Cargando…

Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception

INTRODUCTION: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cappello, Leonardo, Elangovan, Naveen, Contu, Sara, Khosravani, Sanaz, Konczak, Jürgen, Masia, Lorenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25926785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198
_version_ 1782366590202806272
author Cappello, Leonardo
Elangovan, Naveen
Contu, Sara
Khosravani, Sanaz
Konczak, Jürgen
Masia, Lorenzo
author_facet Cappello, Leonardo
Elangovan, Naveen
Contu, Sara
Khosravani, Sanaz
Konczak, Jürgen
Masia, Lorenzo
author_sort Cappello, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabilitation enabled the use of such devices for the assessment of proprioceptive function. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility of a wrist robot system to determine proprioceptive discrimination thresholds for two different DoFs of the wrist. Specifically, we sought to accomplish three aims: first, to establish data validity; second, to show that the system is sensitive to detect small differences in acuity; third, to establish test–retest reliability over repeated testing. METHODOLOGY: Eleven healthy adult subjects experienced two passive wrist movements and had to verbally indicate which movement had the larger amplitude. Based on a subject’s response data, a psychometric function was fitted and the wrist acuity threshold was established at the 75% correct response level. A subset of five subjects repeated the experimentation three times (T1, T2, and T3) to determine the test–retest reliability. RESULTS: Mean threshold for wrist flexion was 2.15°± 0.43° and 1.52°± 0.36° for abduction. Encoder resolutions were 0.0075°(flexion–extension) and 0.0032°(abduction–adduction). Motor resolutions were 0.2°(flexion–extension) and 0.3°(abduction–adduction). Reliability coefficients were r(T2-T1) = 0.986 and r(T3-T2) = 0.971. CONCLUSION: We currently lack established norm data on the proprioceptive acuity of the wrist to establish direct validity. However, the magnitude of our reported thresholds is physiological, plausible, and well in line with available threshold data obtained at the elbow joint. Moreover, system has high resolution and is sensitive enough to detect small differences in acuity. Finally, the system produces reliable data over repeated testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4396514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43965142015-04-29 Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception Cappello, Leonardo Elangovan, Naveen Contu, Sara Khosravani, Sanaz Konczak, Jürgen Masia, Lorenzo Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabilitation enabled the use of such devices for the assessment of proprioceptive function. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility of a wrist robot system to determine proprioceptive discrimination thresholds for two different DoFs of the wrist. Specifically, we sought to accomplish three aims: first, to establish data validity; second, to show that the system is sensitive to detect small differences in acuity; third, to establish test–retest reliability over repeated testing. METHODOLOGY: Eleven healthy adult subjects experienced two passive wrist movements and had to verbally indicate which movement had the larger amplitude. Based on a subject’s response data, a psychometric function was fitted and the wrist acuity threshold was established at the 75% correct response level. A subset of five subjects repeated the experimentation three times (T1, T2, and T3) to determine the test–retest reliability. RESULTS: Mean threshold for wrist flexion was 2.15°± 0.43° and 1.52°± 0.36° for abduction. Encoder resolutions were 0.0075°(flexion–extension) and 0.0032°(abduction–adduction). Motor resolutions were 0.2°(flexion–extension) and 0.3°(abduction–adduction). Reliability coefficients were r(T2-T1) = 0.986 and r(T3-T2) = 0.971. CONCLUSION: We currently lack established norm data on the proprioceptive acuity of the wrist to establish direct validity. However, the magnitude of our reported thresholds is physiological, plausible, and well in line with available threshold data obtained at the elbow joint. Moreover, system has high resolution and is sensitive enough to detect small differences in acuity. Finally, the system produces reliable data over repeated testing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4396514/ /pubmed/25926785 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cappello, Elangovan, Contu, Khosravani, Konczak and Masia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Cappello, Leonardo
Elangovan, Naveen
Contu, Sara
Khosravani, Sanaz
Konczak, Jürgen
Masia, Lorenzo
Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception
title Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception
title_full Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception
title_fullStr Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception
title_full_unstemmed Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception
title_short Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception
title_sort robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25926785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198
work_keys_str_mv AT cappelloleonardo robotaidedassessmentofwristproprioception
AT elangovannaveen robotaidedassessmentofwristproprioception
AT contusara robotaidedassessmentofwristproprioception
AT khosravanisanaz robotaidedassessmentofwristproprioception
AT konczakjurgen robotaidedassessmentofwristproprioception
AT masialorenzo robotaidedassessmentofwristproprioception