Cargando…

Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer correlates with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. Generally, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers have favorable prognosis. In order to understand the exact clinical characteristics and prognosis of sing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bae, Soo Youn, Kim, Sangmin, Lee, Jun Ho, Lee, Hyun-chul, Lee, Se Kyung, Kil, Won Ho, Kim, Seok Won, Lee, Jeong Eon, Nam, Seok Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1121-4
_version_ 1782366621047717888
author Bae, Soo Youn
Kim, Sangmin
Lee, Jun Ho
Lee, Hyun-chul
Lee, Se Kyung
Kil, Won Ho
Kim, Seok Won
Lee, Jeong Eon
Nam, Seok Jin
author_facet Bae, Soo Youn
Kim, Sangmin
Lee, Jun Ho
Lee, Hyun-chul
Lee, Se Kyung
Kil, Won Ho
Kim, Seok Won
Lee, Jeong Eon
Nam, Seok Jin
author_sort Bae, Soo Youn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer correlates with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. Generally, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers have favorable prognosis. In order to understand the exact clinical characteristics and prognosis of single HR-positive breast cancer (ER + PR- tumors and ER-PR+ tumors), we compared these tumors to double HR+ tumors as well as HR- negative tumors (ER-PR-). METHODS: We examined the clinical and biological features of 6,980 women with invasive ductal carcinoma, and these patients were stratified according to ER and PR expression as double HR+ (ER + PR+), single HR+ (ER + PR- and ER-PR+) and double HR-negative (HR-, ER-PR-) tumors. RESULTS: In this study, 571 (8.2%) cases were single HR+ tumors, of which 90 (1.3%) were ER-PR+ tumors and 481 (6.9%) were ER + PR- tumors. Our multivariate analysis showed that in patients without HER2 overexpression ER + PR- tumors were associated with an increased risk of recurrence and death compared with ER + PR+ tumors, with a hazard ratio of 2.12 for disease-free survival (DFS) and 4.79 for overall survival (OS). In patients without HER2 overexpression ER-PR+ tumors had increased risk of recurrence and death compared with ER + PR+ tumor, with a hazard ratio of 4.19 for DFS and 7.22 for OS. In contrast, in patients with HER2 overexpression, the difference in survival between single HR+ tumors and double HR+ HR- tumors was not statistically significant. In patients without HER2 overexpression the DFS and OS of ER + PR- and ER-PR+ tumors were not significantly different from those of ER-PR- tumors. CONCLUSION: We have identified clinically and biologically distinct features of single HR+ tumors (ER–PR+ and ER + PR–) through comparison with both ER + PR+ and ER-PR- tumors. These differences were only significant in HER2- tumors, not in HER2+ tumors. Single HR+ tumors without HER2 overexpression (ER + PR-HER2- or ER-PR + HER2-) were associated with poorer survival than ER + PR + HER2- tumors, and had comparable poor survival to ER-PR-HER2- tumors (triple-negative breast cancer). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4396721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43967212015-04-15 Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer Bae, Soo Youn Kim, Sangmin Lee, Jun Ho Lee, Hyun-chul Lee, Se Kyung Kil, Won Ho Kim, Seok Won Lee, Jeong Eon Nam, Seok Jin BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer correlates with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. Generally, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers have favorable prognosis. In order to understand the exact clinical characteristics and prognosis of single HR-positive breast cancer (ER + PR- tumors and ER-PR+ tumors), we compared these tumors to double HR+ tumors as well as HR- negative tumors (ER-PR-). METHODS: We examined the clinical and biological features of 6,980 women with invasive ductal carcinoma, and these patients were stratified according to ER and PR expression as double HR+ (ER + PR+), single HR+ (ER + PR- and ER-PR+) and double HR-negative (HR-, ER-PR-) tumors. RESULTS: In this study, 571 (8.2%) cases were single HR+ tumors, of which 90 (1.3%) were ER-PR+ tumors and 481 (6.9%) were ER + PR- tumors. Our multivariate analysis showed that in patients without HER2 overexpression ER + PR- tumors were associated with an increased risk of recurrence and death compared with ER + PR+ tumors, with a hazard ratio of 2.12 for disease-free survival (DFS) and 4.79 for overall survival (OS). In patients without HER2 overexpression ER-PR+ tumors had increased risk of recurrence and death compared with ER + PR+ tumor, with a hazard ratio of 4.19 for DFS and 7.22 for OS. In contrast, in patients with HER2 overexpression, the difference in survival between single HR+ tumors and double HR+ HR- tumors was not statistically significant. In patients without HER2 overexpression the DFS and OS of ER + PR- and ER-PR+ tumors were not significantly different from those of ER-PR- tumors. CONCLUSION: We have identified clinically and biologically distinct features of single HR+ tumors (ER–PR+ and ER + PR–) through comparison with both ER + PR+ and ER-PR- tumors. These differences were only significant in HER2- tumors, not in HER2+ tumors. Single HR+ tumors without HER2 overexpression (ER + PR-HER2- or ER-PR + HER2-) were associated with poorer survival than ER + PR + HER2- tumors, and had comparable poor survival to ER-PR-HER2- tumors (triple-negative breast cancer). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4396721/ /pubmed/25880075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1121-4 Text en © Bae et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bae, Soo Youn
Kim, Sangmin
Lee, Jun Ho
Lee, Hyun-chul
Lee, Se Kyung
Kil, Won Ho
Kim, Seok Won
Lee, Jeong Eon
Nam, Seok Jin
Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer
title Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer
title_full Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer
title_fullStr Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer
title_short Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer
title_sort poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1121-4
work_keys_str_mv AT baesooyoun poorprognosisofsinglehormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersimilaroutcomeastriplenegativebreastcancer
AT kimsangmin poorprognosisofsinglehormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersimilaroutcomeastriplenegativebreastcancer
AT leejunho poorprognosisofsinglehormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersimilaroutcomeastriplenegativebreastcancer
AT leehyunchul poorprognosisofsinglehormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersimilaroutcomeastriplenegativebreastcancer
AT leesekyung poorprognosisofsinglehormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersimilaroutcomeastriplenegativebreastcancer
AT kilwonho poorprognosisofsinglehormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersimilaroutcomeastriplenegativebreastcancer
AT kimseokwon poorprognosisofsinglehormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersimilaroutcomeastriplenegativebreastcancer
AT leejeongeon poorprognosisofsinglehormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersimilaroutcomeastriplenegativebreastcancer
AT namseokjin poorprognosisofsinglehormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersimilaroutcomeastriplenegativebreastcancer