Cargando…

Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Many studies have measured the intensity of end of life care. However, no summary of the measures used in the field is currently available. OBJECTIVES: To summarise features, characteristics of use and reported validity of measures used for evaluating intensity of end of life care. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luta, Xhyljeta, Maessen, Maud, Egger, Matthias, Stuck, Andreas E., Goodman, David, Clough-Gorr, Kerri M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123764
_version_ 1782366649695862784
author Luta, Xhyljeta
Maessen, Maud
Egger, Matthias
Stuck, Andreas E.
Goodman, David
Clough-Gorr, Kerri M.
author_facet Luta, Xhyljeta
Maessen, Maud
Egger, Matthias
Stuck, Andreas E.
Goodman, David
Clough-Gorr, Kerri M.
author_sort Luta, Xhyljeta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many studies have measured the intensity of end of life care. However, no summary of the measures used in the field is currently available. OBJECTIVES: To summarise features, characteristics of use and reported validity of measures used for evaluating intensity of end of life care. METHODS: This was a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. We performed a comprehensive literature search in Ovid Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and reference lists published between 1990-2014. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, full texts and extracted data. Studies were eligible if they used a measure of end of life care intensity, defined as all quantifiable measures describing the type and intensity of medical care administered during the last year of life. RESULTS: A total of 58 of 1590 potentially eligible studies met our inclusion criteria and were included. The most commonly reported measures were hospitalizations (n = 44), intensive care unit admissions (n = 39) and chemotherapy use (n = 27). Studies measured intensity of care in different timeframes ranging from 48 hours to 12 months. The majority of studies were conducted in cancer patients (n = 31). Only 4 studies included information on validation of the measures used. None evaluated construct validity, while 3 studies considered criterion and 1 study reported both content and criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a synthesis to aid in choosing intensity of end of life care measures based on their previous use but simultaneously highlights the crucial need for more validation studies and consensus in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4396980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43969802015-04-21 Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review Luta, Xhyljeta Maessen, Maud Egger, Matthias Stuck, Andreas E. Goodman, David Clough-Gorr, Kerri M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Many studies have measured the intensity of end of life care. However, no summary of the measures used in the field is currently available. OBJECTIVES: To summarise features, characteristics of use and reported validity of measures used for evaluating intensity of end of life care. METHODS: This was a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. We performed a comprehensive literature search in Ovid Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and reference lists published between 1990-2014. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, full texts and extracted data. Studies were eligible if they used a measure of end of life care intensity, defined as all quantifiable measures describing the type and intensity of medical care administered during the last year of life. RESULTS: A total of 58 of 1590 potentially eligible studies met our inclusion criteria and were included. The most commonly reported measures were hospitalizations (n = 44), intensive care unit admissions (n = 39) and chemotherapy use (n = 27). Studies measured intensity of care in different timeframes ranging from 48 hours to 12 months. The majority of studies were conducted in cancer patients (n = 31). Only 4 studies included information on validation of the measures used. None evaluated construct validity, while 3 studies considered criterion and 1 study reported both content and criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a synthesis to aid in choosing intensity of end of life care measures based on their previous use but simultaneously highlights the crucial need for more validation studies and consensus in the field. Public Library of Science 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4396980/ /pubmed/25875471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123764 Text en © 2015 Luta et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luta, Xhyljeta
Maessen, Maud
Egger, Matthias
Stuck, Andreas E.
Goodman, David
Clough-Gorr, Kerri M.
Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review
title Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review
title_full Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review
title_short Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review
title_sort measuring intensity of end of life care: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123764
work_keys_str_mv AT lutaxhyljeta measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview
AT maessenmaud measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview
AT eggermatthias measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview
AT stuckandrease measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview
AT goodmandavid measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview
AT cloughgorrkerrim measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview