [Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation
title_short [Image: see text] Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation
title_sort [image: see text] lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation
topic Special Section: Representing mental representations: Neuroscientific and computational approaches to information processing in the brain
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25893204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1005637
work_keys_str_mv AT woollamsannam imageseetextlexicalisaslexicaldoescomputationalapproachestolexicalrepresentation