Cargando…

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest

The objective of the present study was to assess cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness (GT) and distance between gingival margin and vestibular (GMBC-V) and interproximal bone crests (GMBC-I). GT and GMBC-V were measured in 348 teeth and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borges, Germana Jayme, Ruiz, Luis Fernando Naldi, de Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves, Porto, Olavo César Lyra, Estrela, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25918737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/142108
_version_ 1782366621501751296
author Borges, Germana Jayme
Ruiz, Luis Fernando Naldi
de Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves
Porto, Olavo César Lyra
Estrela, Carlos
author_facet Borges, Germana Jayme
Ruiz, Luis Fernando Naldi
de Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves
Porto, Olavo César Lyra
Estrela, Carlos
author_sort Borges, Germana Jayme
collection PubMed
description The objective of the present study was to assess cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness (GT) and distance between gingival margin and vestibular (GMBC-V) and interproximal bone crests (GMBC-I). GT and GMBC-V were measured in 348 teeth and GMBC-I was measured in 377 tooth regions of 29 patients with gummy smile. GT was assessed using transgingival probing (TP), ultrasound (US), and CBCT, whereas GMBC-V and GMBC-I were assessed by transsurgical clinical evaluation (TCE) and CBCT. Statistical analyses used independent t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and simple linear regression. Difference was observed for GT: between TP, CBCT, and US considering all teeth; between TP and CBCT and between TP and US in incisors and canines; between TP and US in premolars and first molars. TP presented the highest means for GT. Positive correlation and linear regression were observed between TP and CBCT, TP and US, and CBCT and US. Difference was observed for GMBC-V and GMBC-I using TCE and CBCT, considering all teeth. Correlation and linear regression results were significant for GMBC-V and GMBC-I in incisors, canines, and premolars. CBCT is an effective diagnostic method to visualize and measure GT, GMBC-V, and GMBC-I.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4396723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43967232015-04-27 Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest Borges, Germana Jayme Ruiz, Luis Fernando Naldi de Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves Porto, Olavo César Lyra Estrela, Carlos ScientificWorldJournal Clinical Study The objective of the present study was to assess cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness (GT) and distance between gingival margin and vestibular (GMBC-V) and interproximal bone crests (GMBC-I). GT and GMBC-V were measured in 348 teeth and GMBC-I was measured in 377 tooth regions of 29 patients with gummy smile. GT was assessed using transgingival probing (TP), ultrasound (US), and CBCT, whereas GMBC-V and GMBC-I were assessed by transsurgical clinical evaluation (TCE) and CBCT. Statistical analyses used independent t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and simple linear regression. Difference was observed for GT: between TP, CBCT, and US considering all teeth; between TP and CBCT and between TP and US in incisors and canines; between TP and US in premolars and first molars. TP presented the highest means for GT. Positive correlation and linear regression were observed between TP and CBCT, TP and US, and CBCT and US. Difference was observed for GMBC-V and GMBC-I using TCE and CBCT, considering all teeth. Correlation and linear regression results were significant for GMBC-V and GMBC-I in incisors, canines, and premolars. CBCT is an effective diagnostic method to visualize and measure GT, GMBC-V, and GMBC-I. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4396723/ /pubmed/25918737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/142108 Text en Copyright © 2015 Germana Jayme Borges et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Borges, Germana Jayme
Ruiz, Luis Fernando Naldi
de Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves
Porto, Olavo César Lyra
Estrela, Carlos
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest
title Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest
title_full Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest
title_fullStr Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest
title_full_unstemmed Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest
title_short Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest
title_sort cone-beam computed tomography as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness and distance between gingival margin and bone crest
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25918737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/142108
work_keys_str_mv AT borgesgermanajayme conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest
AT ruizluisfernandonaldi conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest
AT dealencaranahelenagoncalves conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest
AT portoolavocesarlyra conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest
AT estrelacarlos conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest