Cargando…

Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The insertion of central venous access devices, such as totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs), is routine in patients who need a safe and permanent venous access. The number of port implantations is increasing due to the development of innovative adjuvant and neo-adjuvant ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hüttner, Felix J, Bruckner, Tom, Alldinger, Ingo, Hennes, Roland, Ulrich, Alexis, Büchler, Markus W, Diener, Markus K, Knebel, Phillip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0643-z
_version_ 1782366643625656320
author Hüttner, Felix J
Bruckner, Tom
Alldinger, Ingo
Hennes, Roland
Ulrich, Alexis
Büchler, Markus W
Diener, Markus K
Knebel, Phillip
author_facet Hüttner, Felix J
Bruckner, Tom
Alldinger, Ingo
Hennes, Roland
Ulrich, Alexis
Büchler, Markus W
Diener, Markus K
Knebel, Phillip
author_sort Hüttner, Felix J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The insertion of central venous access devices, such as totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs), is routine in patients who need a safe and permanent venous access. The number of port implantations is increasing due to the development of innovative adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapies. Currently, two different strategies are being routinely used: surgical cut-down of the cephalic vein (vena section) and direct puncture of the subclavian vein. The aim of this trial is to identify the strategy for the implantation of TIVAPs with the lowest risk of pneumothorax and haemothorax. METHODS/DESIGN: The PORTAS-3 trial is designed as a multicentre, randomised controlled trial to compare two implantation strategies. A total of 1,154 patients will be randomised after giving written informed consent. Patients must be over 18 years of age and scheduled for primary implantation of a TIVAP on the designated side. The primary endpoint will be the frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after insertion of a TIVAP by one of two different strategies. The experimental intervention is as follows: open strategy, defined as surgical cut-down of the cephalic vein, supported by a rescue technique if necessary, and in the case of failure, direct puncture of the subclavian vein. The control intervention is as follows: direct puncture of the subclavian vein using the Seldinger technique guided by sonography, fluoroscopy or landmark technique. The trial duration is approximately 36 months, with a recruitment period of 18 months and a follow-up period of 30 days. DISCUSSION: The PORTAS-3 trial will compare two different TIVAP implantation strategies with regard to their individual risk of postoperative pneumothorax and haemothorax. Since TIVAP implantation is one of the most common procedures in general surgery, the results will be of interest for a large community of surgeons as well as oncologists and general practitioners. The pragmatic trial design ensures that the results will be generalizable to a wide range of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial protocol was registered on 28 August 2014 with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00004900). The World Health Organization’s Universal Trial Number is U1111-1142-4420. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0643-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4396913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43969132015-04-15 Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Hüttner, Felix J Bruckner, Tom Alldinger, Ingo Hennes, Roland Ulrich, Alexis Büchler, Markus W Diener, Markus K Knebel, Phillip Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The insertion of central venous access devices, such as totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs), is routine in patients who need a safe and permanent venous access. The number of port implantations is increasing due to the development of innovative adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapies. Currently, two different strategies are being routinely used: surgical cut-down of the cephalic vein (vena section) and direct puncture of the subclavian vein. The aim of this trial is to identify the strategy for the implantation of TIVAPs with the lowest risk of pneumothorax and haemothorax. METHODS/DESIGN: The PORTAS-3 trial is designed as a multicentre, randomised controlled trial to compare two implantation strategies. A total of 1,154 patients will be randomised after giving written informed consent. Patients must be over 18 years of age and scheduled for primary implantation of a TIVAP on the designated side. The primary endpoint will be the frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after insertion of a TIVAP by one of two different strategies. The experimental intervention is as follows: open strategy, defined as surgical cut-down of the cephalic vein, supported by a rescue technique if necessary, and in the case of failure, direct puncture of the subclavian vein. The control intervention is as follows: direct puncture of the subclavian vein using the Seldinger technique guided by sonography, fluoroscopy or landmark technique. The trial duration is approximately 36 months, with a recruitment period of 18 months and a follow-up period of 30 days. DISCUSSION: The PORTAS-3 trial will compare two different TIVAP implantation strategies with regard to their individual risk of postoperative pneumothorax and haemothorax. Since TIVAP implantation is one of the most common procedures in general surgery, the results will be of interest for a large community of surgeons as well as oncologists and general practitioners. The pragmatic trial design ensures that the results will be generalizable to a wide range of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial protocol was registered on 28 August 2014 with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00004900). The World Health Organization’s Universal Trial Number is U1111-1142-4420. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0643-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4396913/ /pubmed/25872780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0643-z Text en © Hüttner et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hüttner, Felix J
Bruckner, Tom
Alldinger, Ingo
Hennes, Roland
Ulrich, Alexis
Büchler, Markus W
Diener, Markus K
Knebel, Phillip
Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0643-z
work_keys_str_mv AT huttnerfelixj frequencyofpneumothoraxandhaemothoraxafterprimaryopenversusclosedimplantationstrategiesforinsertionofatotallyimplantablevenousaccessportinoncologicalpatientsstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brucknertom frequencyofpneumothoraxandhaemothoraxafterprimaryopenversusclosedimplantationstrategiesforinsertionofatotallyimplantablevenousaccessportinoncologicalpatientsstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alldingeringo frequencyofpneumothoraxandhaemothoraxafterprimaryopenversusclosedimplantationstrategiesforinsertionofatotallyimplantablevenousaccessportinoncologicalpatientsstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hennesroland frequencyofpneumothoraxandhaemothoraxafterprimaryopenversusclosedimplantationstrategiesforinsertionofatotallyimplantablevenousaccessportinoncologicalpatientsstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ulrichalexis frequencyofpneumothoraxandhaemothoraxafterprimaryopenversusclosedimplantationstrategiesforinsertionofatotallyimplantablevenousaccessportinoncologicalpatientsstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT buchlermarkusw frequencyofpneumothoraxandhaemothoraxafterprimaryopenversusclosedimplantationstrategiesforinsertionofatotallyimplantablevenousaccessportinoncologicalpatientsstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dienermarkusk frequencyofpneumothoraxandhaemothoraxafterprimaryopenversusclosedimplantationstrategiesforinsertionofatotallyimplantablevenousaccessportinoncologicalpatientsstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knebelphillip frequencyofpneumothoraxandhaemothoraxafterprimaryopenversusclosedimplantationstrategiesforinsertionofatotallyimplantablevenousaccessportinoncologicalpatientsstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial