Cargando…

Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) was developed in Sweden in 2010 and validated in 920 primiparous women. It has not been validated in the United Kingdom (UK). Measuring the impact of an intervention on a woman’s childbirth experience is arguably as important as measuring its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Kate F, Wilson, Philippa, Bugg, George J, Dencker, Anna, Thornton, Jim G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0513-4
_version_ 1782366607804203008
author Walker, Kate F
Wilson, Philippa
Bugg, George J
Dencker, Anna
Thornton, Jim G
author_facet Walker, Kate F
Wilson, Philippa
Bugg, George J
Dencker, Anna
Thornton, Jim G
author_sort Walker, Kate F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) was developed in Sweden in 2010 and validated in 920 primiparous women. It has not been validated in the United Kingdom (UK). Measuring the impact of an intervention on a woman’s childbirth experience is arguably as important as measuring its impact on outcomes such as caesarean delivery and perinatal morbidity or mortality and yet surprisingly it is rarely done. The lack of a robust validated tool for evaluating labour experience in the UK is a topical issue in the UK at present. Indeed NICE say ‘A standardised method to measure and quantify women's psychological and emotional wellbeing and their birth experiences is urgently required to support any study investigating the effectiveness of interventions, techniques or strategies during birth.’ METHODS: The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire and part of the Care Quality Commission Maternity Survey (2010) was sent to 350 women at one month postnatal. The CEQ was sent again two weeks later. The CEQ was tested for face validity among 25 postnatal mothers. Demographic data and delivery data was used to establish construct validity of the CEQ using the method of known-groups validation. The results of the scored CEQ sent out twice were used to measure test-retest reliability of the CEQ by calculating the quadratic weighted index of agreement between the two scores. Criterion validity was measured by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient for the CEQ and Maternity Survey scores. RESULTS: Face validity of the CEQ in a UK population was demonstrated with all respondents stating it was easy to understand and complete. A statistically significantly higher CEQ score for subgroups of women known to report a better birth outcome demonstrated construct validity of the CEQ. A weighted kappa of 0.68 demonstrated test-retest reliability of the CEQ. A Pearson correlation co-efficient of 0.73 demonstrated a strong correlation between the results of the CEQ and the results of the ‘gold standard’ assessment of childbirth experience in the UK: the Maternity Survey and hence criterion validity of the CEQ. CONCLUSIONS: The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of childbirth experience in the UK population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4396591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43965912015-04-15 Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom Walker, Kate F Wilson, Philippa Bugg, George J Dencker, Anna Thornton, Jim G BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) was developed in Sweden in 2010 and validated in 920 primiparous women. It has not been validated in the United Kingdom (UK). Measuring the impact of an intervention on a woman’s childbirth experience is arguably as important as measuring its impact on outcomes such as caesarean delivery and perinatal morbidity or mortality and yet surprisingly it is rarely done. The lack of a robust validated tool for evaluating labour experience in the UK is a topical issue in the UK at present. Indeed NICE say ‘A standardised method to measure and quantify women's psychological and emotional wellbeing and their birth experiences is urgently required to support any study investigating the effectiveness of interventions, techniques or strategies during birth.’ METHODS: The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire and part of the Care Quality Commission Maternity Survey (2010) was sent to 350 women at one month postnatal. The CEQ was sent again two weeks later. The CEQ was tested for face validity among 25 postnatal mothers. Demographic data and delivery data was used to establish construct validity of the CEQ using the method of known-groups validation. The results of the scored CEQ sent out twice were used to measure test-retest reliability of the CEQ by calculating the quadratic weighted index of agreement between the two scores. Criterion validity was measured by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient for the CEQ and Maternity Survey scores. RESULTS: Face validity of the CEQ in a UK population was demonstrated with all respondents stating it was easy to understand and complete. A statistically significantly higher CEQ score for subgroups of women known to report a better birth outcome demonstrated construct validity of the CEQ. A weighted kappa of 0.68 demonstrated test-retest reliability of the CEQ. A Pearson correlation co-efficient of 0.73 demonstrated a strong correlation between the results of the CEQ and the results of the ‘gold standard’ assessment of childbirth experience in the UK: the Maternity Survey and hence criterion validity of the CEQ. CONCLUSIONS: The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of childbirth experience in the UK population. BioMed Central 2015-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4396591/ /pubmed/25884191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0513-4 Text en © Walker et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Walker, Kate F
Wilson, Philippa
Bugg, George J
Dencker, Anna
Thornton, Jim G
Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom
title Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_full Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_short Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_sort childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the united kingdom
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0513-4
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerkatef childbirthexperiencequestionnairevalidatingitsuseintheunitedkingdom
AT wilsonphilippa childbirthexperiencequestionnairevalidatingitsuseintheunitedkingdom
AT bugggeorgej childbirthexperiencequestionnairevalidatingitsuseintheunitedkingdom
AT denckeranna childbirthexperiencequestionnairevalidatingitsuseintheunitedkingdom
AT thorntonjimg childbirthexperiencequestionnairevalidatingitsuseintheunitedkingdom