Cargando…
Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Many studies have measured the intensity of end of life care. However, no summary of the measures used in the field is currently available. OBJECTIVES: To summarise features, characteristics of use and reported validity of measures used for evaluating intensity of end of life care. METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123764 |
_version_ | 1782366649695862784 |
---|---|
author | Luta, Xhyljeta Maessen, Maud Egger, Matthias Stuck, Andreas E. Goodman, David Clough-Gorr, Kerri M. |
author_facet | Luta, Xhyljeta Maessen, Maud Egger, Matthias Stuck, Andreas E. Goodman, David Clough-Gorr, Kerri M. |
author_sort | Luta, Xhyljeta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many studies have measured the intensity of end of life care. However, no summary of the measures used in the field is currently available. OBJECTIVES: To summarise features, characteristics of use and reported validity of measures used for evaluating intensity of end of life care. METHODS: This was a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. We performed a comprehensive literature search in Ovid Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and reference lists published between 1990-2014. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, full texts and extracted data. Studies were eligible if they used a measure of end of life care intensity, defined as all quantifiable measures describing the type and intensity of medical care administered during the last year of life. RESULTS: A total of 58 of 1590 potentially eligible studies met our inclusion criteria and were included. The most commonly reported measures were hospitalizations (n = 44), intensive care unit admissions (n = 39) and chemotherapy use (n = 27). Studies measured intensity of care in different timeframes ranging from 48 hours to 12 months. The majority of studies were conducted in cancer patients (n = 31). Only 4 studies included information on validation of the measures used. None evaluated construct validity, while 3 studies considered criterion and 1 study reported both content and criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a synthesis to aid in choosing intensity of end of life care measures based on their previous use but simultaneously highlights the crucial need for more validation studies and consensus in the field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4396980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43969802015-04-21 Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review Luta, Xhyljeta Maessen, Maud Egger, Matthias Stuck, Andreas E. Goodman, David Clough-Gorr, Kerri M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Many studies have measured the intensity of end of life care. However, no summary of the measures used in the field is currently available. OBJECTIVES: To summarise features, characteristics of use and reported validity of measures used for evaluating intensity of end of life care. METHODS: This was a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. We performed a comprehensive literature search in Ovid Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and reference lists published between 1990-2014. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, full texts and extracted data. Studies were eligible if they used a measure of end of life care intensity, defined as all quantifiable measures describing the type and intensity of medical care administered during the last year of life. RESULTS: A total of 58 of 1590 potentially eligible studies met our inclusion criteria and were included. The most commonly reported measures were hospitalizations (n = 44), intensive care unit admissions (n = 39) and chemotherapy use (n = 27). Studies measured intensity of care in different timeframes ranging from 48 hours to 12 months. The majority of studies were conducted in cancer patients (n = 31). Only 4 studies included information on validation of the measures used. None evaluated construct validity, while 3 studies considered criterion and 1 study reported both content and criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a synthesis to aid in choosing intensity of end of life care measures based on their previous use but simultaneously highlights the crucial need for more validation studies and consensus in the field. Public Library of Science 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4396980/ /pubmed/25875471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123764 Text en © 2015 Luta et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Luta, Xhyljeta Maessen, Maud Egger, Matthias Stuck, Andreas E. Goodman, David Clough-Gorr, Kerri M. Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review |
title | Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Measuring Intensity of End of Life Care: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | measuring intensity of end of life care: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lutaxhyljeta measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview AT maessenmaud measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview AT eggermatthias measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview AT stuckandrease measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview AT goodmandavid measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview AT cloughgorrkerrim measuringintensityofendoflifecareasystematicreview |