Cargando…
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest
The objective of the present study was to assess cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness (GT) and distance between gingival margin and vestibular (GMBC-V) and interproximal bone crests (GMBC-I). GT and GMBC-V were measured in 348 teeth and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25918737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/142108 |
_version_ | 1782366621501751296 |
---|---|
author | Borges, Germana Jayme Ruiz, Luis Fernando Naldi de Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves Porto, Olavo César Lyra Estrela, Carlos |
author_facet | Borges, Germana Jayme Ruiz, Luis Fernando Naldi de Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves Porto, Olavo César Lyra Estrela, Carlos |
author_sort | Borges, Germana Jayme |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of the present study was to assess cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness (GT) and distance between gingival margin and vestibular (GMBC-V) and interproximal bone crests (GMBC-I). GT and GMBC-V were measured in 348 teeth and GMBC-I was measured in 377 tooth regions of 29 patients with gummy smile. GT was assessed using transgingival probing (TP), ultrasound (US), and CBCT, whereas GMBC-V and GMBC-I were assessed by transsurgical clinical evaluation (TCE) and CBCT. Statistical analyses used independent t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and simple linear regression. Difference was observed for GT: between TP, CBCT, and US considering all teeth; between TP and CBCT and between TP and US in incisors and canines; between TP and US in premolars and first molars. TP presented the highest means for GT. Positive correlation and linear regression were observed between TP and CBCT, TP and US, and CBCT and US. Difference was observed for GMBC-V and GMBC-I using TCE and CBCT, considering all teeth. Correlation and linear regression results were significant for GMBC-V and GMBC-I in incisors, canines, and premolars. CBCT is an effective diagnostic method to visualize and measure GT, GMBC-V, and GMBC-I. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4396723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43967232015-04-27 Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest Borges, Germana Jayme Ruiz, Luis Fernando Naldi de Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves Porto, Olavo César Lyra Estrela, Carlos ScientificWorldJournal Clinical Study The objective of the present study was to assess cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness (GT) and distance between gingival margin and vestibular (GMBC-V) and interproximal bone crests (GMBC-I). GT and GMBC-V were measured in 348 teeth and GMBC-I was measured in 377 tooth regions of 29 patients with gummy smile. GT was assessed using transgingival probing (TP), ultrasound (US), and CBCT, whereas GMBC-V and GMBC-I were assessed by transsurgical clinical evaluation (TCE) and CBCT. Statistical analyses used independent t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and simple linear regression. Difference was observed for GT: between TP, CBCT, and US considering all teeth; between TP and CBCT and between TP and US in incisors and canines; between TP and US in premolars and first molars. TP presented the highest means for GT. Positive correlation and linear regression were observed between TP and CBCT, TP and US, and CBCT and US. Difference was observed for GMBC-V and GMBC-I using TCE and CBCT, considering all teeth. Correlation and linear regression results were significant for GMBC-V and GMBC-I in incisors, canines, and premolars. CBCT is an effective diagnostic method to visualize and measure GT, GMBC-V, and GMBC-I. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4396723/ /pubmed/25918737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/142108 Text en Copyright © 2015 Germana Jayme Borges et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Borges, Germana Jayme Ruiz, Luis Fernando Naldi de Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves Porto, Olavo César Lyra Estrela, Carlos Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest |
title | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest |
title_full | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest |
title_fullStr | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest |
title_full_unstemmed | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest |
title_short | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest |
title_sort | cone-beam computed tomography as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness and distance between gingival margin and bone crest |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25918737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/142108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borgesgermanajayme conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest AT ruizluisfernandonaldi conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest AT dealencaranahelenagoncalves conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest AT portoolavocesarlyra conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest AT estrelacarlos conebeamcomputedtomographyasadiagnosticmethodfordeterminationofgingivalthicknessanddistancebetweengingivalmarginandbonecrest |